The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery : A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. / Schou, Nikolaj K.; Svensson, Lisa G.T.; Cleemann, Rasmus; Andersen, Jakob H.; Mathiesen, Ole; Maagaard, Mathias.

I: Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schou, NK, Svensson, LGT, Cleemann, R, Andersen, JH, Mathiesen, O & Maagaard, M 2024, 'The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis', Foot and Ankle Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.015

APA

Schou, N. K., Svensson, L. G. T., Cleemann, R., Andersen, J. H., Mathiesen, O., & Maagaard, M. (Accepteret/In press). The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Foot and Ankle Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.015

Vancouver

Schou NK, Svensson LGT, Cleemann R, Andersen JH, Mathiesen O, Maagaard M. The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.015

Author

Schou, Nikolaj K. ; Svensson, Lisa G.T. ; Cleemann, Rasmus ; Andersen, Jakob H. ; Mathiesen, Ole ; Maagaard, Mathias. / The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery : A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. I: Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{0ebf3462a93f4b678d003e48019a04ac,
title = "The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis",
abstract = "Background: Peripheral nerve blocks may be essential elements in a multimodal pain management regime following foot and ankle surgery. We assessed the effects of ankle blocks compared with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase for randomised clinical trials comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block for patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Our primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption. We followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook, and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Results: We included five trials (362 participants) comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block and three trials (247 participants) comparing ankle block with a sciatic nerve block. Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block (MD 431 min; 96.7% CI 208 to 654), but the evidence was very uncertain. Duration was decreased when compared with a sciatic nerve block (MD −410 min; 96.7% CI −462 to −358). The ankle block duration was probably important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain in both comparisons. Conclusions: Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block, but the evidence was very uncertain, and decrease the duration of analgesia when compared with a sciatic nerve block. The ankle block duration was probably clinically important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain.",
keywords = "Analgesia, Evidence synthesis, Pain management, Peripheral nerve block, Regional anaesthesia",
author = "Schou, {Nikolaj K.} and Svensson, {Lisa G.T.} and Rasmus Cleemann and Andersen, {Jakob H.} and Ole Mathiesen and Mathias Maagaard",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.015",
language = "English",
journal = "Foot and Ankle Surgery",
issn = "1268-7731",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery

T2 - A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

AU - Schou, Nikolaj K.

AU - Svensson, Lisa G.T.

AU - Cleemann, Rasmus

AU - Andersen, Jakob H.

AU - Mathiesen, Ole

AU - Maagaard, Mathias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Background: Peripheral nerve blocks may be essential elements in a multimodal pain management regime following foot and ankle surgery. We assessed the effects of ankle blocks compared with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase for randomised clinical trials comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block for patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Our primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption. We followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook, and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Results: We included five trials (362 participants) comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block and three trials (247 participants) comparing ankle block with a sciatic nerve block. Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block (MD 431 min; 96.7% CI 208 to 654), but the evidence was very uncertain. Duration was decreased when compared with a sciatic nerve block (MD −410 min; 96.7% CI −462 to −358). The ankle block duration was probably important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain in both comparisons. Conclusions: Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block, but the evidence was very uncertain, and decrease the duration of analgesia when compared with a sciatic nerve block. The ankle block duration was probably clinically important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain.

AB - Background: Peripheral nerve blocks may be essential elements in a multimodal pain management regime following foot and ankle surgery. We assessed the effects of ankle blocks compared with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase for randomised clinical trials comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block for patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Our primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption. We followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook, and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Results: We included five trials (362 participants) comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block and three trials (247 participants) comparing ankle block with a sciatic nerve block. Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block (MD 431 min; 96.7% CI 208 to 654), but the evidence was very uncertain. Duration was decreased when compared with a sciatic nerve block (MD −410 min; 96.7% CI −462 to −358). The ankle block duration was probably important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain in both comparisons. Conclusions: Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block, but the evidence was very uncertain, and decrease the duration of analgesia when compared with a sciatic nerve block. The ankle block duration was probably clinically important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain.

KW - Analgesia

KW - Evidence synthesis

KW - Pain management

KW - Peripheral nerve block

KW - Regional anaesthesia

U2 - 10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.015

DO - 10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.015

M3 - Review

C2 - 38492998

AN - SCOPUS:85187978965

JO - Foot and Ankle Surgery

JF - Foot and Ankle Surgery

SN - 1268-7731

ER -

ID: 388779950