Effects of Atrial Fibrillation Screening According to N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized LOOP Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 806 KB, PDF-dokument

Background:
Research suggests NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) to be a strong predictor of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. However, its utility in AF screening remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate NT-proBNP as a potential marker for screening efficacy with respect to AF yield and stroke prevention.

Methods:
In the LOOP Study (Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Continuous ECG Monitoring Using Implantable Loop Recorder to Prevent Stroke in High-Risk Individuals), 6004 AF-naïve individuals at least 70 years old and with additional stroke risk factors were randomized 1:3 to either screening with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) and initiation of anticoagulation upon detection of AF episodes lasting ≥6 minutes or usual care (control). This post hoc analysis included study participants with available NT-proBNP measurement at baseline.

Results:
A total of 5819 participants (96.9% of the trial population) were included. The mean age was 74.7 years (SD, 4.1 years) and 47.5% were female. The median NT-proBNP level was 15 pmol/L (interquartile range, 9–28 pmol/L) corresponding to 125 pg/mL (interquartile range, 76–233 pg/mL). NT-proBNP above median was associated with an increased risk of AF diagnosis both in the ILR group (hazard ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.51–2.25]) and the control group (hazard ratio, 2.79 [95% CI, 2.30–3.40]). Participants with NT-proBNP above the median were also at higher risk of clinical events compared with those having lower levels (hazard ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.96–1.54] for stroke or systemic embolism [SE], 1.60 [95% CI, 1.32–1.95] for stroke/SE/cardiovascular death, and 1.91 [95% CI, 1.61–2.26] for all-cause death). Compared with usual care, ILR screening was associated with significant reductions in stroke/SE and stroke/SE/cardiovascular death among participants with NT-proBNP above median (hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.40–0.90] and 0.70 [95% CI, 0.53–0.94], respectively) but not among those with lower levels (Pinteraction=0.029 for stroke/SE and 0.045 for stroke/SE/cardiovascular death). No risk reduction in all-cause death was observed in either NT-proBNP subgroup for ILR versus control (Pinteraction=0.68). Analyzing NT-proBNP as a continuous variable yielded similar findings.

Conclusions:
In an older population with additional stroke risk factors, ILR screening for AF was associated with a significant reduction in stroke risk among individuals with higher NT-proBNP levels but not among those with lower levels. These findings should be considered hypothesis generating and warrant further study before clinical implementation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCirculation
Vol/bind147
Udgave nummer24
Sider (fra-til)1788-1797
Antal sider10
ISSN0009-7322
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
The LOOP study was supported by Innovation Fund Denmark (grant 12-1352259), the Research Foundation for the Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Heart Foundation (grant 11-04-R83-A3363-22625), Aalborg University Talent Management Program, Arvid Nilssons Fond, Skibsreder Per Henriksen, R og Hustrus Fond, the European Union Horizon 2020 program (grant 847770 to the AFFECT-EU Consortium), Læge Sophus Carl Emil Friis og hustru Olga Doris Friis’ Legat, and an unrestricted grant from Medtronic. Dr Xing’s employment is funded by the AFFECT-EU Consortium and thereby the European Union Horizon 2020 program (grant 847770).

Funding Information:
Dr Svendsen reports being a member of Medtronic advisory boards and having received speaker honoraria and research grants from Medtronic in relation to this work and outside this work. Dr Diederichsen reports being a part-time employee of VitalBeats and an advisor at Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, not related to this work. Dr Krieger reports being a Medtronic focus group member. Dr Frikke-Schmidt reports speaker honorarium and consultant fees from Novo Nordisk. Dr Brandes reports research grants from the Region of Zealand, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Danish Heart Foundation, and Theravance, as well as speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol-Myers Squibb, not related to this work. Dr Køber reports speaker honoraria from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Boehringer, not related to this work. The other authors report no conflicts.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

ID: 358109841