Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy: Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy : Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines. / Stéen, E Johanna L; Edem, Patricia E; Nørregaard, Kamilla; Jørgensen, Jesper T; Shalgunov, Vladimir; Kjaer, Andreas; Herth, Matthias M.

I: Biomaterials, Bind 179, 10.2018, s. 209-245.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Stéen, EJL, Edem, PE, Nørregaard, K, Jørgensen, JT, Shalgunov, V, Kjaer, A & Herth, MM 2018, 'Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy: Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines', Biomaterials, bind 179, s. 209-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.021

APA

Stéen, E. J. L., Edem, P. E., Nørregaard, K., Jørgensen, J. T., Shalgunov, V., Kjaer, A., & Herth, M. M. (2018). Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy: Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines. Biomaterials, 179, 209-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.021

Vancouver

Stéen EJL, Edem PE, Nørregaard K, Jørgensen JT, Shalgunov V, Kjaer A o.a. Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy: Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines. Biomaterials. 2018 okt;179:209-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.021

Author

Stéen, E Johanna L ; Edem, Patricia E ; Nørregaard, Kamilla ; Jørgensen, Jesper T ; Shalgunov, Vladimir ; Kjaer, Andreas ; Herth, Matthias M. / Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy : Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines. I: Biomaterials. 2018 ; Bind 179. s. 209-245.

Bibtex

@article{d6c0bbaa2c0a41fcaa00df4663ccd519,
title = "Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy: Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines",
abstract = "Pretargeted nuclear imaging and radiotherapy have recently attracted increasing attention for diagnosis and treatment of cancer with nanomedicines. This is because it conceptually offers better imaging contrast and therapeutic efficiency while reducing the dose to radiosensitive tissues compared to conventional strategies. In conventional imaging and radiotherapy, a directly radiolabeled nano-sized vector is administered and allowed to accumulate in the tumor, typically on a timescale of several days. In contrast, pretargeting is based on a two-step approach. First, a tumor-accumulating vector carrying a tag is administered followed by injection of a fast clearing radiolabeled agent that rapidly recognizes the tag of the tumor-bound vector in vivo. Therefore, pretargeting circumvents the use of long-lived radionuclides that is a necessity for sufficient tumor accumulation and target-to-background ratios using conventional approaches. In this review, we give an overview of recent advances in pretargeted imaging strategies. We will critically reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of current state-of-the-art conventional imaging approaches and compare them to pretargeted strategies. We will discuss the pretargeted imaging concept and the involved chemistry. Finally, we will discuss the steps forward in respect to clinical translation, and how pretargeted strategies could be applied to improve state-of-the-art radiotherapeutic approaches.",
author = "St{\'e}en, {E Johanna L} and Edem, {Patricia E} and Kamilla N{\o}rregaard and J{\o}rgensen, {Jesper T} and Vladimir Shalgunov and Andreas Kjaer and Herth, {Matthias M}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.021",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
pages = "209--245",
journal = "Biomaterials",
issn = "0142-9612",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pretargeting in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy

T2 - Improving efficacy of theranostics and nanomedicines

AU - Stéen, E Johanna L

AU - Edem, Patricia E

AU - Nørregaard, Kamilla

AU - Jørgensen, Jesper T

AU - Shalgunov, Vladimir

AU - Kjaer, Andreas

AU - Herth, Matthias M

N1 - Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Pretargeted nuclear imaging and radiotherapy have recently attracted increasing attention for diagnosis and treatment of cancer with nanomedicines. This is because it conceptually offers better imaging contrast and therapeutic efficiency while reducing the dose to radiosensitive tissues compared to conventional strategies. In conventional imaging and radiotherapy, a directly radiolabeled nano-sized vector is administered and allowed to accumulate in the tumor, typically on a timescale of several days. In contrast, pretargeting is based on a two-step approach. First, a tumor-accumulating vector carrying a tag is administered followed by injection of a fast clearing radiolabeled agent that rapidly recognizes the tag of the tumor-bound vector in vivo. Therefore, pretargeting circumvents the use of long-lived radionuclides that is a necessity for sufficient tumor accumulation and target-to-background ratios using conventional approaches. In this review, we give an overview of recent advances in pretargeted imaging strategies. We will critically reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of current state-of-the-art conventional imaging approaches and compare them to pretargeted strategies. We will discuss the pretargeted imaging concept and the involved chemistry. Finally, we will discuss the steps forward in respect to clinical translation, and how pretargeted strategies could be applied to improve state-of-the-art radiotherapeutic approaches.

AB - Pretargeted nuclear imaging and radiotherapy have recently attracted increasing attention for diagnosis and treatment of cancer with nanomedicines. This is because it conceptually offers better imaging contrast and therapeutic efficiency while reducing the dose to radiosensitive tissues compared to conventional strategies. In conventional imaging and radiotherapy, a directly radiolabeled nano-sized vector is administered and allowed to accumulate in the tumor, typically on a timescale of several days. In contrast, pretargeting is based on a two-step approach. First, a tumor-accumulating vector carrying a tag is administered followed by injection of a fast clearing radiolabeled agent that rapidly recognizes the tag of the tumor-bound vector in vivo. Therefore, pretargeting circumvents the use of long-lived radionuclides that is a necessity for sufficient tumor accumulation and target-to-background ratios using conventional approaches. In this review, we give an overview of recent advances in pretargeted imaging strategies. We will critically reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of current state-of-the-art conventional imaging approaches and compare them to pretargeted strategies. We will discuss the pretargeted imaging concept and the involved chemistry. Finally, we will discuss the steps forward in respect to clinical translation, and how pretargeted strategies could be applied to improve state-of-the-art radiotherapeutic approaches.

U2 - 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.021

DO - 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.021

M3 - Journal article

VL - 179

SP - 209

EP - 245

JO - Biomaterials

JF - Biomaterials

SN - 0142-9612

ER -

ID: 200730768