Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale. / Øzhayat, Esben Boeskov.

I: Clinical Oral Investigations, Bind 21, Nr. 3, 01.04.2017, s. 907-913.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Øzhayat, EB 2017, 'Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale', Clinical Oral Investigations, bind 21, nr. 3, s. 907-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0

APA

Øzhayat, E. B. (2017). Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale. Clinical Oral Investigations, 21(3), 907-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0

Vancouver

Øzhayat EB. Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2017 apr. 1;21(3):907-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0

Author

Øzhayat, Esben Boeskov. / Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale. I: Clinical Oral Investigations. 2017 ; Bind 21, Nr. 3. s. 907-913.

Bibtex

@article{66a4f7cd63084cbfa5af686660fc7ac8,
title = "Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale",
abstract = "ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI) in a population who received prosthetic replacements.Materials and methodsFifty-seven patients who received prosthetic replacement of at least one tooth by means of fixed or removable prosthesis were professionally esthetically evaluated using the PEI and the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) before and after treatment. The participants further evaluated their oral esthetics using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP-Aes) and Orofacial Esthetic Index (OES). Responsiveness was determined by calculating effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) of the change in PEI score, testing the change in PEI score in different subgroups, and correlating the change in PEI score with the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The change in PEI score was compared to the change in DAI score.ResultsThe ES and SRM were large for the change in PEI score. Patients having anterior teeth replaced had a larger improvement in PEI score compared to participants not having anterior teeth replaced. The change in PEI score was moderately but significantly correlated to the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The PEI was more consistent in responsiveness than the DAI.ConclusionsThe PEI shows sufficient responsiveness for use in longitudinal studies and for use as a follow-up measure in clinical practice.Clinical relevanceThe PEI can in a standardized manner monitor and document esthetic improvements and problems as seen by the dentist in clinical practice.",
author = "{\O}zhayat, {Esben Boeskov}",
year = "2017",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "907--913",
journal = "Clinical Oral Investigations",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale

AU - Øzhayat, Esben Boeskov

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI) in a population who received prosthetic replacements.Materials and methodsFifty-seven patients who received prosthetic replacement of at least one tooth by means of fixed or removable prosthesis were professionally esthetically evaluated using the PEI and the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) before and after treatment. The participants further evaluated their oral esthetics using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP-Aes) and Orofacial Esthetic Index (OES). Responsiveness was determined by calculating effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) of the change in PEI score, testing the change in PEI score in different subgroups, and correlating the change in PEI score with the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The change in PEI score was compared to the change in DAI score.ResultsThe ES and SRM were large for the change in PEI score. Patients having anterior teeth replaced had a larger improvement in PEI score compared to participants not having anterior teeth replaced. The change in PEI score was moderately but significantly correlated to the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The PEI was more consistent in responsiveness than the DAI.ConclusionsThe PEI shows sufficient responsiveness for use in longitudinal studies and for use as a follow-up measure in clinical practice.Clinical relevanceThe PEI can in a standardized manner monitor and document esthetic improvements and problems as seen by the dentist in clinical practice.

AB - ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI) in a population who received prosthetic replacements.Materials and methodsFifty-seven patients who received prosthetic replacement of at least one tooth by means of fixed or removable prosthesis were professionally esthetically evaluated using the PEI and the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) before and after treatment. The participants further evaluated their oral esthetics using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP-Aes) and Orofacial Esthetic Index (OES). Responsiveness was determined by calculating effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) of the change in PEI score, testing the change in PEI score in different subgroups, and correlating the change in PEI score with the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The change in PEI score was compared to the change in DAI score.ResultsThe ES and SRM were large for the change in PEI score. Patients having anterior teeth replaced had a larger improvement in PEI score compared to participants not having anterior teeth replaced. The change in PEI score was moderately but significantly correlated to the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The PEI was more consistent in responsiveness than the DAI.ConclusionsThe PEI shows sufficient responsiveness for use in longitudinal studies and for use as a follow-up measure in clinical practice.Clinical relevanceThe PEI can in a standardized manner monitor and document esthetic improvements and problems as seen by the dentist in clinical practice.

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0

DO - 10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27129583

VL - 21

SP - 907

EP - 913

JO - Clinical Oral Investigations

JF - Clinical Oral Investigations

SN - 1432-6981

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 161911611