Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed?

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed? / Kind, Hans Jarle; Köthenbürger, Marko; Schjelderup, Guttorm.

Munich, 2009.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Kind, HJ, Köthenbürger, M & Schjelderup, G 2009 'Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed?' Munich. <http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/page/portal/ifoHome/b-publ/b3publwp/_wp_by_number?p_number=2589>

APA

Kind, H. J., Köthenbürger, M., & Schjelderup, G. (2009). Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed?. http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/page/portal/ifoHome/b-publ/b3publwp/_wp_by_number?p_number=2589

Vancouver

Kind HJ, Köthenbürger M, Schjelderup G. Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed? Munich. 2009.

Author

Kind, Hans Jarle ; Köthenbürger, Marko ; Schjelderup, Guttorm. / Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed?. Munich, 2009.

Bibtex

@techreport{0a608f309b9b11debc73000ea68e967b,
title = "Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed?",
abstract = "Empirical evidence suggests that people dislike ads in media products like TV programs. In such situations standard economic theory prescribes that the advertising volume can be optimally reduced by levying a tax on ads. However, making use of recent advances in the theory of Industrial Organization and two-sided markets we show that taxing ads may be counterproductive. In particular, we identify a number of situations in which ad-adverse consumers are negatively affected by the tax, and we even show that the tax may lead to higher ad volumes. This unorthodox reaction to a tax may arise when consumers significantly dislike ads, i.e. in situations where traditional arguments for corrective taxes are strongest.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, two-sided markets, media market, pricing strategy, ad-tax",
author = "Kind, {Hans Jarle} and Marko K{\"o}thenb{\"u}rger and Guttorm Schjelderup",
note = "JEL classification: D40, D43, H21, H22, L13",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed?

AU - Kind, Hans Jarle

AU - Köthenbürger, Marko

AU - Schjelderup, Guttorm

N1 - JEL classification: D40, D43, H21, H22, L13

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Empirical evidence suggests that people dislike ads in media products like TV programs. In such situations standard economic theory prescribes that the advertising volume can be optimally reduced by levying a tax on ads. However, making use of recent advances in the theory of Industrial Organization and two-sided markets we show that taxing ads may be counterproductive. In particular, we identify a number of situations in which ad-adverse consumers are negatively affected by the tax, and we even show that the tax may lead to higher ad volumes. This unorthodox reaction to a tax may arise when consumers significantly dislike ads, i.e. in situations where traditional arguments for corrective taxes are strongest.

AB - Empirical evidence suggests that people dislike ads in media products like TV programs. In such situations standard economic theory prescribes that the advertising volume can be optimally reduced by levying a tax on ads. However, making use of recent advances in the theory of Industrial Organization and two-sided markets we show that taxing ads may be counterproductive. In particular, we identify a number of situations in which ad-adverse consumers are negatively affected by the tax, and we even show that the tax may lead to higher ad volumes. This unorthodox reaction to a tax may arise when consumers significantly dislike ads, i.e. in situations where traditional arguments for corrective taxes are strongest.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - two-sided markets

KW - media market

KW - pricing strategy

KW - ad-tax

M3 - Working paper

BT - Should Utility-Reducing Media Advertising be Taxed?

CY - Munich

ER -

ID: 14249847