Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelRådgivningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium. / EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA).

I: E F S A Journal, Bind 12, Nr. 10, 3845, 2014.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelRådgivningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) 2014, 'Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium', E F S A Journal, bind 12, nr. 10, 3845. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3845

APA

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) (2014). Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium. E F S A Journal, 12(10), [3845]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3845

Vancouver

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium. E F S A Journal. 2014;12(10). 3845. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3845

Author

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). / Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium. I: E F S A Journal. 2014 ; Bind 12, Nr. 10.

Bibtex

@article{07c0ea90b0054a1e9d736ae585a01675,
title = "Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium",
abstract = "Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) considered the evidence for setting Dietary Reference Values for chromium. Trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) has been postulated to be necessary for the efficacy of insulin in regulating the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. However, the mechanism(s) for these roles and the essential function of Cr(III) in metabolism have not been substantiated. The criteria for the essentiality of a trace element were considered. It was noted that attempts to create chromium deficiency in animal models have not produced consistent results, and that there is no evidence of essentiality of Cr(III) in animal nutrition. Evaluating the possibility of Cr(III) as an essential element for humans, the evidence from reported improvements associated with chromium supplementation in patients on total parenteral nutrition was considered to be the most convincing, but overall data do not provide sufficient information on the reversibility of the possible deficiencies and the nature of any dose–response curve in order to identify a dietary requirement for humans. The Panel concludes that no Average Requirement and no Population Reference Intake for chromium can be defined. Several studies assessed the effect of chromium supplementation on glucose and/or lipid metabolism. In the only study for which information on total chromium intake was available, there was no difference in parameters of glucose metabolism of normoglycaemic subjects between the placebo and chromium-supplemented periods. The Panel considered that there is no evidence of beneficial effects associated with chromium intake in healthy subjects. The Panel concluded that the setting of an Adequate Intake for chromium is also not appropriate.",
keywords = "Chromium, Essentiality, Dietary reference value, Chromium, Essentiality, Dietary reference value",
author = "{EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)} and Inge Tetens and Sj{\"o}din, {Anders Mikael}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3845",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "E F S A Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific Opinion on dietary reference values for chromium

AU - EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)

AU - Tetens, Inge

AU - Sjödin, Anders Mikael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) considered the evidence for setting Dietary Reference Values for chromium. Trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) has been postulated to be necessary for the efficacy of insulin in regulating the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. However, the mechanism(s) for these roles and the essential function of Cr(III) in metabolism have not been substantiated. The criteria for the essentiality of a trace element were considered. It was noted that attempts to create chromium deficiency in animal models have not produced consistent results, and that there is no evidence of essentiality of Cr(III) in animal nutrition. Evaluating the possibility of Cr(III) as an essential element for humans, the evidence from reported improvements associated with chromium supplementation in patients on total parenteral nutrition was considered to be the most convincing, but overall data do not provide sufficient information on the reversibility of the possible deficiencies and the nature of any dose–response curve in order to identify a dietary requirement for humans. The Panel concludes that no Average Requirement and no Population Reference Intake for chromium can be defined. Several studies assessed the effect of chromium supplementation on glucose and/or lipid metabolism. In the only study for which information on total chromium intake was available, there was no difference in parameters of glucose metabolism of normoglycaemic subjects between the placebo and chromium-supplemented periods. The Panel considered that there is no evidence of beneficial effects associated with chromium intake in healthy subjects. The Panel concluded that the setting of an Adequate Intake for chromium is also not appropriate.

AB - Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) considered the evidence for setting Dietary Reference Values for chromium. Trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) has been postulated to be necessary for the efficacy of insulin in regulating the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. However, the mechanism(s) for these roles and the essential function of Cr(III) in metabolism have not been substantiated. The criteria for the essentiality of a trace element were considered. It was noted that attempts to create chromium deficiency in animal models have not produced consistent results, and that there is no evidence of essentiality of Cr(III) in animal nutrition. Evaluating the possibility of Cr(III) as an essential element for humans, the evidence from reported improvements associated with chromium supplementation in patients on total parenteral nutrition was considered to be the most convincing, but overall data do not provide sufficient information on the reversibility of the possible deficiencies and the nature of any dose–response curve in order to identify a dietary requirement for humans. The Panel concludes that no Average Requirement and no Population Reference Intake for chromium can be defined. Several studies assessed the effect of chromium supplementation on glucose and/or lipid metabolism. In the only study for which information on total chromium intake was available, there was no difference in parameters of glucose metabolism of normoglycaemic subjects between the placebo and chromium-supplemented periods. The Panel considered that there is no evidence of beneficial effects associated with chromium intake in healthy subjects. The Panel concluded that the setting of an Adequate Intake for chromium is also not appropriate.

KW - Chromium

KW - Essentiality

KW - Dietary reference value

KW - Chromium

KW - Essentiality

KW - Dietary reference value

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3845

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3845

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 10

M1 - 3845

ER -

ID: 186476145