The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting: Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting : Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets. / Demant, Jakob Johan; Nexø, Louise Anker.

I: International Criminal Justice Review, 22.03.2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Demant, JJ & Nexø, LA 2024, 'The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting: Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets', International Criminal Justice Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677241241072

APA

Demant, J. J., & Nexø, L. A. (2024). The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting: Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets. International Criminal Justice Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677241241072

Vancouver

Demant JJ, Nexø LA. The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting: Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets. International Criminal Justice Review. 2024 mar. 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677241241072

Author

Demant, Jakob Johan ; Nexø, Louise Anker. / The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting : Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets. I: International Criminal Justice Review. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{159147e60aa84d93b35b82a27c728754,
title = "The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting: Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets",
abstract = "In the realm of cybercrime, technologies that facilitate illicit activities also produce uncertaintiesbased on the hybridity between digital communication and offline presence. Social media platformshave blurred the lines between types of drug sellers, bringing the recreational and the commercialinto the same marketplace. In the Nordic data used in this paper, 52 text-based qualitative inter-views with recreational and commercial sellers are analyzed via process and variance analysis toidentify the relationship between cognitive strategies and seller positions. We ask how sellers{\textquoteright}deci-sion-making processes differ and intersect. Theoretically, we use cognitive sociology to enrichunderstanding of culture, trust, and rational decision-making in this context. Ourfindings revealthat recreational sellers often adopt a low-risk, low-gain strategy rooted in cognitive biases, reflect-ing the recreational nature of their engagement. In contrast, commercially competent sellers employmore complex cognitive strategies, including gut feelings, thus adjusting their decisions with less reli-ance on initial assessments, leading to a more calculated approach with higher risk tolerance. Weconclude with a discussion of intervention strategies; here, we argue for the need for a dual strategythat targets and capitalizes on the differences in cognitive biases in an effective way that poses lessharm to recreational sellers.",
author = "Demant, {Jakob Johan} and Nex{\o}, {Louise Anker}",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1177/10575677241241072",
language = "English",
journal = "International Criminal Justice Review",
issn = "1057-5677",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Gut Feeling of Rational Acting

T2 - Differentiation in Cognitive Strategies Within Commercial and Recreational Sellers in Hybrid Digital Social Media Markets

AU - Demant, Jakob Johan

AU - Nexø, Louise Anker

PY - 2024/3/22

Y1 - 2024/3/22

N2 - In the realm of cybercrime, technologies that facilitate illicit activities also produce uncertaintiesbased on the hybridity between digital communication and offline presence. Social media platformshave blurred the lines between types of drug sellers, bringing the recreational and the commercialinto the same marketplace. In the Nordic data used in this paper, 52 text-based qualitative inter-views with recreational and commercial sellers are analyzed via process and variance analysis toidentify the relationship between cognitive strategies and seller positions. We ask how sellers’deci-sion-making processes differ and intersect. Theoretically, we use cognitive sociology to enrichunderstanding of culture, trust, and rational decision-making in this context. Ourfindings revealthat recreational sellers often adopt a low-risk, low-gain strategy rooted in cognitive biases, reflect-ing the recreational nature of their engagement. In contrast, commercially competent sellers employmore complex cognitive strategies, including gut feelings, thus adjusting their decisions with less reli-ance on initial assessments, leading to a more calculated approach with higher risk tolerance. Weconclude with a discussion of intervention strategies; here, we argue for the need for a dual strategythat targets and capitalizes on the differences in cognitive biases in an effective way that poses lessharm to recreational sellers.

AB - In the realm of cybercrime, technologies that facilitate illicit activities also produce uncertaintiesbased on the hybridity between digital communication and offline presence. Social media platformshave blurred the lines between types of drug sellers, bringing the recreational and the commercialinto the same marketplace. In the Nordic data used in this paper, 52 text-based qualitative inter-views with recreational and commercial sellers are analyzed via process and variance analysis toidentify the relationship between cognitive strategies and seller positions. We ask how sellers’deci-sion-making processes differ and intersect. Theoretically, we use cognitive sociology to enrichunderstanding of culture, trust, and rational decision-making in this context. Ourfindings revealthat recreational sellers often adopt a low-risk, low-gain strategy rooted in cognitive biases, reflect-ing the recreational nature of their engagement. In contrast, commercially competent sellers employmore complex cognitive strategies, including gut feelings, thus adjusting their decisions with less reli-ance on initial assessments, leading to a more calculated approach with higher risk tolerance. Weconclude with a discussion of intervention strategies; here, we argue for the need for a dual strategythat targets and capitalizes on the differences in cognitive biases in an effective way that poses lessharm to recreational sellers.

U2 - 10.1177/10575677241241072

DO - 10.1177/10575677241241072

M3 - Journal article

JO - International Criminal Justice Review

JF - International Criminal Justice Review

SN - 1057-5677

ER -

ID: 390182132