Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017. / Herskind, Kamille; Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup; Vinter, Christina Anne; Krebs, Lone; Eskildsen, Lene Friis; Broe, Anne; Pottegård, Anton; Bliddal, Mette.

I: Clinical Epidemiology, Bind 16, 2024, s. 121-130.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Herskind, K, Jensen, PB, Vinter, CA, Krebs, L, Eskildsen, LF, Broe, A, Pottegård, A & Bliddal, M 2024, 'Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017', Clinical Epidemiology, bind 16, s. 121-130. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S441123

APA

Herskind, K., Jensen, P. B., Vinter, C. A., Krebs, L., Eskildsen, L. F., Broe, A., Pottegård, A., & Bliddal, M. (2024). Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017. Clinical Epidemiology, 16, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S441123

Vancouver

Herskind K, Jensen PB, Vinter CA, Krebs L, Eskildsen LF, Broe A o.a. Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017. Clinical Epidemiology. 2024;16:121-130. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S441123

Author

Herskind, Kamille ; Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup ; Vinter, Christina Anne ; Krebs, Lone ; Eskildsen, Lene Friis ; Broe, Anne ; Pottegård, Anton ; Bliddal, Mette. / Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017. I: Clinical Epidemiology. 2024 ; Bind 16. s. 121-130.

Bibtex

@article{0f4a7a0b0fc644a7ac618b29921829ee,
title = "Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the validity of variables related to pregnancy, delivery, and key characteristics of the infant in the Danish National Patient Register using maternal medical records as the reference standard. Patients and Methods: We reviewed medical records of 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We calculated positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity to estimate the validity of 49 selected variables. Results: The PPV was ≥0.90 on most pregnancy-related variables including parity, pre-gestational BMI, diabetes disorders, and previous cesarean section, while it was lower for hypertensive disorders, especially mild to moderate preeclampsia (0.49, 95% CI 0.32–0.66). Sensitivity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00 on all pregnancy-related variables, except hypertensive disorders (sensitivity 0.38– 0.71, lowest for severe preeclampsia). On most delivery-related variables including obstetric surgical procedures (eg cesarean section and induction of labor), pharmacological pain-relief, and gestational age at delivery, PPV{\textquoteright}s ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 and the corresponding sensitivities from 0.87 to 1.00. Regarding infant-related variables, both the APGAR score registered five minutes after delivery and birthweight yielded a PPV of 1.00. Conclusion: Obstetric coding in the Danish National Patient Register shows very high validity and completeness making it a valuable source for epidemiologic research.",
keywords = "delivery, epidemiology, pregnancy, registries, sensitivity and specificity, validity",
author = "Kamille Herskind and Jensen, {Peter Bj{\o}dstrup} and Vinter, {Christina Anne} and Lone Krebs and Eskildsen, {Lene Friis} and Anne Broe and Anton Potteg{\aa}rd and Mette Bliddal",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Herskind et al.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.2147/CLEP.S441123",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "121--130",
journal = "Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "1179-1349",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017

AU - Herskind, Kamille

AU - Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup

AU - Vinter, Christina Anne

AU - Krebs, Lone

AU - Eskildsen, Lene Friis

AU - Broe, Anne

AU - Pottegård, Anton

AU - Bliddal, Mette

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Herskind et al.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the validity of variables related to pregnancy, delivery, and key characteristics of the infant in the Danish National Patient Register using maternal medical records as the reference standard. Patients and Methods: We reviewed medical records of 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We calculated positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity to estimate the validity of 49 selected variables. Results: The PPV was ≥0.90 on most pregnancy-related variables including parity, pre-gestational BMI, diabetes disorders, and previous cesarean section, while it was lower for hypertensive disorders, especially mild to moderate preeclampsia (0.49, 95% CI 0.32–0.66). Sensitivity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00 on all pregnancy-related variables, except hypertensive disorders (sensitivity 0.38– 0.71, lowest for severe preeclampsia). On most delivery-related variables including obstetric surgical procedures (eg cesarean section and induction of labor), pharmacological pain-relief, and gestational age at delivery, PPV’s ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 and the corresponding sensitivities from 0.87 to 1.00. Regarding infant-related variables, both the APGAR score registered five minutes after delivery and birthweight yielded a PPV of 1.00. Conclusion: Obstetric coding in the Danish National Patient Register shows very high validity and completeness making it a valuable source for epidemiologic research.

AB - Purpose: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the validity of variables related to pregnancy, delivery, and key characteristics of the infant in the Danish National Patient Register using maternal medical records as the reference standard. Patients and Methods: We reviewed medical records of 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We calculated positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity to estimate the validity of 49 selected variables. Results: The PPV was ≥0.90 on most pregnancy-related variables including parity, pre-gestational BMI, diabetes disorders, and previous cesarean section, while it was lower for hypertensive disorders, especially mild to moderate preeclampsia (0.49, 95% CI 0.32–0.66). Sensitivity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00 on all pregnancy-related variables, except hypertensive disorders (sensitivity 0.38– 0.71, lowest for severe preeclampsia). On most delivery-related variables including obstetric surgical procedures (eg cesarean section and induction of labor), pharmacological pain-relief, and gestational age at delivery, PPV’s ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 and the corresponding sensitivities from 0.87 to 1.00. Regarding infant-related variables, both the APGAR score registered five minutes after delivery and birthweight yielded a PPV of 1.00. Conclusion: Obstetric coding in the Danish National Patient Register shows very high validity and completeness making it a valuable source for epidemiologic research.

KW - delivery

KW - epidemiology

KW - pregnancy

KW - registries

KW - sensitivity and specificity

KW - validity

U2 - 10.2147/CLEP.S441123

DO - 10.2147/CLEP.S441123

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38404706

AN - SCOPUS:85185922139

VL - 16

SP - 121

EP - 130

JO - Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 1179-1349

ER -

ID: 384479252