Reverse-Engineering Touch: Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Reverse-Engineering Touch : Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation. / Middleton, Alexandra.

I: Body & Society, Bind 30, Nr. 1, 2024, s. 3-30.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Middleton, A 2024, 'Reverse-Engineering Touch: Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation', Body & Society, bind 30, nr. 1, s. 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X231223685

APA

Middleton, A. (2024). Reverse-Engineering Touch: Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation. Body & Society, 30(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X231223685

Vancouver

Middleton A. Reverse-Engineering Touch: Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation. Body & Society. 2024;30(1):3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X231223685

Author

Middleton, Alexandra. / Reverse-Engineering Touch : Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation. I: Body & Society. 2024 ; Bind 30, Nr. 1. s. 3-30.

Bibtex

@article{55e53de7bbf542cf9aa642fd038a8180,
title = "Reverse-Engineering Touch: Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation",
abstract = "At the frontier of research in neuroprosthetic limb technology, experimenters are developing systems for sensory feedback (prosthetic touch). Drawing upon two years of ethnographic fieldwork chronicling neuroprosthetic clinical trials, I interpret neurostimulation experiments as a reverse-engineering: in which efforts to engineer sensory feedback recursively inform basic scientific understanding about touch itself. In this article, I analyse reverse-engineering as technoscientific practice, phenomenological experience, and mode of knowledge-making, in which gaps between natural and artificial (or {\textquoteleft}electric{\textquoteright}) touch get sustained and undone. In tracing the ways touch becomes constructed, abstracted, and experienced – including through phantom sensations and syn-aesthetic description – I examine how multiple coinciding versions of touch get produced at the level of the nervous system. I analyse the consequences of this multiplicity on theorizations of human and nonhuman touch, haptic experience, and touching subjects, sustaining epistemological and ontological openness amid efforts to pinpoint touch as a site of knowledge-making.",
keywords = "biotechnology, body, embodiment, prosthetics, senses, social studies of science, touch",
author = "Alexandra Middleton",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1177/1357034X231223685",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "3--30",
journal = "Body & Society",
issn = "1357-034X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reverse-Engineering Touch

T2 - Sense-Making and Making Sense with Prosthetic Neurostimulation

AU - Middleton, Alexandra

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - At the frontier of research in neuroprosthetic limb technology, experimenters are developing systems for sensory feedback (prosthetic touch). Drawing upon two years of ethnographic fieldwork chronicling neuroprosthetic clinical trials, I interpret neurostimulation experiments as a reverse-engineering: in which efforts to engineer sensory feedback recursively inform basic scientific understanding about touch itself. In this article, I analyse reverse-engineering as technoscientific practice, phenomenological experience, and mode of knowledge-making, in which gaps between natural and artificial (or ‘electric’) touch get sustained and undone. In tracing the ways touch becomes constructed, abstracted, and experienced – including through phantom sensations and syn-aesthetic description – I examine how multiple coinciding versions of touch get produced at the level of the nervous system. I analyse the consequences of this multiplicity on theorizations of human and nonhuman touch, haptic experience, and touching subjects, sustaining epistemological and ontological openness amid efforts to pinpoint touch as a site of knowledge-making.

AB - At the frontier of research in neuroprosthetic limb technology, experimenters are developing systems for sensory feedback (prosthetic touch). Drawing upon two years of ethnographic fieldwork chronicling neuroprosthetic clinical trials, I interpret neurostimulation experiments as a reverse-engineering: in which efforts to engineer sensory feedback recursively inform basic scientific understanding about touch itself. In this article, I analyse reverse-engineering as technoscientific practice, phenomenological experience, and mode of knowledge-making, in which gaps between natural and artificial (or ‘electric’) touch get sustained and undone. In tracing the ways touch becomes constructed, abstracted, and experienced – including through phantom sensations and syn-aesthetic description – I examine how multiple coinciding versions of touch get produced at the level of the nervous system. I analyse the consequences of this multiplicity on theorizations of human and nonhuman touch, haptic experience, and touching subjects, sustaining epistemological and ontological openness amid efforts to pinpoint touch as a site of knowledge-making.

KW - biotechnology

KW - body

KW - embodiment

KW - prosthetics

KW - senses

KW - social studies of science

KW - touch

U2 - 10.1177/1357034X231223685

DO - 10.1177/1357034X231223685

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85182646239

VL - 30

SP - 3

EP - 30

JO - Body & Society

JF - Body & Society

SN - 1357-034X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 390404657