Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis? / van der Heijde, Désirée; Landewé, Robert; Hermann, Kay-Geert; Rudwaleit, Martin; Østergaard, Mikkel; Oostveen, Ans; O'Connor, Phil; Maksymowych, Walter P; Lambert, Robert G; Lukas, Cédric; Jurik, Anne Grethe; Boers, Maarten; Baraliakos, Xenofon; Braun, Jürgen; NN, NN.

I: Journal of Rheumatology, Bind 34, Nr. 4, 2007, s. 871-3.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

van der Heijde, D, Landewé, R, Hermann, K-G, Rudwaleit, M, Østergaard, M, Oostveen, A, O'Connor, P, Maksymowych, WP, Lambert, RG, Lukas, C, Jurik, AG, Boers, M, Baraliakos, X, Braun, J & NN, NN 2007, 'Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis?', Journal of Rheumatology, bind 34, nr. 4, s. 871-3. <http://www.jrheum.com/subscribers/07/04/871.html>

APA

van der Heijde, D., Landewé, R., Hermann, K-G., Rudwaleit, M., Østergaard, M., Oostveen, A., O'Connor, P., Maksymowych, W. P., Lambert, R. G., Lukas, C., Jurik, A. G., Boers, M., Baraliakos, X., Braun, J., & NN, NN. (2007). Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis? Journal of Rheumatology, 34(4), 871-3. http://www.jrheum.com/subscribers/07/04/871.html

Vancouver

van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Hermann K-G, Rudwaleit M, Østergaard M, Oostveen A o.a. Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis? Journal of Rheumatology. 2007;34(4):871-3.

Author

van der Heijde, Désirée ; Landewé, Robert ; Hermann, Kay-Geert ; Rudwaleit, Martin ; Østergaard, Mikkel ; Oostveen, Ans ; O'Connor, Phil ; Maksymowych, Walter P ; Lambert, Robert G ; Lukas, Cédric ; Jurik, Anne Grethe ; Boers, Maarten ; Baraliakos, Xenofon ; Braun, Jürgen ; NN, NN. / Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis?. I: Journal of Rheumatology. 2007 ; Bind 34, Nr. 4. s. 871-3.

Bibtex

@article{7e480551c0244447897d2dac2df18d78,
title = "Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis?",
abstract = "This report summarizes the discussion during a module update at OMERACT 8 on scoring methods for activity in the spine on magnetic resonance imaging. The conclusion was that the 3 available scoring methods are all very good with respect to discrimination and feasibility: the Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI-a), the Berlin method (a modification of the ASspiMRI-a), and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index for Assessment of Spinal Inflammation in AS (SPARCC). All 3 methods were judged to be similar with respect to responsiveness and discrimination, although the differences in between-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were judged to be relevant (the SPARCC method provided consistently higher ICC). The Berlin and SPARCC methods were preferred most frequently. The development of a new method combining the best elements of all methods is an additional possibility.",
author = "{van der Heijde}, D{\'e}sir{\'e}e and Robert Landew{\'e} and Kay-Geert Hermann and Martin Rudwaleit and Mikkel {\O}stergaard and Ans Oostveen and Phil O'Connor and Maksymowych, {Walter P} and Lambert, {Robert G} and C{\'e}dric Lukas and Jurik, {Anne Grethe} and Maarten Boers and Xenofon Baraliakos and J{\"u}rgen Braun and NN NN",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "871--3",
journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",
issn = "0315-162X",
publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis?

AU - van der Heijde, Désirée

AU - Landewé, Robert

AU - Hermann, Kay-Geert

AU - Rudwaleit, Martin

AU - Østergaard, Mikkel

AU - Oostveen, Ans

AU - O'Connor, Phil

AU - Maksymowych, Walter P

AU - Lambert, Robert G

AU - Lukas, Cédric

AU - Jurik, Anne Grethe

AU - Boers, Maarten

AU - Baraliakos, Xenofon

AU - Braun, Jürgen

AU - NN, NN

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This report summarizes the discussion during a module update at OMERACT 8 on scoring methods for activity in the spine on magnetic resonance imaging. The conclusion was that the 3 available scoring methods are all very good with respect to discrimination and feasibility: the Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI-a), the Berlin method (a modification of the ASspiMRI-a), and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index for Assessment of Spinal Inflammation in AS (SPARCC). All 3 methods were judged to be similar with respect to responsiveness and discrimination, although the differences in between-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were judged to be relevant (the SPARCC method provided consistently higher ICC). The Berlin and SPARCC methods were preferred most frequently. The development of a new method combining the best elements of all methods is an additional possibility.

AB - This report summarizes the discussion during a module update at OMERACT 8 on scoring methods for activity in the spine on magnetic resonance imaging. The conclusion was that the 3 available scoring methods are all very good with respect to discrimination and feasibility: the Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI-a), the Berlin method (a modification of the ASspiMRI-a), and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index for Assessment of Spinal Inflammation in AS (SPARCC). All 3 methods were judged to be similar with respect to responsiveness and discrimination, although the differences in between-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were judged to be relevant (the SPARCC method provided consistently higher ICC). The Berlin and SPARCC methods were preferred most frequently. The development of a new method combining the best elements of all methods is an additional possibility.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 871

EP - 873

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

SN - 0315-162X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 34061110