Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling. / Apró, William; Moberg, Marcus; Hamilton, D. Lee; Ekblom, Björn; van Hall, Gerrit; Holmberg, Hans-Christer; Blomstrand, Eva.

I: American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, Bind 308, Nr. 6, 15.03.2015, s. E470-E481.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Apró, W, Moberg, M, Hamilton, DL, Ekblom, B, van Hall, G, Holmberg, H-C & Blomstrand, E 2015, 'Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling', American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, bind 308, nr. 6, s. E470-E481. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014

APA

Apró, W., Moberg, M., Hamilton, D. L., Ekblom, B., van Hall, G., Holmberg, H-C., & Blomstrand, E. (2015). Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling. American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 308(6), E470-E481. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014

Vancouver

Apró W, Moberg M, Hamilton DL, Ekblom B, van Hall G, Holmberg H-C o.a. Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling. American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2015 mar. 15;308(6):E470-E481. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014

Author

Apró, William ; Moberg, Marcus ; Hamilton, D. Lee ; Ekblom, Björn ; van Hall, Gerrit ; Holmberg, Hans-Christer ; Blomstrand, Eva. / Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling. I: American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2015 ; Bind 308, Nr. 6. s. E470-E481.

Bibtex

@article{58dbdb66e1b443008831a85abd1297f5,
title = "Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling",
abstract = "Combining endurance and strength training in the same session has been reported to reduce the anabolic response to the latter form of exercise. The underlying mechanism, based primarily on results from rodent muscle, is proposed to involve AMPK-dependent inhibition of mTORC1 signaling. This hypothesis was tested in eight trained male subjects who in randomized order performed either resistance exercise only (R) or interval cycling followed by resistance exercise (ER). Biopsies taken from the vastus lateralis before and after endurance exercise and repeatedly after resistance exercise were assessed for glycogen content, kinase activity, protein phosphorylation, and gene expression. Mixed muscle fractional synthetic rate was measured at rest and during 3 h of recovery using the stable isotope technique. In ER, AMPK activity was elevated immediately after both endurance and resistance exercise (∼90%, P < 0.05) but was unchanged in R. Thr389 phosphorylation of S6K1 was increased severalfold immediately after exercise (P < 0.05) in both trials and increased further throughout recovery. After 90 and 180 min recovery, S6K1 activity was elevated (∼55 and ∼110%, respectively, P < 0.05) and eukaryotic elongation factor 2 phosphorylation was reduced (∼55%, P < 0.05) with no difference between trials. In contrast, markers for protein catabolism were differently influenced by the two modes of exercise; ER induced a significant increase in gene and protein expression of MuRF1 (P < 0.05), which was not observed following R exercise only. In conclusion, cycling-induced elevation in AMPK activity does not inhibit mTOR complex 1 signaling after subsequent resistance exercise but may instead interfere with the hypertrophic response by influencing key components in protein breakdown.",
author = "William Apr{\'o} and Marcus Moberg and Hamilton, {D. Lee} and Bj{\"o}rn Ekblom and {van Hall}, Gerrit and Hans-Christer Holmberg and Eva Blomstrand",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 the American Physiological Society.",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014",
language = "English",
volume = "308",
pages = "E470--E481",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism",
issn = "0193-1849",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling

AU - Apró, William

AU - Moberg, Marcus

AU - Hamilton, D. Lee

AU - Ekblom, Björn

AU - van Hall, Gerrit

AU - Holmberg, Hans-Christer

AU - Blomstrand, Eva

N1 - Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

PY - 2015/3/15

Y1 - 2015/3/15

N2 - Combining endurance and strength training in the same session has been reported to reduce the anabolic response to the latter form of exercise. The underlying mechanism, based primarily on results from rodent muscle, is proposed to involve AMPK-dependent inhibition of mTORC1 signaling. This hypothesis was tested in eight trained male subjects who in randomized order performed either resistance exercise only (R) or interval cycling followed by resistance exercise (ER). Biopsies taken from the vastus lateralis before and after endurance exercise and repeatedly after resistance exercise were assessed for glycogen content, kinase activity, protein phosphorylation, and gene expression. Mixed muscle fractional synthetic rate was measured at rest and during 3 h of recovery using the stable isotope technique. In ER, AMPK activity was elevated immediately after both endurance and resistance exercise (∼90%, P < 0.05) but was unchanged in R. Thr389 phosphorylation of S6K1 was increased severalfold immediately after exercise (P < 0.05) in both trials and increased further throughout recovery. After 90 and 180 min recovery, S6K1 activity was elevated (∼55 and ∼110%, respectively, P < 0.05) and eukaryotic elongation factor 2 phosphorylation was reduced (∼55%, P < 0.05) with no difference between trials. In contrast, markers for protein catabolism were differently influenced by the two modes of exercise; ER induced a significant increase in gene and protein expression of MuRF1 (P < 0.05), which was not observed following R exercise only. In conclusion, cycling-induced elevation in AMPK activity does not inhibit mTOR complex 1 signaling after subsequent resistance exercise but may instead interfere with the hypertrophic response by influencing key components in protein breakdown.

AB - Combining endurance and strength training in the same session has been reported to reduce the anabolic response to the latter form of exercise. The underlying mechanism, based primarily on results from rodent muscle, is proposed to involve AMPK-dependent inhibition of mTORC1 signaling. This hypothesis was tested in eight trained male subjects who in randomized order performed either resistance exercise only (R) or interval cycling followed by resistance exercise (ER). Biopsies taken from the vastus lateralis before and after endurance exercise and repeatedly after resistance exercise were assessed for glycogen content, kinase activity, protein phosphorylation, and gene expression. Mixed muscle fractional synthetic rate was measured at rest and during 3 h of recovery using the stable isotope technique. In ER, AMPK activity was elevated immediately after both endurance and resistance exercise (∼90%, P < 0.05) but was unchanged in R. Thr389 phosphorylation of S6K1 was increased severalfold immediately after exercise (P < 0.05) in both trials and increased further throughout recovery. After 90 and 180 min recovery, S6K1 activity was elevated (∼55 and ∼110%, respectively, P < 0.05) and eukaryotic elongation factor 2 phosphorylation was reduced (∼55%, P < 0.05) with no difference between trials. In contrast, markers for protein catabolism were differently influenced by the two modes of exercise; ER induced a significant increase in gene and protein expression of MuRF1 (P < 0.05), which was not observed following R exercise only. In conclusion, cycling-induced elevation in AMPK activity does not inhibit mTOR complex 1 signaling after subsequent resistance exercise but may instead interfere with the hypertrophic response by influencing key components in protein breakdown.

U2 - 10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014

DO - 10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25605643

VL - 308

SP - E470-E481

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

SN - 0193-1849

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 135220318