Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers: The TriQarr in vivo study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers : The TriQarr in vivo study. / Marstrand, Peter; Almatlouh, Kasim; Kanters, Jørgen K.; Graff, Claus; Christensen, Alex Hørby; Bundgaard, Henning; Theilade, Juliane.

I: Heart Rhythm, Bind 18, Nr. 2, 2021, s. 241-249.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Marstrand, P, Almatlouh, K, Kanters, JK, Graff, C, Christensen, AH, Bundgaard, H & Theilade, J 2021, 'Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers: The TriQarr in vivo study', Heart Rhythm, bind 18, nr. 2, s. 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.017

APA

Marstrand, P., Almatlouh, K., Kanters, J. K., Graff, C., Christensen, A. H., Bundgaard, H., & Theilade, J. (2021). Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers: The TriQarr in vivo study. Heart Rhythm, 18(2), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.017

Vancouver

Marstrand P, Almatlouh K, Kanters JK, Graff C, Christensen AH, Bundgaard H o.a. Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers: The TriQarr in vivo study. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(2):241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.017

Author

Marstrand, Peter ; Almatlouh, Kasim ; Kanters, Jørgen K. ; Graff, Claus ; Christensen, Alex Hørby ; Bundgaard, Henning ; Theilade, Juliane. / Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers : The TriQarr in vivo study. I: Heart Rhythm. 2021 ; Bind 18, Nr. 2. s. 241-249.

Bibtex

@article{e8b1d1752d4f4e539be9fff992619f25,
title = "Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers: The TriQarr in vivo study",
abstract = "Background: In patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS), swimming and loud noises have been identified as genotype-specific arrhythmic triggers in LQTS type 1 (LQTS1) and LQTS type 2 (LQTS2), respectively. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare LQTS group responses to arrhythmic triggers. Methods: LQTS1 and LQTS2 patients were included. Before and after beta-blocker intake, electrocardiograms were recorded as participants (1) were exposed to a loud noise of ∼100 dB; and (2) had their face immersed into cold water. Results: Twenty-three patients (9 LQTS1, 14 LQTS2) participated. In response to noise, LQTS groups showed similarly increased heart rate, but LQTS2 patients had corrected QT interval (Fridericia formula) (QTcF) prolonged significantly more than LQTS1 patients (37 ± 8 ms vs 15 ± 6 ms; P = .02). After intake of beta-blocker, QTcF prolongation in LQTS2 patients was significantly blunted and similar to that of LQTS1 patients (P = .90). In response to simulated diving, LQTS groups experienced a heart rate drop of ∼28 bpm, which shortened QTcF similarly in both groups. After intake of beta-blockers, heart rate dropped to 28 ± 2 bpm in LQTS1 patients and 20 ± 3 bpm in LQTS2, resulting in a slower heart rate in LQTS1 compared with LQTS2 (P = .01). In response, QTcF shortened similarly in LQTS1 and LQTS2 patients (57 ± 9 ms vs 36 ± 7 ms; P = .10). Conclusion: When exposed to noise, LQTS2 patients had QTc prolonged significantly more than did LQTS1 patients. Importantly, beta-blockers reduced noise-induced QTc prolongation in LQTS2 patients, thus demonstrating the protective effect of beta-blockers. In response to simulated diving, LQTS groups responded similarly, but a slower heart rate was observed in LQTS1 patients during simulated diving after beta-blocker intake.",
keywords = "Auditory stimuli, Diving reflex, Loud noise, Ventricular arrhythmia",
author = "Peter Marstrand and Kasim Almatlouh and Kanters, {J{\o}rgen K.} and Claus Graff and Christensen, {Alex H{\o}rby} and Henning Bundgaard and Juliane Theilade",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Heart Rhythm Society",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.017",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "241--249",
journal = "Heart Rhythm",
issn = "1547-5271",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long QT syndrome type 1 and 2 patients respond differently to arrhythmic triggers

T2 - The TriQarr in vivo study

AU - Marstrand, Peter

AU - Almatlouh, Kasim

AU - Kanters, Jørgen K.

AU - Graff, Claus

AU - Christensen, Alex Hørby

AU - Bundgaard, Henning

AU - Theilade, Juliane

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: In patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS), swimming and loud noises have been identified as genotype-specific arrhythmic triggers in LQTS type 1 (LQTS1) and LQTS type 2 (LQTS2), respectively. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare LQTS group responses to arrhythmic triggers. Methods: LQTS1 and LQTS2 patients were included. Before and after beta-blocker intake, electrocardiograms were recorded as participants (1) were exposed to a loud noise of ∼100 dB; and (2) had their face immersed into cold water. Results: Twenty-three patients (9 LQTS1, 14 LQTS2) participated. In response to noise, LQTS groups showed similarly increased heart rate, but LQTS2 patients had corrected QT interval (Fridericia formula) (QTcF) prolonged significantly more than LQTS1 patients (37 ± 8 ms vs 15 ± 6 ms; P = .02). After intake of beta-blocker, QTcF prolongation in LQTS2 patients was significantly blunted and similar to that of LQTS1 patients (P = .90). In response to simulated diving, LQTS groups experienced a heart rate drop of ∼28 bpm, which shortened QTcF similarly in both groups. After intake of beta-blockers, heart rate dropped to 28 ± 2 bpm in LQTS1 patients and 20 ± 3 bpm in LQTS2, resulting in a slower heart rate in LQTS1 compared with LQTS2 (P = .01). In response, QTcF shortened similarly in LQTS1 and LQTS2 patients (57 ± 9 ms vs 36 ± 7 ms; P = .10). Conclusion: When exposed to noise, LQTS2 patients had QTc prolonged significantly more than did LQTS1 patients. Importantly, beta-blockers reduced noise-induced QTc prolongation in LQTS2 patients, thus demonstrating the protective effect of beta-blockers. In response to simulated diving, LQTS groups responded similarly, but a slower heart rate was observed in LQTS1 patients during simulated diving after beta-blocker intake.

AB - Background: In patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS), swimming and loud noises have been identified as genotype-specific arrhythmic triggers in LQTS type 1 (LQTS1) and LQTS type 2 (LQTS2), respectively. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare LQTS group responses to arrhythmic triggers. Methods: LQTS1 and LQTS2 patients were included. Before and after beta-blocker intake, electrocardiograms were recorded as participants (1) were exposed to a loud noise of ∼100 dB; and (2) had their face immersed into cold water. Results: Twenty-three patients (9 LQTS1, 14 LQTS2) participated. In response to noise, LQTS groups showed similarly increased heart rate, but LQTS2 patients had corrected QT interval (Fridericia formula) (QTcF) prolonged significantly more than LQTS1 patients (37 ± 8 ms vs 15 ± 6 ms; P = .02). After intake of beta-blocker, QTcF prolongation in LQTS2 patients was significantly blunted and similar to that of LQTS1 patients (P = .90). In response to simulated diving, LQTS groups experienced a heart rate drop of ∼28 bpm, which shortened QTcF similarly in both groups. After intake of beta-blockers, heart rate dropped to 28 ± 2 bpm in LQTS1 patients and 20 ± 3 bpm in LQTS2, resulting in a slower heart rate in LQTS1 compared with LQTS2 (P = .01). In response, QTcF shortened similarly in LQTS1 and LQTS2 patients (57 ± 9 ms vs 36 ± 7 ms; P = .10). Conclusion: When exposed to noise, LQTS2 patients had QTc prolonged significantly more than did LQTS1 patients. Importantly, beta-blockers reduced noise-induced QTc prolongation in LQTS2 patients, thus demonstrating the protective effect of beta-blockers. In response to simulated diving, LQTS groups responded similarly, but a slower heart rate was observed in LQTS1 patients during simulated diving after beta-blocker intake.

KW - Auditory stimuli

KW - Diving reflex

KW - Loud noise

KW - Ventricular arrhythmia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099295911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.017

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32882399

AN - SCOPUS:85099295911

VL - 18

SP - 241

EP - 249

JO - Heart Rhythm

JF - Heart Rhythm

SN - 1547-5271

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 279633434