Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning : impact of different reconstruction protocols. / Lassen, Martin Lyngby; Wissenberg, Mads; Byrne, Christina; Kjaer, Andreas; Hasbak, Philip.

I: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Bind 29, 2022, s. 3369–3378.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lassen, ML, Wissenberg, M, Byrne, C, Kjaer, A & Hasbak, P 2022, 'Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols', Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, bind 29, s. 3369–3378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1

APA

Lassen, M. L., Wissenberg, M., Byrne, C., Kjaer, A., & Hasbak, P. (2022). Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 29, 3369–3378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1

Vancouver

Lassen ML, Wissenberg M, Byrne C, Kjaer A, Hasbak P. Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2022;29:3369–3378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1

Author

Lassen, Martin Lyngby ; Wissenberg, Mads ; Byrne, Christina ; Kjaer, Andreas ; Hasbak, Philip. / Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning : impact of different reconstruction protocols. I: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2022 ; Bind 29. s. 3369–3378.

Bibtex

@article{46d72c395ee446c38000b883bfc4d05b,
title = "Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols",
abstract = "Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and repeatability of the LVEF measures. Methods: This study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) sessions employing Rubidium-82 PET/CT. A guideline-recommended reconstruction protocol was used for both rest and adenosine stress MPI (150-360 s post-radiotracer injection, standardrecon). For the stress MPI protocol, two additional reconstruction protocols were considered; one was employing 60 seconds data (150-210 seconds, shortfixed) and the other a dynamic frame window based on the bolus arrival of Rubidium-82 in the heart until 210 seconds (x-210 seconds, shortindividual). We report rest and stress LVEF, the LVEF reserve, and the LVEF reserve repeatability. Results: Differences in the LVEF assessments were observed between the guideline recommended and alternative reconstruction protocol (LVEF stress MPI: standardrecon = 68 ± 7%, shortfixed = 71 ± 7% (P =.08), shortindividual = 72 ± 7% (P =.04)), and the LVEF reserve was reduced for the guideline-recommended protocol (standardrecon = 7.8 ± 3.5, shortfixed = 10.1 ± 3.7, shortindividual = 10.5 ± 3.6, all P <.001). The best repeatability measures were obtained for the shortindividual protocol (repeatability: standardrecon = 45.3%, shortfixed = 41.2%, shortindividual = 31.7%). Conclusion: We recommend using the shortindividual reconstruction protocol for improved LVEF repeatability and reserve assessment. Alternatively, in centers with limited technical support we recommend the use of the shortfixed protocol.",
keywords = "adenosine, cardiac imaging, ejection fraction, PET",
author = "Lassen, {Martin Lyngby} and Mads Wissenberg and Christina Byrne and Andreas Kjaer and Philip Hasbak",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "3369–3378",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Cardiology",
issn = "1071-3581",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning

T2 - impact of different reconstruction protocols

AU - Lassen, Martin Lyngby

AU - Wissenberg, Mads

AU - Byrne, Christina

AU - Kjaer, Andreas

AU - Hasbak, Philip

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and repeatability of the LVEF measures. Methods: This study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) sessions employing Rubidium-82 PET/CT. A guideline-recommended reconstruction protocol was used for both rest and adenosine stress MPI (150-360 s post-radiotracer injection, standardrecon). For the stress MPI protocol, two additional reconstruction protocols were considered; one was employing 60 seconds data (150-210 seconds, shortfixed) and the other a dynamic frame window based on the bolus arrival of Rubidium-82 in the heart until 210 seconds (x-210 seconds, shortindividual). We report rest and stress LVEF, the LVEF reserve, and the LVEF reserve repeatability. Results: Differences in the LVEF assessments were observed between the guideline recommended and alternative reconstruction protocol (LVEF stress MPI: standardrecon = 68 ± 7%, shortfixed = 71 ± 7% (P =.08), shortindividual = 72 ± 7% (P =.04)), and the LVEF reserve was reduced for the guideline-recommended protocol (standardrecon = 7.8 ± 3.5, shortfixed = 10.1 ± 3.7, shortindividual = 10.5 ± 3.6, all P <.001). The best repeatability measures were obtained for the shortindividual protocol (repeatability: standardrecon = 45.3%, shortfixed = 41.2%, shortindividual = 31.7%). Conclusion: We recommend using the shortindividual reconstruction protocol for improved LVEF repeatability and reserve assessment. Alternatively, in centers with limited technical support we recommend the use of the shortfixed protocol.

AB - Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and repeatability of the LVEF measures. Methods: This study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) sessions employing Rubidium-82 PET/CT. A guideline-recommended reconstruction protocol was used for both rest and adenosine stress MPI (150-360 s post-radiotracer injection, standardrecon). For the stress MPI protocol, two additional reconstruction protocols were considered; one was employing 60 seconds data (150-210 seconds, shortfixed) and the other a dynamic frame window based on the bolus arrival of Rubidium-82 in the heart until 210 seconds (x-210 seconds, shortindividual). We report rest and stress LVEF, the LVEF reserve, and the LVEF reserve repeatability. Results: Differences in the LVEF assessments were observed between the guideline recommended and alternative reconstruction protocol (LVEF stress MPI: standardrecon = 68 ± 7%, shortfixed = 71 ± 7% (P =.08), shortindividual = 72 ± 7% (P =.04)), and the LVEF reserve was reduced for the guideline-recommended protocol (standardrecon = 7.8 ± 3.5, shortfixed = 10.1 ± 3.7, shortindividual = 10.5 ± 3.6, all P <.001). The best repeatability measures were obtained for the shortindividual protocol (repeatability: standardrecon = 45.3%, shortfixed = 41.2%, shortindividual = 31.7%). Conclusion: We recommend using the shortindividual reconstruction protocol for improved LVEF repeatability and reserve assessment. Alternatively, in centers with limited technical support we recommend the use of the shortfixed protocol.

KW - adenosine

KW - cardiac imaging

KW - ejection fraction

KW - PET

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127937373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1

DO - 10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35415824

AN - SCOPUS:85127937373

VL - 29

SP - 3369

EP - 3378

JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

SN - 1071-3581

ER -

ID: 313867171