Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest. / Hansen, Mikkel T.; Grønfeldt, Birk M.; Romer, Tue; Fogelstrom, Mathilde; Sørensen, Kasper; Schmidt, Samuel E.; Helge, Jørn W.
2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). Bind 48 IEEE Press, 2021. (Computing in Cardiology, Bind 48).Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest
AU - Hansen, Mikkel T.
AU - Grønfeldt, Birk M.
AU - Romer, Tue
AU - Fogelstrom, Mathilde
AU - Sørensen, Kasper
AU - Schmidt, Samuel E.
AU - Helge, Jørn W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Creative Commons.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Introduction: Assessment of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is an important clinical tool when examining both healthy and unhealthy populations, as a low VO2max is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Aim: This study investigated the accuracy of a non-exercise test for assessment of VO2max using seismocardiography (SCG). Methods: 97 participants (20-45 years, 50 males) underwent a nonexercise test using SCG at rest in the supine position (SCG VO2max) and a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (IC VO2max). An interim analysis was applied after 50 participants had completed testing (SCG VO2max 1.0) allowing for the algorithm to be modified (SCG VO2max 2.1). Results: SCG VO2max 2.1 (n=47, test set) estimation was 3.5 pm 1.8 mlcdot min{-1}cdot kg{-1} (p < 0.001) lower compared to IC VO2max, with a Pearson correlation of r=0.65 (p < 0.0001) and a standard error of estimate of 7.1 ml·min-1 ·kg-1. The coefficient of variation between tests was 8 pm 1%. Conclusion: The accuracy of VO2max assessment using SCG requires further optimization prior to clinical application, as SCG VO2max was systematically lower than IC VO2max, and only a moderate correlation together with considerable variation were observed between tests.
AB - Introduction: Assessment of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is an important clinical tool when examining both healthy and unhealthy populations, as a low VO2max is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Aim: This study investigated the accuracy of a non-exercise test for assessment of VO2max using seismocardiography (SCG). Methods: 97 participants (20-45 years, 50 males) underwent a nonexercise test using SCG at rest in the supine position (SCG VO2max) and a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (IC VO2max). An interim analysis was applied after 50 participants had completed testing (SCG VO2max 1.0) allowing for the algorithm to be modified (SCG VO2max 2.1). Results: SCG VO2max 2.1 (n=47, test set) estimation was 3.5 pm 1.8 mlcdot min{-1}cdot kg{-1} (p < 0.001) lower compared to IC VO2max, with a Pearson correlation of r=0.65 (p < 0.0001) and a standard error of estimate of 7.1 ml·min-1 ·kg-1. The coefficient of variation between tests was 8 pm 1%. Conclusion: The accuracy of VO2max assessment using SCG requires further optimization prior to clinical application, as SCG VO2max was systematically lower than IC VO2max, and only a moderate correlation together with considerable variation were observed between tests.
U2 - 10.23919/CinC53138.2021.9662756
DO - 10.23919/CinC53138.2021.9662756
M3 - Article in proceedings
AN - SCOPUS:85124773829
VL - 48
T3 - Computing in Cardiology
BT - 2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)
PB - IEEE Press
T2 - 2021 Computing in Cardiology, CinC 2021
Y2 - 13 September 2021 through 15 September 2021
ER -
ID: 334310774