Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research : A Critical Appraisal. / Johansen, Mathilde; Thomsen, Simon Francis.
I: ISRN Biodiversity, Bind 2016, 1346026, 2016.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research
T2 - A Critical Appraisal
AU - Johansen, Mathilde
AU - Thomsen, Simon Francis
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.
AB - As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.
U2 - 10.1155/2016/1346026
DO - 10.1155/2016/1346026
M3 - Review
C2 - 27382637
VL - 2016
JO - ISRN Biodiversity
JF - ISRN Biodiversity
SN - 2356-7872
M1 - 1346026
ER -
ID: 167591083