Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
- Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
Forlagets udgivne version, 1,2 MB, PDF-dokument
Mathilde Johansen, Simon Francis Thomsen
As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.
|Status||Udgivet - 2016|
Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk