Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check. / Leopold, Martin; Dydensborg, Mads; Bonnet, Philippe.

Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 2003. s. 103-113.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Leopold, M, Dydensborg, M & Bonnet, P 2003, Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check. i Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. Association for Computing Machinery, s. 103-113, Sensys 2003, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 29/11/2010. https://doi.org/http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958491.958504

APA

Leopold, M., Dydensborg, M., & Bonnet, P. (2003). Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check. I Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (s. 103-113). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958491.958504

Vancouver

Leopold M, Dydensborg M, Bonnet P. Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check. I Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. Association for Computing Machinery. 2003. s. 103-113 https://doi.org/http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958491.958504

Author

Leopold, Martin ; Dydensborg, Mads ; Bonnet, Philippe. / Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 2003. s. 103-113

Bibtex

@inproceedings{c4261c10f39911dcbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check",
abstract = "The current generation of sensor nodes rely on commodity components. The choice of the radio is particularly important as it impacts not only energy consumption but also software design (e.g., network self-assembly, multihop routing and in-network processing). Bluetooth is one of the most popular commodity radios for wireless devices. As a representative of the frequency hopping spread spectrum radios, it is a natural alternative to broadcast radios in the context of sensor networks. The question is whether Bluetooth can be a viable alternative in practice. In this paper, we report our experience using Bluetooth for the sensor network regime. We describe our tiny Bluetooth stack that allows TinyOS applications to run on Bluetooth-based sensor nodes, we present a multihop network assembly procedure that leverages Bluetooth's device discovery protocol, and we discuss how Bluetooth favorably impacts in-network query processing. Our results show that despite obvious limitations the Bluetooth sensor nodes we studied exhibit interesting properties, such as a good energy per bit sent ratio. This reality check underlies the limitations and some promises of Bluetooth for the sensor network regime.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, sensor networks, bluetooth",
author = "Martin Leopold and Mads Dydensborg and Philippe Bonnet",
year = "2003",
doi = "http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958491.958504",
language = "English",
isbn = "1-58113-707-9",
pages = "103--113",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
note = "null ; Conference date: 29-11-2010",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality check

AU - Leopold, Martin

AU - Dydensborg, Mads

AU - Bonnet, Philippe

N1 - Conference code: 1

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The current generation of sensor nodes rely on commodity components. The choice of the radio is particularly important as it impacts not only energy consumption but also software design (e.g., network self-assembly, multihop routing and in-network processing). Bluetooth is one of the most popular commodity radios for wireless devices. As a representative of the frequency hopping spread spectrum radios, it is a natural alternative to broadcast radios in the context of sensor networks. The question is whether Bluetooth can be a viable alternative in practice. In this paper, we report our experience using Bluetooth for the sensor network regime. We describe our tiny Bluetooth stack that allows TinyOS applications to run on Bluetooth-based sensor nodes, we present a multihop network assembly procedure that leverages Bluetooth's device discovery protocol, and we discuss how Bluetooth favorably impacts in-network query processing. Our results show that despite obvious limitations the Bluetooth sensor nodes we studied exhibit interesting properties, such as a good energy per bit sent ratio. This reality check underlies the limitations and some promises of Bluetooth for the sensor network regime.

AB - The current generation of sensor nodes rely on commodity components. The choice of the radio is particularly important as it impacts not only energy consumption but also software design (e.g., network self-assembly, multihop routing and in-network processing). Bluetooth is one of the most popular commodity radios for wireless devices. As a representative of the frequency hopping spread spectrum radios, it is a natural alternative to broadcast radios in the context of sensor networks. The question is whether Bluetooth can be a viable alternative in practice. In this paper, we report our experience using Bluetooth for the sensor network regime. We describe our tiny Bluetooth stack that allows TinyOS applications to run on Bluetooth-based sensor nodes, we present a multihop network assembly procedure that leverages Bluetooth's device discovery protocol, and we discuss how Bluetooth favorably impacts in-network query processing. Our results show that despite obvious limitations the Bluetooth sensor nodes we studied exhibit interesting properties, such as a good energy per bit sent ratio. This reality check underlies the limitations and some promises of Bluetooth for the sensor network regime.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - sensor networks

KW - bluetooth

U2 - http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958491.958504

DO - http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958491.958504

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 1-58113-707-9

SP - 103

EP - 113

BT - Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

Y2 - 29 November 2010

ER -

ID: 3185428