Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus : a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Chai, Shangyu; Zhang, Ruya; Carr, Richard David; Deacon, Carolyn F.; Zheng, Yiman; Rajpathak, Swapnil; Chen, Jingya; Yu, Miao.

I: Frontiers in Endocrinology, Bind 14, 1203187, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Chai, S, Zhang, R, Carr, RD, Deacon, CF, Zheng, Y, Rajpathak, S, Chen, J & Yu, M 2023, 'Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis', Frontiers in Endocrinology, bind 14, 1203187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1203187

APA

Chai, S., Zhang, R., Carr, R. D., Deacon, C. F., Zheng, Y., Rajpathak, S., Chen, J., & Yu, M. (2023). Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14, [1203187]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1203187

Vancouver

Chai S, Zhang R, Carr RD, Deacon CF, Zheng Y, Rajpathak S o.a. Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023;14. 1203187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1203187

Author

Chai, Shangyu ; Zhang, Ruya ; Carr, Richard David ; Deacon, Carolyn F. ; Zheng, Yiman ; Rajpathak, Swapnil ; Chen, Jingya ; Yu, Miao. / Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus : a systematic review and meta-analysis. I: Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023 ; Bind 14.

Bibtex

@article{8cdeed993116429d9e1525dedf66d9e7,
title = "Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Aims: Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) confers a variety of metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on GIP levels in T2DM patients. Methods: Medline (PubMed), CENTER (Cochrane Library), and Embase (Ovid) were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels were obtained. For postprandial GIP, only studies with the data of GIP changes reported as the total area under the curve (AUCGIP) using a meal or oral glucose tolerance test were included. A random-effects model was used for data pooling after incorporating heterogeneity. Results: Overall, 14 RCTs with 541 T2DM patients were included. Compared to placebo/no treatment, the use of DPP4 inhibitors significantly increased the fasting GIP level (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–1.05, P<0.001; I2 = 52%) and postprandial AUCGIP (SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02–1.64, P<0.001; I2 = 65%). Influence analysis by excluding one dataset at a time showed consistent results. Sensitivity analyses only including studies with radioimmunoassay showed also consistent results (fasting GIP: SMD: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.51–1.00, P<0.001; I2 = 0%; and postprandial AUCGIP: SMD: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18–1.78, P<0.001; I2 = 54%). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that the influence of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels in T2DM patients was not significantly changed by study characteristics such as study design, patient mean age, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration, body mass index (BMI), background treatment, treatment duration, or method for postprandial GIP measurement (all P for subgroup effects <0.05). Conclusion: The use of DPP4 inhibitors effectively increases the fasting and postprandial GIP concentrations in T2DM patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022356716.",
keywords = "dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, meta-analysis, metabolism, randomized controlled trials",
author = "Shangyu Chai and Ruya Zhang and Carr, {Richard David} and Deacon, {Carolyn F.} and Yiman Zheng and Swapnil Rajpathak and Jingya Chen and Miao Yu",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2023 Chai, Zhang, Carr, Deacon, Zheng, Rajpathak, Chen and Yu.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.3389/fendo.2023.1203187",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Frontiers in Endocrinology",
issn = "1664-2392",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Chai, Shangyu

AU - Zhang, Ruya

AU - Carr, Richard David

AU - Deacon, Carolyn F.

AU - Zheng, Yiman

AU - Rajpathak, Swapnil

AU - Chen, Jingya

AU - Yu, Miao

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2023 Chai, Zhang, Carr, Deacon, Zheng, Rajpathak, Chen and Yu.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Aims: Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) confers a variety of metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on GIP levels in T2DM patients. Methods: Medline (PubMed), CENTER (Cochrane Library), and Embase (Ovid) were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels were obtained. For postprandial GIP, only studies with the data of GIP changes reported as the total area under the curve (AUCGIP) using a meal or oral glucose tolerance test were included. A random-effects model was used for data pooling after incorporating heterogeneity. Results: Overall, 14 RCTs with 541 T2DM patients were included. Compared to placebo/no treatment, the use of DPP4 inhibitors significantly increased the fasting GIP level (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–1.05, P<0.001; I2 = 52%) and postprandial AUCGIP (SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02–1.64, P<0.001; I2 = 65%). Influence analysis by excluding one dataset at a time showed consistent results. Sensitivity analyses only including studies with radioimmunoassay showed also consistent results (fasting GIP: SMD: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.51–1.00, P<0.001; I2 = 0%; and postprandial AUCGIP: SMD: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18–1.78, P<0.001; I2 = 54%). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that the influence of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels in T2DM patients was not significantly changed by study characteristics such as study design, patient mean age, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration, body mass index (BMI), background treatment, treatment duration, or method for postprandial GIP measurement (all P for subgroup effects <0.05). Conclusion: The use of DPP4 inhibitors effectively increases the fasting and postprandial GIP concentrations in T2DM patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022356716.

AB - Aims: Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) confers a variety of metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on GIP levels in T2DM patients. Methods: Medline (PubMed), CENTER (Cochrane Library), and Embase (Ovid) were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels were obtained. For postprandial GIP, only studies with the data of GIP changes reported as the total area under the curve (AUCGIP) using a meal or oral glucose tolerance test were included. A random-effects model was used for data pooling after incorporating heterogeneity. Results: Overall, 14 RCTs with 541 T2DM patients were included. Compared to placebo/no treatment, the use of DPP4 inhibitors significantly increased the fasting GIP level (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–1.05, P<0.001; I2 = 52%) and postprandial AUCGIP (SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02–1.64, P<0.001; I2 = 65%). Influence analysis by excluding one dataset at a time showed consistent results. Sensitivity analyses only including studies with radioimmunoassay showed also consistent results (fasting GIP: SMD: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.51–1.00, P<0.001; I2 = 0%; and postprandial AUCGIP: SMD: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18–1.78, P<0.001; I2 = 54%). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that the influence of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels in T2DM patients was not significantly changed by study characteristics such as study design, patient mean age, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration, body mass index (BMI), background treatment, treatment duration, or method for postprandial GIP measurement (all P for subgroup effects <0.05). Conclusion: The use of DPP4 inhibitors effectively increases the fasting and postprandial GIP concentrations in T2DM patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022356716.

KW - dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor

KW - glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

KW - meta-analysis

KW - metabolism

KW - randomized controlled trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168665306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fendo.2023.1203187

DO - 10.3389/fendo.2023.1203187

M3 - Review

C2 - 37635974

AN - SCOPUS:85168665306

VL - 14

JO - Frontiers in Endocrinology

JF - Frontiers in Endocrinology

SN - 1664-2392

M1 - 1203187

ER -

ID: 369872228