Letter to the Editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningfagfællebedømt

We would like to congratulate Porcari et al. on their thorough and well-performed systematic review and meta-analysis of hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.1 However, based on existing research it is misleading to pool uterus sparing procedures in the comparison with hysterectomy. The interesting scientific question is rather: Which procedure is the best treatment of pelvic organ prolapse regardless of preservation of the uterus?
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
ISSN0020-7292
DOI
StatusAccepteret/In press - 2024

ID: 392572411