Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Standard

Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. / Andersen, J R; Sørensen, S M; Kruse, A; Rokkjaer, M; Matzen, Peter.

I: Gut, Bind 30, Nr. 8, 1989, s. 1132-1135.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Harvard

Andersen, JR, Sørensen, SM, Kruse, A, Rokkjaer, M & Matzen, P 1989, 'Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice.', Gut, bind 30, nr. 8, s. 1132-1135. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=2475392&query_hl=31>

APA

Andersen, J. R., Sørensen, S. M., Kruse, A., Rokkjaer, M., & Matzen, P. (1989). Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. Gut, 30(8), 1132-1135. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=2475392&query_hl=31

Vancouver

Andersen JR, Sørensen SM, Kruse A, Rokkjaer M, Matzen P. Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. Gut. 1989;30(8):1132-1135.

Author

Andersen, J R ; Sørensen, S M ; Kruse, A ; Rokkjaer, M ; Matzen, Peter. / Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. I: Gut. 1989 ; Bind 30, Nr. 8. s. 1132-1135.

Bibtex

@article{f4c69a7b9c7c40d7b9c556ff0a583c1c,
title = "Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice.",
abstract = "In patients with obstructive jaundice caused by malignant stricture of the extrahepatic bile duct we compared survival time, complication rates, hospitalisation requirements, and quality of life after palliation by endoscopic endoprosthesis or bypass surgery. During diagnostic endoscopic cholangiography 50 patients were randomised to the two treatment alternatives. All 25 patients randomised to endoprosthesis were treated by this procedure, whereas only 19 of 25 patients randomised to bypass surgery underwent operative biliary-digestive anastomosis. Life table analysis revealed no difference in survival between treatment groups or randomisation groups. No differences were found when other variables were compared. We conclude, that palliation of obstructive jaundice in malignant bile duct obstruction with endoscopically introduced endoprosthesis is as effective as operative bypass.",
author = "Andersen, {J R} and S{\o}rensen, {S M} and A Kruse and M Rokkjaer and Peter Matzen",
year = "1989",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1132--1135",
journal = "Gut",
issn = "0017-5749",
publisher = "B M J Group",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice.

AU - Andersen, J R

AU - Sørensen, S M

AU - Kruse, A

AU - Rokkjaer, M

AU - Matzen, Peter

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - In patients with obstructive jaundice caused by malignant stricture of the extrahepatic bile duct we compared survival time, complication rates, hospitalisation requirements, and quality of life after palliation by endoscopic endoprosthesis or bypass surgery. During diagnostic endoscopic cholangiography 50 patients were randomised to the two treatment alternatives. All 25 patients randomised to endoprosthesis were treated by this procedure, whereas only 19 of 25 patients randomised to bypass surgery underwent operative biliary-digestive anastomosis. Life table analysis revealed no difference in survival between treatment groups or randomisation groups. No differences were found when other variables were compared. We conclude, that palliation of obstructive jaundice in malignant bile duct obstruction with endoscopically introduced endoprosthesis is as effective as operative bypass.

AB - In patients with obstructive jaundice caused by malignant stricture of the extrahepatic bile duct we compared survival time, complication rates, hospitalisation requirements, and quality of life after palliation by endoscopic endoprosthesis or bypass surgery. During diagnostic endoscopic cholangiography 50 patients were randomised to the two treatment alternatives. All 25 patients randomised to endoprosthesis were treated by this procedure, whereas only 19 of 25 patients randomised to bypass surgery underwent operative biliary-digestive anastomosis. Life table analysis revealed no difference in survival between treatment groups or randomisation groups. No differences were found when other variables were compared. We conclude, that palliation of obstructive jaundice in malignant bile duct obstruction with endoscopically introduced endoprosthesis is as effective as operative bypass.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 1132

EP - 1135

JO - Gut

JF - Gut

SN - 0017-5749

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 34189394