Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness. / Hansen, Mikkel T.; Rømer, Tue; Højgaard, Amalie; Husted, Karina; Sørensen, Kasper; Schmidt, Samuel E.; Dela, Flemming; Helge, Jørn W.

I: Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, Bind 4, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 155-163.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansen, MT, Rømer, T, Højgaard, A, Husted, K, Sørensen, K, Schmidt, SE, Dela, F & Helge, JW 2023, 'Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness', Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, bind 4, nr. 5, s. 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020

APA

Hansen, M. T., Rømer, T., Højgaard, A., Husted, K., Sørensen, K., Schmidt, S. E., Dela, F., & Helge, J. W. (2023). Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, 4(5), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020

Vancouver

Hansen MT, Rømer T, Højgaard A, Husted K, Sørensen K, Schmidt SE o.a. Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal. 2023;4(5):155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020

Author

Hansen, Mikkel T. ; Rømer, Tue ; Højgaard, Amalie ; Husted, Karina ; Sørensen, Kasper ; Schmidt, Samuel E. ; Dela, Flemming ; Helge, Jørn W. / Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness. I: Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal. 2023 ; Bind 4, Nr. 5. s. 155-163.

Bibtex

@article{9c54a70ad2ad4290b37df09b97febf93,
title = "Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness",
abstract = "Background: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, peak oxygen consumption [V.O2peak]) is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and is recognized as an important clinical tool in the assessment of patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the gold standard procedure for determination of V.O2peak but has methodological challenges as it is time-consuming and requires specialized equipment and trained professionals. Seismofit is a chest-mounted medical device for estimating V.O2peak at rest using seismocardiography. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of Seismofit V.O2peak estimation in a healthy population. Methods: On 3 separate days, 20 participants (10 women) underwent estimations of V.O2peak with Seismofit (×2) and Polar Fitness Test (PFT) in randomized order and performed a graded CPET on a cycle ergometer with continuous pulmonary gas exchange measurements. Results: Seismofit V.O2peak showed a significant bias of –3.1 ± 2.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 (mean ± 95% confidence interval) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ±10.8 mL·min–1·kg–1 compared to CPET. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 12.0%. Seismofit V.O2peak had a coefficient of variation of 4.5% ± 1.3% and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 between test days and a bias of 0.0 ± 0.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 with 95% LoA of ±1.6 mL·min–1·kg–1 in test–retest. In addition, Seismofit showed a 2.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 smaller difference in 95% LoA than PFT compared to CPET. Conclusion: The Seismofit is highly reliable in its estimation of V.O2peak. However, based on the measurement error and MAPE >10%, the Seismofit V.O2peak estimation model needs further improvement to be considered for use in clinical settings.",
keywords = "Cardiorespiratory fitness test, Method agreement, Nonexercise VOpeak equation, Seismocardiography, VOmax estimation",
author = "Hansen, {Mikkel T.} and Tue R{\o}mer and Amalie H{\o}jgaard and Karina Husted and Kasper S{\o}rensen and Schmidt, {Samuel E.} and Flemming Dela and Helge, {J{\o}rn W.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Heart Rhythm Society",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "155--163",
journal = "Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal",
issn = "2666-6936",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness

AU - Hansen, Mikkel T.

AU - Rømer, Tue

AU - Højgaard, Amalie

AU - Husted, Karina

AU - Sørensen, Kasper

AU - Schmidt, Samuel E.

AU - Dela, Flemming

AU - Helge, Jørn W.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, peak oxygen consumption [V.O2peak]) is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and is recognized as an important clinical tool in the assessment of patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the gold standard procedure for determination of V.O2peak but has methodological challenges as it is time-consuming and requires specialized equipment and trained professionals. Seismofit is a chest-mounted medical device for estimating V.O2peak at rest using seismocardiography. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of Seismofit V.O2peak estimation in a healthy population. Methods: On 3 separate days, 20 participants (10 women) underwent estimations of V.O2peak with Seismofit (×2) and Polar Fitness Test (PFT) in randomized order and performed a graded CPET on a cycle ergometer with continuous pulmonary gas exchange measurements. Results: Seismofit V.O2peak showed a significant bias of –3.1 ± 2.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 (mean ± 95% confidence interval) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ±10.8 mL·min–1·kg–1 compared to CPET. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 12.0%. Seismofit V.O2peak had a coefficient of variation of 4.5% ± 1.3% and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 between test days and a bias of 0.0 ± 0.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 with 95% LoA of ±1.6 mL·min–1·kg–1 in test–retest. In addition, Seismofit showed a 2.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 smaller difference in 95% LoA than PFT compared to CPET. Conclusion: The Seismofit is highly reliable in its estimation of V.O2peak. However, based on the measurement error and MAPE >10%, the Seismofit V.O2peak estimation model needs further improvement to be considered for use in clinical settings.

AB - Background: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, peak oxygen consumption [V.O2peak]) is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and is recognized as an important clinical tool in the assessment of patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the gold standard procedure for determination of V.O2peak but has methodological challenges as it is time-consuming and requires specialized equipment and trained professionals. Seismofit is a chest-mounted medical device for estimating V.O2peak at rest using seismocardiography. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of Seismofit V.O2peak estimation in a healthy population. Methods: On 3 separate days, 20 participants (10 women) underwent estimations of V.O2peak with Seismofit (×2) and Polar Fitness Test (PFT) in randomized order and performed a graded CPET on a cycle ergometer with continuous pulmonary gas exchange measurements. Results: Seismofit V.O2peak showed a significant bias of –3.1 ± 2.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 (mean ± 95% confidence interval) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ±10.8 mL·min–1·kg–1 compared to CPET. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 12.0%. Seismofit V.O2peak had a coefficient of variation of 4.5% ± 1.3% and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 between test days and a bias of 0.0 ± 0.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 with 95% LoA of ±1.6 mL·min–1·kg–1 in test–retest. In addition, Seismofit showed a 2.4 mL·min–1·kg–1 smaller difference in 95% LoA than PFT compared to CPET. Conclusion: The Seismofit is highly reliable in its estimation of V.O2peak. However, based on the measurement error and MAPE >10%, the Seismofit V.O2peak estimation model needs further improvement to be considered for use in clinical settings.

KW - Cardiorespiratory fitness test

KW - Method agreement

KW - Nonexercise VOpeak equation

KW - Seismocardiography

KW - VOmax estimation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173021779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020

DO - 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.020

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37850043

AN - SCOPUS:85173021779

VL - 4

SP - 155

EP - 163

JO - Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal

JF - Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal

SN - 2666-6936

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 369867943