Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin. / Rasmussen, D; Bremmelgaard, A; Rasmussen, F; Thorup, Jørgen Mogens.

I: Danish Medical Bulletin, Bind 33, Nr. 1, 02.1986, s. 49-51.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rasmussen, D, Bremmelgaard, A, Rasmussen, F & Thorup, JM 1986, 'Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin', Danish Medical Bulletin, bind 33, nr. 1, s. 49-51.

APA

Rasmussen, D., Bremmelgaard, A., Rasmussen, F., & Thorup, J. M. (1986). Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin. Danish Medical Bulletin, 33(1), 49-51.

Vancouver

Rasmussen D, Bremmelgaard A, Rasmussen F, Thorup JM. Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin. Danish Medical Bulletin. 1986 feb.;33(1):49-51.

Author

Rasmussen, D ; Bremmelgaard, A ; Rasmussen, F ; Thorup, Jørgen Mogens. / Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin. I: Danish Medical Bulletin. 1986 ; Bind 33, Nr. 1. s. 49-51.

Bibtex

@article{6b26c8bd30e34cae92d2be990594de8a,
title = "Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin",
abstract = "Fifty-nine patients with severe urinary tract infections were treated with either cefotaxime or ampicillin plus netilmicin in a controlled, open randomised study of the clinical and bacteriological effects. The patients responded favourably in both groups. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefotaxime against the isolates from blood were low for all bacterial strains except one (Streptococcus faecalis). Time to normalisation of temperature was significantly shorter in the cefotaxime group. The results suggest that cefotaxime is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the treatment of serious infections. However, the difference between the two groups was too small to allow preference of one procedure over the other.",
keywords = "Ampicillin, Cefotaxime, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netilmicin, Sepsis, Surgical Wound Infection, Urinary Tract Infections",
author = "D Rasmussen and A Bremmelgaard and F Rasmussen and Thorup, {J{\o}rgen Mogens}",
year = "1986",
month = feb,
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "49--51",
journal = "Danish Medical Journal",
issn = "2245-1919",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of serious urological infections with cefotaxime compared to ampicillin plus netilmicin

AU - Rasmussen, D

AU - Bremmelgaard, A

AU - Rasmussen, F

AU - Thorup, Jørgen Mogens

PY - 1986/2

Y1 - 1986/2

N2 - Fifty-nine patients with severe urinary tract infections were treated with either cefotaxime or ampicillin plus netilmicin in a controlled, open randomised study of the clinical and bacteriological effects. The patients responded favourably in both groups. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefotaxime against the isolates from blood were low for all bacterial strains except one (Streptococcus faecalis). Time to normalisation of temperature was significantly shorter in the cefotaxime group. The results suggest that cefotaxime is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the treatment of serious infections. However, the difference between the two groups was too small to allow preference of one procedure over the other.

AB - Fifty-nine patients with severe urinary tract infections were treated with either cefotaxime or ampicillin plus netilmicin in a controlled, open randomised study of the clinical and bacteriological effects. The patients responded favourably in both groups. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefotaxime against the isolates from blood were low for all bacterial strains except one (Streptococcus faecalis). Time to normalisation of temperature was significantly shorter in the cefotaxime group. The results suggest that cefotaxime is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the treatment of serious infections. However, the difference between the two groups was too small to allow preference of one procedure over the other.

KW - Ampicillin

KW - Cefotaxime

KW - Drug Therapy, Combination

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Netilmicin

KW - Sepsis

KW - Surgical Wound Infection

KW - Urinary Tract Infections

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 3948539

VL - 33

SP - 49

EP - 51

JO - Danish Medical Journal

JF - Danish Medical Journal

SN - 2245-1919

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 47629595