Methods to Estimate Energy Expenditure, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Pregnant Women: A Validation Study Using Doubly Labeled Water
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Methods to Estimate Energy Expenditure, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Pregnant Women : A Validation Study Using Doubly Labeled Water. / Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz; Knudsen, Signe de Place; Roland, Caroline Borup; Hergel, Ida Marie; Molsted, Stig; Clausen, Tine D.; Løkkegaard, Ellen; Bendix, Jane M.; Maddison, Ralph; Löf, Marie; Larsen, Jakob Eg; van Hall, Gerrit; Stallknecht, Bente.
I: Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour , Bind 6, Nr. 1, 2023, s. 88-98.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Methods to Estimate Energy Expenditure, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Pregnant Women
T2 - A Validation Study Using Doubly Labeled Water
AU - Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz
AU - Knudsen, Signe de Place
AU - Roland, Caroline Borup
AU - Hergel, Ida Marie
AU - Molsted, Stig
AU - Clausen, Tine D.
AU - Løkkegaard, Ellen
AU - Bendix, Jane M.
AU - Maddison, Ralph
AU - Löf, Marie
AU - Larsen, Jakob Eg
AU - van Hall, Gerrit
AU - Stallknecht, Bente
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Activity trackers and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) measures physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (SED). However, none of these tools have been validated against a criterion method in pregnancy. We aimed to compare a consumer activity tracker and the Danish version of PPAQ (PPAQ-DK) and to validate them using the doubly labeled water technique (DLW) as criterion method. Methods: A total of 220 healthy pregnant women participated. Total energy expenditure (TEE), PA energy expenditure (PAEE), and PA level were determined at gestational Weeks 28–29 using DLW and a Garmin Vivosport (Garmin, Olathe, KS) activity tracker. In addition, PAEE, moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA, and SED were determined using the activity tracker and PPAQ-DK during all three trimesters. Results: TEE from the activity tracker and DLW correlated (r =.63; p <.001), but the activity tracker overestimated TEE (503 kcal/day). Also, the activity tracker overestimated PAEE (303 kcal/day) and PA level compared with DLW. Likewise, PPAQ-DK overestimated PAEE (1,513 kcal/day) compared with DLW. Compared to PPAQ-DK, the activity tracker reported lower values of PAEE and moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA and higher values of SED during all three trimesters. Conclusions: When compared to DLW, we found better agreement of PAEE estimates from the activity tracker than from PPAQ-DK. TEE from the tracker and DLW correlated moderately well, but this was not the case for PAEE or PA level. The activity tracker measured lower PA and higher SED than PPAQ-DK throughout pregnancy. The consumer activity tracker performed better than the questionnaire, but both significantly overestimated PA compared to DLW.
AB - Background: Activity trackers and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) measures physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (SED). However, none of these tools have been validated against a criterion method in pregnancy. We aimed to compare a consumer activity tracker and the Danish version of PPAQ (PPAQ-DK) and to validate them using the doubly labeled water technique (DLW) as criterion method. Methods: A total of 220 healthy pregnant women participated. Total energy expenditure (TEE), PA energy expenditure (PAEE), and PA level were determined at gestational Weeks 28–29 using DLW and a Garmin Vivosport (Garmin, Olathe, KS) activity tracker. In addition, PAEE, moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA, and SED were determined using the activity tracker and PPAQ-DK during all three trimesters. Results: TEE from the activity tracker and DLW correlated (r =.63; p <.001), but the activity tracker overestimated TEE (503 kcal/day). Also, the activity tracker overestimated PAEE (303 kcal/day) and PA level compared with DLW. Likewise, PPAQ-DK overestimated PAEE (1,513 kcal/day) compared with DLW. Compared to PPAQ-DK, the activity tracker reported lower values of PAEE and moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA and higher values of SED during all three trimesters. Conclusions: When compared to DLW, we found better agreement of PAEE estimates from the activity tracker than from PPAQ-DK. TEE from the tracker and DLW correlated moderately well, but this was not the case for PAEE or PA level. The activity tracker measured lower PA and higher SED than PPAQ-DK throughout pregnancy. The consumer activity tracker performed better than the questionnaire, but both significantly overestimated PA compared to DLW.
KW - consumer activity tracker
KW - pregnancy physical activity questionnaire
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150778926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jmpb.2022-0033
DO - 10.1123/jmpb.2022-0033
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85150778926
VL - 6
SP - 88
EP - 98
JO - Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour
JF - Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour
SN - 2575-6605
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 343077182