Normative interpretations of diversity: The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Normative interpretations of diversity : The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context. / Lægaard, Sune.

I: Ethnicities, Bind 9, Nr. 3, 2009, s. 314-333.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lægaard, S 2009, 'Normative interpretations of diversity: The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context', Ethnicities, bind 9, nr. 3, s. 314-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796809337425

APA

Lægaard, S. (2009). Normative interpretations of diversity: The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context. Ethnicities, 9(3), 314-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796809337425

Vancouver

Lægaard S. Normative interpretations of diversity: The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context. Ethnicities. 2009;9(3):314-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796809337425

Author

Lægaard, Sune. / Normative interpretations of diversity : The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context. I: Ethnicities. 2009 ; Bind 9, Nr. 3. s. 314-333.

Bibtex

@article{6d2a4fb0832d11de8bc9000ea68e967b,
title = "Normative interpretations of diversity: The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context",
abstract = "Normative interpretations of particular cases consist of normative principles or values coupled with social theoretical accounts of the empirical facts of the case. The article reviews the most prominent normative interpretations of the Muhammad cartoons controversy over the publication of drawings of the Prophet Muhammad in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. The controversy was seen as a case of freedom of expression, toleration, racism, (in)civility and (dis)respect, and the article notes different understandings of these principles and how the application of them to the controversy implied different social theoretical accounts of the case. In disagreements between different normative interpretations, appeals are often made to the {\textquoteleft}context', so it is also considered what roles {\textquoteleft}context' might play in debates over normative interpretations",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, civilitet, Muhammed tegningerne, mangfoldighed, ytringsfrihed, multikulturalisme, racisme, respekt, tolerance, civility, Danish Mohammad cartoons, diversity, freedom of expression, multiculturalism, racism, respect, toleration",
author = "Sune L{\ae}gaard",
note = "Paper id:: DOI: 10.1177/1468796809337425",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/1468796809337425",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "314--333",
journal = "Ethnicities",
issn = "1468-7968",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normative interpretations of diversity

T2 - The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context

AU - Lægaard, Sune

N1 - Paper id:: DOI: 10.1177/1468796809337425

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Normative interpretations of particular cases consist of normative principles or values coupled with social theoretical accounts of the empirical facts of the case. The article reviews the most prominent normative interpretations of the Muhammad cartoons controversy over the publication of drawings of the Prophet Muhammad in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. The controversy was seen as a case of freedom of expression, toleration, racism, (in)civility and (dis)respect, and the article notes different understandings of these principles and how the application of them to the controversy implied different social theoretical accounts of the case. In disagreements between different normative interpretations, appeals are often made to the ‘context', so it is also considered what roles ‘context' might play in debates over normative interpretations

AB - Normative interpretations of particular cases consist of normative principles or values coupled with social theoretical accounts of the empirical facts of the case. The article reviews the most prominent normative interpretations of the Muhammad cartoons controversy over the publication of drawings of the Prophet Muhammad in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. The controversy was seen as a case of freedom of expression, toleration, racism, (in)civility and (dis)respect, and the article notes different understandings of these principles and how the application of them to the controversy implied different social theoretical accounts of the case. In disagreements between different normative interpretations, appeals are often made to the ‘context', so it is also considered what roles ‘context' might play in debates over normative interpretations

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - civilitet

KW - Muhammed tegningerne

KW - mangfoldighed

KW - ytringsfrihed

KW - multikulturalisme

KW - racisme

KW - respekt

KW - tolerance

KW - civility

KW - Danish Mohammad cartoons

KW - diversity

KW - freedom of expression

KW - multiculturalism

KW - racism

KW - respect

KW - toleration

U2 - 10.1177/1468796809337425

DO - 10.1177/1468796809337425

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 314

EP - 333

JO - Ethnicities

JF - Ethnicities

SN - 1468-7968

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 13621019