Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. / Brok, Jesper; Thorlund, Kristian; Wetterslev, Jørn; Gluud, Christian.
I: International Journal of Epidemiology, Bind 38, Nr. 1, 2008, s. 287-98.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses
AU - Brok, Jesper
AU - Thorlund, Kristian
AU - Wetterslev, Jørn
AU - Gluud, Christian
N1 - Keywords: Data Interpretation, Statistical; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Review Literature as Topic; Sample Size
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - BACKGROUND: Random error may cause misleading evidence in meta-analyses. The required number of participants in a meta-analysis (i.e. information size) should be at least as large as an adequately powered single trial. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) may reduce risk of random errors due to repetitive testing of accumulating data by evaluating meta-analyses not reaching the information size with monitoring boundaries. This is analogous to sequential monitoring boundaries in a single trial. METHODS: We selected apparently conclusive (P
AB - BACKGROUND: Random error may cause misleading evidence in meta-analyses. The required number of participants in a meta-analysis (i.e. information size) should be at least as large as an adequately powered single trial. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) may reduce risk of random errors due to repetitive testing of accumulating data by evaluating meta-analyses not reaching the information size with monitoring boundaries. This is analogous to sequential monitoring boundaries in a single trial. METHODS: We selected apparently conclusive (P
U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyn188
DO - 10.1093/ije/dyn188
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 18824466
VL - 38
SP - 287
EP - 298
JO - International Journal of Epidemiology
JF - International Journal of Epidemiology
SN - 0300-5771
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 18698965