Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: insight from the PARADISE MI trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists : insight from the PARADISE MI trial. / Schou, Morten; Claggett, Brian; Miao, Zi Michael; Fernandez, Alberto; Filippatos, Gerasimos; Granger, Christopher; Jering, Karola; Maggioni, Aldo P.; McCausland, Finnian; Villota, Julio Nuñez; Rouleau, Jean Lucien; Mody, Freny Vaghaiwalla; van der Meer, Peter; Vinereanu, Dragos; McGrath, Martina; Zhou, Yinong; Mann, Douglas L.; Solomon, Scott D.; Steg, Philippe Gabriel; Braunwald, Eugene; McMurray, John J.V.; Pfeffer, Marc A.; Køber, Lars.

I: European Journal of Heart Failure, Bind 26, Nr. 1, 2024, s. 130-139.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schou, M, Claggett, B, Miao, ZM, Fernandez, A, Filippatos, G, Granger, C, Jering, K, Maggioni, AP, McCausland, F, Villota, JN, Rouleau, JL, Mody, FV, van der Meer, P, Vinereanu, D, McGrath, M, Zhou, Y, Mann, DL, Solomon, SD, Steg, PG, Braunwald, E, McMurray, JJV, Pfeffer, MA & Køber, L 2024, 'Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: insight from the PARADISE MI trial', European Journal of Heart Failure, bind 26, nr. 1, s. 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3079

APA

Schou, M., Claggett, B., Miao, Z. M., Fernandez, A., Filippatos, G., Granger, C., Jering, K., Maggioni, A. P., McCausland, F., Villota, J. N., Rouleau, J. L., Mody, F. V., van der Meer, P., Vinereanu, D., McGrath, M., Zhou, Y., Mann, D. L., Solomon, S. D., Steg, P. G., ... Køber, L. (2024). Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: insight from the PARADISE MI trial. European Journal of Heart Failure, 26(1), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3079

Vancouver

Schou M, Claggett B, Miao ZM, Fernandez A, Filippatos G, Granger C o.a. Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: insight from the PARADISE MI trial. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2024;26(1):130-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3079

Author

Schou, Morten ; Claggett, Brian ; Miao, Zi Michael ; Fernandez, Alberto ; Filippatos, Gerasimos ; Granger, Christopher ; Jering, Karola ; Maggioni, Aldo P. ; McCausland, Finnian ; Villota, Julio Nuñez ; Rouleau, Jean Lucien ; Mody, Freny Vaghaiwalla ; van der Meer, Peter ; Vinereanu, Dragos ; McGrath, Martina ; Zhou, Yinong ; Mann, Douglas L. ; Solomon, Scott D. ; Steg, Philippe Gabriel ; Braunwald, Eugene ; McMurray, John J.V. ; Pfeffer, Marc A. ; Køber, Lars. / Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists : insight from the PARADISE MI trial. I: European Journal of Heart Failure. 2024 ; Bind 26, Nr. 1. s. 130-139.

Bibtex

@article{f2e167f2ba8348c1a5391d7a59cdce83,
title = "Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: insight from the PARADISE MI trial",
abstract = "Aim: It is unknown whether safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan (an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) are affected by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients. The aim of this study was to examine whether MRA modifies safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and/or pulmonary congestion. Methods and results: Patients (n = 5661) included in the PARADISE MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs. ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI) were stratified according to MRA. Primary outcomes in this substudy were worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Safety was defined as symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalaemia >5.5 mmol/L, or permanent drug discontinuation. A total of 2338 patients (41%) were treated with MRA. Safety of ARNI compared to ramipril was not altered significantly by ± MRA, and both groups had similar increase in symptomatic hypotension with ARNI. In patients taking MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia or permanent drug discontinuation was not significantly altered by ARNI (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The effect of ARNI compared with ramipril was similar in those who were and were not taking MRA (hazard ratio [HR]MRA 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.19 and HRMRA– 0.87, 95% CI 0.71–1.05, for the primary endpoint; p = 0.51 for interaction [Clinical Endpoint Committee adjudicated]); similar findings were observed if investigator-reported endpoints were evaluated (p = 0.61 for interaction). Conclusions: Use of a MRA did not modify safety or clinical endpoints related to initiation of ARNI compared to ramipril in the post-MI setting in patients with LVSD and/or congestion.",
keywords = "ACE inhibitors, Drug adherence, Heart failure, Left ventricular dysfunction, Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, Myorcardial infarction, Sacubitril/valsartan",
author = "Morten Schou and Brian Claggett and Miao, {Zi Michael} and Alberto Fernandez and Gerasimos Filippatos and Christopher Granger and Karola Jering and Maggioni, {Aldo P.} and Finnian McCausland and Villota, {Julio Nu{\~n}ez} and Rouleau, {Jean Lucien} and Mody, {Freny Vaghaiwalla} and {van der Meer}, Peter and Dragos Vinereanu and Martina McGrath and Yinong Zhou and Mann, {Douglas L.} and Solomon, {Scott D.} and Steg, {Philippe Gabriel} and Eugene Braunwald and McMurray, {John J.V.} and Pfeffer, {Marc A.} and Lars K{\o}ber",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 European Society of Cardiology.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1002/ejhf.3079",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "130--139",
journal = "European Journal of Heart Failure",
issn = "1567-4215",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

T2 - insight from the PARADISE MI trial

AU - Schou, Morten

AU - Claggett, Brian

AU - Miao, Zi Michael

AU - Fernandez, Alberto

AU - Filippatos, Gerasimos

AU - Granger, Christopher

AU - Jering, Karola

AU - Maggioni, Aldo P.

AU - McCausland, Finnian

AU - Villota, Julio Nuñez

AU - Rouleau, Jean Lucien

AU - Mody, Freny Vaghaiwalla

AU - van der Meer, Peter

AU - Vinereanu, Dragos

AU - McGrath, Martina

AU - Zhou, Yinong

AU - Mann, Douglas L.

AU - Solomon, Scott D.

AU - Steg, Philippe Gabriel

AU - Braunwald, Eugene

AU - McMurray, John J.V.

AU - Pfeffer, Marc A.

AU - Køber, Lars

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 European Society of Cardiology.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Aim: It is unknown whether safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan (an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) are affected by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients. The aim of this study was to examine whether MRA modifies safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and/or pulmonary congestion. Methods and results: Patients (n = 5661) included in the PARADISE MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs. ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI) were stratified according to MRA. Primary outcomes in this substudy were worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Safety was defined as symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalaemia >5.5 mmol/L, or permanent drug discontinuation. A total of 2338 patients (41%) were treated with MRA. Safety of ARNI compared to ramipril was not altered significantly by ± MRA, and both groups had similar increase in symptomatic hypotension with ARNI. In patients taking MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia or permanent drug discontinuation was not significantly altered by ARNI (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The effect of ARNI compared with ramipril was similar in those who were and were not taking MRA (hazard ratio [HR]MRA 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.19 and HRMRA– 0.87, 95% CI 0.71–1.05, for the primary endpoint; p = 0.51 for interaction [Clinical Endpoint Committee adjudicated]); similar findings were observed if investigator-reported endpoints were evaluated (p = 0.61 for interaction). Conclusions: Use of a MRA did not modify safety or clinical endpoints related to initiation of ARNI compared to ramipril in the post-MI setting in patients with LVSD and/or congestion.

AB - Aim: It is unknown whether safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan (an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) are affected by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients. The aim of this study was to examine whether MRA modifies safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and/or pulmonary congestion. Methods and results: Patients (n = 5661) included in the PARADISE MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs. ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI) were stratified according to MRA. Primary outcomes in this substudy were worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Safety was defined as symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalaemia >5.5 mmol/L, or permanent drug discontinuation. A total of 2338 patients (41%) were treated with MRA. Safety of ARNI compared to ramipril was not altered significantly by ± MRA, and both groups had similar increase in symptomatic hypotension with ARNI. In patients taking MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia or permanent drug discontinuation was not significantly altered by ARNI (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The effect of ARNI compared with ramipril was similar in those who were and were not taking MRA (hazard ratio [HR]MRA 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.19 and HRMRA– 0.87, 95% CI 0.71–1.05, for the primary endpoint; p = 0.51 for interaction [Clinical Endpoint Committee adjudicated]); similar findings were observed if investigator-reported endpoints were evaluated (p = 0.61 for interaction). Conclusions: Use of a MRA did not modify safety or clinical endpoints related to initiation of ARNI compared to ramipril in the post-MI setting in patients with LVSD and/or congestion.

KW - ACE inhibitors

KW - Drug adherence

KW - Heart failure

KW - Left ventricular dysfunction

KW - Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

KW - Myorcardial infarction

KW - Sacubitril/valsartan

U2 - 10.1002/ejhf.3079

DO - 10.1002/ejhf.3079

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37933184

AN - SCOPUS:85178235825

VL - 26

SP - 130

EP - 139

JO - European Journal of Heart Failure

JF - European Journal of Heart Failure

SN - 1567-4215

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 383003811