Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance: A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance : A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case. / Pozzebon, Mattia; Guldbrandtsen, Bernt; Sandøe, Peter.

I: NanoEthics, Bind 18, 6, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Pozzebon, M, Guldbrandtsen, B & Sandøe, P 2024, 'Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance: A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case', NanoEthics, bind 18, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-024-00455-8

APA

Pozzebon, M., Guldbrandtsen, B., & Sandøe, P. (2024). Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance: A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case. NanoEthics, 18, [6]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-024-00455-8

Vancouver

Pozzebon M, Guldbrandtsen B, Sandøe P. Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance: A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case. NanoEthics. 2024;18. 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-024-00455-8

Author

Pozzebon, Mattia ; Guldbrandtsen, Bernt ; Sandøe, Peter. / Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance : A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case. I: NanoEthics. 2024 ; Bind 18.

Bibtex

@article{ba8d1ae6cba044a0b444299cbd95ce2e,
title = "Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance: A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case",
abstract = "In March 2022 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a risk assessment of a recent animal gene editing proposal submitted by Acceligen{\texttrademark}. The proposal concerned the possibility of changing the cattle genome to obtain a slicker, shorter hair coat. Using CRISPR-Cas9 it was possible to introduce an intentional genomic alteration (IGA) to the prolactin receptor gene (PRLR), thereby producing PRLR-SLICK cattle. The goal was to diminish heat stress in the cattle by enhancing their heat-tolerance. With regard to unintended alterations (i.e., off-target effects), the FDA stated that the IGA posed a low, but still present, risk to animal safety. The aim of this article is to present some initial insights into the welfare issues raised by PRLR-SLICK cattle by addressing the question: Do SLICK cattle have better welfare than non-SLICK cattle when exposed to heat stress? Two potential welfare concerns are examined. The first is pleiotropy, an issue that arises when one gene affects multiple traits. Given the pleiotropic nature of prolactin, it has been suggested that the IGA for SLICK cattle may also affect their hepatic and other functions. The second concern relates not primarily to direct effects on cattle health, but rather to the indirect risk that this more heat-tolerant animal would just be used in the livestock sector under farming conditions that are such that the net welfare improvement would be non-existent.",
keywords = "Animal Welfare, Enhancement, FDA Risk Assessment, Gene Editing, Heat Stress, PRLR-SLICK Cattle, Animal Welfare, Enhancement, FDA Risk Assessment, Gene Editing, Heat Stress, PRLR-SLICK Cattle",
author = "Mattia Pozzebon and Bernt Guldbrandtsen and Peter Sand{\o}e",
note = "Funding Information: MP would like to thank the Department of Food and Resource Economics (IFRO), University of Copenhagen for kindly hosting him during the development of this paper. MP would also like to thank Wesley Dean, Shaul Duke, and Robin Engelhardt for discussing the article with him. Authors would like to thank Paul Robinson for helping in editing the English. Authors would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments. Funding Information: Open access funding provided by Universit\u00E0 degli Studi di Trieste within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Open access funding provided by Universit\u00E0 degli Studi di Trieste within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. MP\u2019s contribution was supported by \u201CProgramma Operativo Nazionale (PON) Ricerca e Innovazione 2014\u20132020\u201D, in application of the Italian Ministerial Decree (Ministry of University and Research\u2014Ministero dell\u2019Universit\u00E0 e della Ricerca MUR) n. 1061 dated August 10, 2021. ",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1007/s11569-024-00455-8",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "NanoEthics",
issn = "1871-4757",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance

T2 - A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case

AU - Pozzebon, Mattia

AU - Guldbrandtsen, Bernt

AU - Sandøe, Peter

N1 - Funding Information: MP would like to thank the Department of Food and Resource Economics (IFRO), University of Copenhagen for kindly hosting him during the development of this paper. MP would also like to thank Wesley Dean, Shaul Duke, and Robin Engelhardt for discussing the article with him. Authors would like to thank Paul Robinson for helping in editing the English. Authors would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments. Funding Information: Open access funding provided by Universit\u00E0 degli Studi di Trieste within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Open access funding provided by Universit\u00E0 degli Studi di Trieste within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. MP\u2019s contribution was supported by \u201CProgramma Operativo Nazionale (PON) Ricerca e Innovazione 2014\u20132020\u201D, in application of the Italian Ministerial Decree (Ministry of University and Research\u2014Ministero dell\u2019Universit\u00E0 e della Ricerca MUR) n. 1061 dated August 10, 2021.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - In March 2022 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a risk assessment of a recent animal gene editing proposal submitted by Acceligen™. The proposal concerned the possibility of changing the cattle genome to obtain a slicker, shorter hair coat. Using CRISPR-Cas9 it was possible to introduce an intentional genomic alteration (IGA) to the prolactin receptor gene (PRLR), thereby producing PRLR-SLICK cattle. The goal was to diminish heat stress in the cattle by enhancing their heat-tolerance. With regard to unintended alterations (i.e., off-target effects), the FDA stated that the IGA posed a low, but still present, risk to animal safety. The aim of this article is to present some initial insights into the welfare issues raised by PRLR-SLICK cattle by addressing the question: Do SLICK cattle have better welfare than non-SLICK cattle when exposed to heat stress? Two potential welfare concerns are examined. The first is pleiotropy, an issue that arises when one gene affects multiple traits. Given the pleiotropic nature of prolactin, it has been suggested that the IGA for SLICK cattle may also affect their hepatic and other functions. The second concern relates not primarily to direct effects on cattle health, but rather to the indirect risk that this more heat-tolerant animal would just be used in the livestock sector under farming conditions that are such that the net welfare improvement would be non-existent.

AB - In March 2022 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a risk assessment of a recent animal gene editing proposal submitted by Acceligen™. The proposal concerned the possibility of changing the cattle genome to obtain a slicker, shorter hair coat. Using CRISPR-Cas9 it was possible to introduce an intentional genomic alteration (IGA) to the prolactin receptor gene (PRLR), thereby producing PRLR-SLICK cattle. The goal was to diminish heat stress in the cattle by enhancing their heat-tolerance. With regard to unintended alterations (i.e., off-target effects), the FDA stated that the IGA posed a low, but still present, risk to animal safety. The aim of this article is to present some initial insights into the welfare issues raised by PRLR-SLICK cattle by addressing the question: Do SLICK cattle have better welfare than non-SLICK cattle when exposed to heat stress? Two potential welfare concerns are examined. The first is pleiotropy, an issue that arises when one gene affects multiple traits. Given the pleiotropic nature of prolactin, it has been suggested that the IGA for SLICK cattle may also affect their hepatic and other functions. The second concern relates not primarily to direct effects on cattle health, but rather to the indirect risk that this more heat-tolerant animal would just be used in the livestock sector under farming conditions that are such that the net welfare improvement would be non-existent.

KW - Animal Welfare

KW - Enhancement

KW - FDA Risk Assessment

KW - Gene Editing

KW - Heat Stress

KW - PRLR-SLICK Cattle

KW - Animal Welfare

KW - Enhancement

KW - FDA Risk Assessment

KW - Gene Editing

KW - Heat Stress

KW - PRLR-SLICK Cattle

U2 - 10.1007/s11569-024-00455-8

DO - 10.1007/s11569-024-00455-8

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85196640174

VL - 18

JO - NanoEthics

JF - NanoEthics

SN - 1871-4757

M1 - 6

ER -

ID: 396405833