Partially Hydrolysed Whey Has Superior Allergy Preventive Capacity Compared to Intact Whey Regardless of Amoxicillin Administration in Brown Norway Rats
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Partially Hydrolysed Whey Has Superior Allergy Preventive Capacity Compared to Intact Whey Regardless of Amoxicillin Administration in Brown Norway Rats. / Graversen, Katrine Bækby; Larsen, Jeppe Madura; Pedersen, Signe Schultz; Sørensen, Laila Vestergaard; Christoffersen, Heidi Frahm; Jacobsen, Lotte Neergaard; Halken, Susanne; Licht, Tine Rask; Bahl, Martin Iain; Bøgh, Katrine Lindholm.
In: Frontiers in Immunology, Vol. 12, 705543, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Partially Hydrolysed Whey Has Superior Allergy Preventive Capacity Compared to Intact Whey Regardless of Amoxicillin Administration in Brown Norway Rats
AU - Graversen, Katrine Bækby
AU - Larsen, Jeppe Madura
AU - Pedersen, Signe Schultz
AU - Sørensen, Laila Vestergaard
AU - Christoffersen, Heidi Frahm
AU - Jacobsen, Lotte Neergaard
AU - Halken, Susanne
AU - Licht, Tine Rask
AU - Bahl, Martin Iain
AU - Bøgh, Katrine Lindholm
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Copyright © 2021 Graversen, Larsen, Pedersen, Sørensen, Christoffersen, Jacobsen, Halken, Licht, Bahl and Bøgh.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: It remains largely unknown how physicochemical properties of hydrolysed infant formulas influence their allergy preventive capacity, and results from clinical and animal studies comparing the preventive capacity of hydrolysed infant formula with conventional infant formula are inconclusive. Thus, the use of hydrolysed infant formula for allergy prevention in atopy-prone infants is highly debated. Furthermore, knowledge on how gut microbiota influences allergy prevention remains scarce. Objective: To gain knowledge on (1) how physicochemical properties of hydrolysed whey products influence the allergy preventive capacity, (2) whether host microbiota disturbance influences allergy prevention, and (3) to what extent hydrolysed whey products influence gut microbiota composition. Methods: The preventive capacity of four different ad libitum administered whey products was investigated in Brown Norway rats with either a conventional or an amoxicillin-disturbed gut microbiota. The preventive capacity of products was evaluated as the capacity to reduce whey-specific sensitisation and allergic reactions to intact whey after intraperitoneal post-immunisations with intact whey. Additionally, the direct effect of the whey products on the growth of gut bacteria derived from healthy human infant donors was evaluated by in vitro incubation. Results: Two partially hydrolysed whey products with different physicochemical characteristics were found to be superior in preventing whey-specific sensitisation compared to intact and extensively hydrolysed whey products. Daily oral amoxicillin administration, initiated one week prior to intervention with whey products, disturbed the gut microbiota but did not impair the prevention of whey-specific sensitisation. The in vitro incubation of infant faecal samples with whey products indicated that partially hydrolysed whey products might confer a selective advantage to enterococci. Conclusions: Our results support the use of partially hydrolysed whey products for prevention of cow’s milk allergy in atopy-predisposed infants regardless of their microbiota status. However, possible direct effects of partially hydrolysed whey products on gut microbiota composition warrants further investigation.
AB - Background: It remains largely unknown how physicochemical properties of hydrolysed infant formulas influence their allergy preventive capacity, and results from clinical and animal studies comparing the preventive capacity of hydrolysed infant formula with conventional infant formula are inconclusive. Thus, the use of hydrolysed infant formula for allergy prevention in atopy-prone infants is highly debated. Furthermore, knowledge on how gut microbiota influences allergy prevention remains scarce. Objective: To gain knowledge on (1) how physicochemical properties of hydrolysed whey products influence the allergy preventive capacity, (2) whether host microbiota disturbance influences allergy prevention, and (3) to what extent hydrolysed whey products influence gut microbiota composition. Methods: The preventive capacity of four different ad libitum administered whey products was investigated in Brown Norway rats with either a conventional or an amoxicillin-disturbed gut microbiota. The preventive capacity of products was evaluated as the capacity to reduce whey-specific sensitisation and allergic reactions to intact whey after intraperitoneal post-immunisations with intact whey. Additionally, the direct effect of the whey products on the growth of gut bacteria derived from healthy human infant donors was evaluated by in vitro incubation. Results: Two partially hydrolysed whey products with different physicochemical characteristics were found to be superior in preventing whey-specific sensitisation compared to intact and extensively hydrolysed whey products. Daily oral amoxicillin administration, initiated one week prior to intervention with whey products, disturbed the gut microbiota but did not impair the prevention of whey-specific sensitisation. The in vitro incubation of infant faecal samples with whey products indicated that partially hydrolysed whey products might confer a selective advantage to enterococci. Conclusions: Our results support the use of partially hydrolysed whey products for prevention of cow’s milk allergy in atopy-predisposed infants regardless of their microbiota status. However, possible direct effects of partially hydrolysed whey products on gut microbiota composition warrants further investigation.
KW - allergy prevention
KW - cow’s milk allergy
KW - food allergy
KW - hypoallergenic infant formula
KW - IgA
KW - iTreg
KW - microbiota
KW - β-lactam antibiotic
U2 - 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705543
DO - 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705543
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34531857
AN - SCOPUS:85114893914
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Immunology
JF - Frontiers in Immunology
SN - 1664-3224
M1 - 705543
ER -
ID: 281226375