Learning to generalize seizure forecasts

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 8,53 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Marc G. Leguia
  • Vikram R. Rao
  • Thomas K. Tcheng
  • Jonas Duun-Henriksen
  • Troels W. Kjær
  • Timothée Proix
  • Maxime O. Baud

Objective: Epilepsy is characterized by spontaneous seizures that recur at unexpected times. Nonetheless, using years-long electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings, we previously found that patient-reported seizures consistently occur when interictal epileptiform activity (IEA) cyclically builds up over days. This multidien (multiday) interictal–ictal relationship, which is shared across patients, may bear phasic information for forecasting seizures, even if individual patterns of seizure timing are unknown. To test this rigorously in a large retrospective dataset, we pretrained algorithms on data recorded from a group of patients, and forecasted seizures in other, previously unseen patients. Methods: We used retrospective long-term data from participants (N = 159) in the RNS System clinical trials, including intracranial EEG recordings (icEEG), and from two participants in the UNEEG Medical clinical trial of a subscalp EEG system (sqEEG). Based on IEA detections, we extracted instantaneous multidien phases and trained generalized linear models (GLMs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to forecast the probability of seizure occurrence at a 24-h horizon. Results: With GLMs and RNNs, seizures could be forecasted above chance in 79% and 81% of previously unseen subjects with a median discrimination of area under the curve (AUC) =.70 and.69 and median Brier skill score (BSS) =.07 and.08. In direct comparison, individualized models had similar median performance (AUC =.67, BSS =.08), but for fewer subjects (60%). Moreover, calibration of pretrained models could be maintained to accommodate different seizure rates across subjects. Significance: Our findings suggest that seizure forecasting based on multidien cycles of IEA can generalize across patients, and may drastically reduce the amount of data needed to issue forecasts for individuals who recently started collecting chronic EEG data. In addition, we show that this generalization is independent of the method used to record seizures (patient-reported vs. electrographic) or IEA (icEEG vs. sqEEG).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEpilepsia
Vol/bind64
Udgave nummerS4
Sider (fra-til)S99-S113
Antal sider15
ISSN0013-9580
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
M.O.B. reports personal fees and grants from the Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering in Geneva, and has a patent application pending under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (62665486). M.O.B. holds shares with Epios, a medical device company based in Geneva. V.R.R. reports personal fees from NeuroPace, outside the submitted work. T.K.T. is an employee of NeuroPace and receives salary and stock as compensation. J.D.‐H. is an employee of UNEEG Medical. TWK consults for UNEEG Medical. Neither of the other authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.

ID: 327928713