A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. / Olsen, Flemming Javier; Pedersen, Sune; Skaarup, Kristoffer Grundtvig; Iversen, Allan Zeeberg; Modin, Daniel; Nochioka, Kotaro; Biering-Sørensen, Tor.

I: American Journal of Cardiology, Bind 125, Nr. 10, 2020, s. 1461-1470.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Olsen, FJ, Pedersen, S, Skaarup, KG, Iversen, AZ, Modin, D, Nochioka, K & Biering-Sørensen, T 2020, 'A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction', American Journal of Cardiology, bind 125, nr. 10, s. 1461-1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.024

APA

Olsen, F. J., Pedersen, S., Skaarup, K. G., Iversen, A. Z., Modin, D., Nochioka, K., & Biering-Sørensen, T. (2020). A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 125(10), 1461-1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.024

Vancouver

Olsen FJ, Pedersen S, Skaarup KG, Iversen AZ, Modin D, Nochioka K o.a. A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. American Journal of Cardiology. 2020;125(10):1461-1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.024

Author

Olsen, Flemming Javier ; Pedersen, Sune ; Skaarup, Kristoffer Grundtvig ; Iversen, Allan Zeeberg ; Modin, Daniel ; Nochioka, Kotaro ; Biering-Sørensen, Tor. / A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. I: American Journal of Cardiology. 2020 ; Bind 125, Nr. 10. s. 1461-1470.

Bibtex

@article{88dd2188af2a44128c02a2e4feb1bad1,
title = "A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction",
abstract = "Many echocardiographic measures have been proposed as potential predictors of outcome following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We hypothesized that combining multiple echocardiographic measures in a risk model provides more prognostic information than individual echocardiographic measures. We prospectively included 373 STEMI patients which constituted our derivation cohort. We also identified 298 STEMI patients from a clinical registry that constituted our validation cohort. Echocardiogram was performed at a median of 2 days after infarction. The echocardiogram consisted of conventional and advanced measures. The end point was a composite of heart failure and/or cardiovascular death. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years, we observed 80 events in our derivation cohort. A stepwise backward Cox regression including all echocardiographic parameters identified global longitudinal strain, wall motion score index (WMSI), E/e{\textquoteright}, and E/global strain rate e (E/GLSRe) as significant predictors of outcome. A Classification and Regression Tree analysis outlined a risk model with WMSI, GLSRe, and E/e{\textquoteright} as key echocardiographic parameters. Patients with WMSI ≥ 2.22 were at high risk, patients with WMSI < 2.22, GLSRe < 0.82s−1 and E/e{\textquoteright}≥7.6 at intermediate risk, and patients with WMSI < 2.22 and GLSRe ≥ 0.82s−1 or GLSRe < 0.82s−1 and E/e{\textquoteright} < 7.6 at low risk of heart failure and/or cardiovascular death. When compared with the low-risk group, an incremental risk was observed (intermediate group: HR = 2.52 [1.24;5.11], p = 0.011; high-risk group: HR = 4.37 [1.40;13.66], p = 0.011). The risk model was validated in the validation cohort (C-statistic: 0.71). In conclusion, we devised an echocardiographic risk model for STEMI patients suggesting advanced and conventional measures of systolic function and filling pressures to be important for the prognosis.",
author = "Olsen, {Flemming Javier} and Sune Pedersen and Skaarup, {Kristoffer Grundtvig} and Iversen, {Allan Zeeberg} and Daniel Modin and Kotaro Nochioka and Tor Biering-S{\o}rensen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.024",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "1461--1470",
journal = "Am. J. Cardiol.",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Validated Echocardiographic Risk Model for Predicting Outcome Following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

AU - Olsen, Flemming Javier

AU - Pedersen, Sune

AU - Skaarup, Kristoffer Grundtvig

AU - Iversen, Allan Zeeberg

AU - Modin, Daniel

AU - Nochioka, Kotaro

AU - Biering-Sørensen, Tor

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Many echocardiographic measures have been proposed as potential predictors of outcome following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We hypothesized that combining multiple echocardiographic measures in a risk model provides more prognostic information than individual echocardiographic measures. We prospectively included 373 STEMI patients which constituted our derivation cohort. We also identified 298 STEMI patients from a clinical registry that constituted our validation cohort. Echocardiogram was performed at a median of 2 days after infarction. The echocardiogram consisted of conventional and advanced measures. The end point was a composite of heart failure and/or cardiovascular death. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years, we observed 80 events in our derivation cohort. A stepwise backward Cox regression including all echocardiographic parameters identified global longitudinal strain, wall motion score index (WMSI), E/e’, and E/global strain rate e (E/GLSRe) as significant predictors of outcome. A Classification and Regression Tree analysis outlined a risk model with WMSI, GLSRe, and E/e’ as key echocardiographic parameters. Patients with WMSI ≥ 2.22 were at high risk, patients with WMSI < 2.22, GLSRe < 0.82s−1 and E/e’≥7.6 at intermediate risk, and patients with WMSI < 2.22 and GLSRe ≥ 0.82s−1 or GLSRe < 0.82s−1 and E/e’ < 7.6 at low risk of heart failure and/or cardiovascular death. When compared with the low-risk group, an incremental risk was observed (intermediate group: HR = 2.52 [1.24;5.11], p = 0.011; high-risk group: HR = 4.37 [1.40;13.66], p = 0.011). The risk model was validated in the validation cohort (C-statistic: 0.71). In conclusion, we devised an echocardiographic risk model for STEMI patients suggesting advanced and conventional measures of systolic function and filling pressures to be important for the prognosis.

AB - Many echocardiographic measures have been proposed as potential predictors of outcome following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We hypothesized that combining multiple echocardiographic measures in a risk model provides more prognostic information than individual echocardiographic measures. We prospectively included 373 STEMI patients which constituted our derivation cohort. We also identified 298 STEMI patients from a clinical registry that constituted our validation cohort. Echocardiogram was performed at a median of 2 days after infarction. The echocardiogram consisted of conventional and advanced measures. The end point was a composite of heart failure and/or cardiovascular death. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years, we observed 80 events in our derivation cohort. A stepwise backward Cox regression including all echocardiographic parameters identified global longitudinal strain, wall motion score index (WMSI), E/e’, and E/global strain rate e (E/GLSRe) as significant predictors of outcome. A Classification and Regression Tree analysis outlined a risk model with WMSI, GLSRe, and E/e’ as key echocardiographic parameters. Patients with WMSI ≥ 2.22 were at high risk, patients with WMSI < 2.22, GLSRe < 0.82s−1 and E/e’≥7.6 at intermediate risk, and patients with WMSI < 2.22 and GLSRe ≥ 0.82s−1 or GLSRe < 0.82s−1 and E/e’ < 7.6 at low risk of heart failure and/or cardiovascular death. When compared with the low-risk group, an incremental risk was observed (intermediate group: HR = 2.52 [1.24;5.11], p = 0.011; high-risk group: HR = 4.37 [1.40;13.66], p = 0.011). The risk model was validated in the validation cohort (C-statistic: 0.71). In conclusion, we devised an echocardiographic risk model for STEMI patients suggesting advanced and conventional measures of systolic function and filling pressures to be important for the prognosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082715740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.024

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.024

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32241549

AN - SCOPUS:85082715740

VL - 125

SP - 1461

EP - 1470

JO - Am. J. Cardiol.

JF - Am. J. Cardiol.

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 254522680