Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

Mathilde Johansen, Simon Francis Thomsen

As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer1346026
TidsskriftISRN Biodiversity
Vol/bind2016
Antal sider7
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 167591083