Physical activity energy expenditure vs cardiorespiratory fitness level in impaired glucose metabolism
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Physical activity energy expenditure vs cardiorespiratory fitness level in impaired glucose metabolism. / Lidegaard, Lærke P; Hansen, Anne-Louise S; Johansen, Nanna B; Witte, Daniel R; Brage, Søren; Lauritzen, Torsten; Jørgensen, Marit E; Christensen, Dirk L; Færch, Kristine.
I: Diabetologia, Bind 58, Nr. 12, 12.2015, s. 2709-17.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical activity energy expenditure vs cardiorespiratory fitness level in impaired glucose metabolism
AU - Lidegaard, Lærke P
AU - Hansen, Anne-Louise S
AU - Johansen, Nanna B
AU - Witte, Daniel R
AU - Brage, Søren
AU - Lauritzen, Torsten
AU - Jørgensen, Marit E
AU - Christensen, Dirk L
AU - Færch, Kristine
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - AIM/HYPOTHESIS: Little is known about the relative roles of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) as determinants of glucose regulation. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of PAEE and CRF with markers of glucose metabolism, and to test the hypothesis that CRF modifies the association between PAEE and glucose metabolism.METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional data from 755 adults from the Danish ADDITION-PRO study. On the basis of OGTT results, participants without known diabetes were classified as having normal glucose tolerance, isolated impaired fasting glycaemia (i-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (i-IGT), combined IFG + IGT or screen-detected diabetes mellitus. Markers of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function were determined. PAEE was measured using a combined heart rate and movement sensor. CRF (maximal oxygen uptake) was estimated using a submaximal 8 min step test. The associations were examined by linear regression analysis. Results were adjusted for relevant confounders.RESULTS: PAEE and CRF were reduced in individuals with i-IGT, combined IFG + IGT and screen-detected diabetes mellitus, but were not significantly different in individuals with i-IFG compared with those with normal glucose tolerance. When adjusting CRF for PAEE and vice versa, PAEE and CRF were both associated with lower fasting and 2 h insulin and higher peripheral insulin sensitivity. CRF was additionally associated with lower fasting and 2 h glucose and higher insulin sensitivity and beta cell function. There was no interaction between CRF and PAEE for any markers of glucose metabolism.CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Only CRF, not PAEE, appears to be independently associated with plasma glucose levels and beta cell function, suggesting that CRF may be particularly important for glycaemic control.
AB - AIM/HYPOTHESIS: Little is known about the relative roles of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) as determinants of glucose regulation. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of PAEE and CRF with markers of glucose metabolism, and to test the hypothesis that CRF modifies the association between PAEE and glucose metabolism.METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional data from 755 adults from the Danish ADDITION-PRO study. On the basis of OGTT results, participants without known diabetes were classified as having normal glucose tolerance, isolated impaired fasting glycaemia (i-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (i-IGT), combined IFG + IGT or screen-detected diabetes mellitus. Markers of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function were determined. PAEE was measured using a combined heart rate and movement sensor. CRF (maximal oxygen uptake) was estimated using a submaximal 8 min step test. The associations were examined by linear regression analysis. Results were adjusted for relevant confounders.RESULTS: PAEE and CRF were reduced in individuals with i-IGT, combined IFG + IGT and screen-detected diabetes mellitus, but were not significantly different in individuals with i-IFG compared with those with normal glucose tolerance. When adjusting CRF for PAEE and vice versa, PAEE and CRF were both associated with lower fasting and 2 h insulin and higher peripheral insulin sensitivity. CRF was additionally associated with lower fasting and 2 h glucose and higher insulin sensitivity and beta cell function. There was no interaction between CRF and PAEE for any markers of glucose metabolism.CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Only CRF, not PAEE, appears to be independently associated with plasma glucose levels and beta cell function, suggesting that CRF may be particularly important for glycaemic control.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Anaerobic Threshold
KW - Blood Glucose
KW - Body Composition
KW - Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
KW - Energy Metabolism
KW - Female
KW - Glucose
KW - Glucose Intolerance
KW - Glucose Tolerance Test
KW - Humans
KW - Insulin Resistance
KW - Longitudinal Studies
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Physical Fitness
KW - Journal Article
KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
U2 - 10.1007/s00125-015-3738-x
DO - 10.1007/s00125-015-3738-x
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26342596
VL - 58
SP - 2709
EP - 2717
JO - Diabetologia
JF - Diabetologia
SN - 0012-186X
IS - 12
ER -
ID: 168777641