Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety. / Bryde Christensen, Anne; Poulsen, Stig; Højberg, Trine Munk; Jessen, Stine Bech; Reinholt, Nina; Hvenegaard, Morten; Eskildsen, Anita; Arendt, Mikkel; Arnfred, Sidse.

I: Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Bind 31, Nr. 3, e2995, 01.05.2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bryde Christensen, A, Poulsen, S, Højberg, TM, Jessen, SB, Reinholt, N, Hvenegaard, M, Eskildsen, A, Arendt, M & Arnfred, S 2024, 'Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety', Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, bind 31, nr. 3, e2995. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2995

APA

Bryde Christensen, A., Poulsen, S., Højberg, TM., Jessen, SB., Reinholt, N., Hvenegaard, M., Eskildsen, A., Arendt, M., & Arnfred, S. (2024). Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 31(3), [e2995]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2995

Vancouver

Bryde Christensen A, Poulsen S, Højberg TM, Jessen SB, Reinholt N, Hvenegaard M o.a. Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2024 maj 1;31(3). e2995. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2995

Author

Bryde Christensen, Anne ; Poulsen, Stig ; Højberg, Trine Munk ; Jessen, Stine Bech ; Reinholt, Nina ; Hvenegaard, Morten ; Eskildsen, Anita ; Arendt, Mikkel ; Arnfred, Sidse. / Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety. I: Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2024 ; Bind 31, Nr. 3.

Bibtex

@article{272d0e9380cd4b689b55b5c7fe9964a5,
title = "Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety",
abstract = "Objective: Theoretical conceptualizations of emotion and affect regulation have a considerable common ground. However, mentalization theory considers the ability to regulate affects as being contingent on the ability to mentalize. The aim of the present study is to examine the association between emotion regulation and mentalization, operationalized as reflective functioning, in a sample of patients with depression and/or anxiety. Methods: The study used data from the TRAns-diagnostic Cognitive behavioural Therapy versus standard cognitive behavioural therapy (TRACT-RCT) trial. Patients with depression and/or anxiety (N = 291; 64.4% female; Mage = 32.2; SD = 11.0) completed the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire (ERSQ) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-6). Correlation and regression analyses were performed to determine associations of the measures of ERSQ and RFQ-6 in relation to the outcome variables, global well-being (World Health Organization Well-being Index; WHO-5) and social functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale; WSAS). Results: Overall, the patients had a reduced level of emotion regulation (MERSQ_Total = 1.77; SD = 0.59). However, only mildly impaired reflective functioning was found (MRFQ-6 = 3.57; SD = 1.26). ERSQ correlated significantly with RFQ-6 (r = −0.31), that is, more frequent use of emotion regulation strategies was associated with less hypomentalization. ERSQ was a stronger predictor of well-being and social function than RFQ-6. Conclusion: In patients with anxiety and/or depression, hypomentalization as measured by the RFQ-6 is not a major problem, but emotion regulation is. It seems that these two, theoretically related constructs, do not necessarily co-occur. Alternatively, the RFQ-6 scale might not capture the mentalization construct in a valid way. Emotion regulation strategies are highly related to symptomatology; therefore, they are likely to be an important target for psychotherapy.",
keywords = "emotion regulation, ERSQ, mentalization, psychopathology, RFQ",
author = "Anne Bryde Christensen and Stig Poulsen and Trine Munk H{\o}jberg and Stine Bech Jessen and Nina Reinholt and Morten Hvenegaard and Anita Eskildsen and Mikkel Arendt and Sidse Arnfred",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cpp.2995",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
journal = "Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy",
issn = "1063-3995",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety

AU - Bryde Christensen, Anne

AU - Poulsen, Stig

AU - Højberg, Trine Munk

AU - Jessen, Stine Bech

AU - Reinholt, Nina

AU - Hvenegaard, Morten

AU - Eskildsen, Anita

AU - Arendt, Mikkel

AU - Arnfred, Sidse

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2024/5/1

Y1 - 2024/5/1

N2 - Objective: Theoretical conceptualizations of emotion and affect regulation have a considerable common ground. However, mentalization theory considers the ability to regulate affects as being contingent on the ability to mentalize. The aim of the present study is to examine the association between emotion regulation and mentalization, operationalized as reflective functioning, in a sample of patients with depression and/or anxiety. Methods: The study used data from the TRAns-diagnostic Cognitive behavioural Therapy versus standard cognitive behavioural therapy (TRACT-RCT) trial. Patients with depression and/or anxiety (N = 291; 64.4% female; Mage = 32.2; SD = 11.0) completed the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire (ERSQ) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-6). Correlation and regression analyses were performed to determine associations of the measures of ERSQ and RFQ-6 in relation to the outcome variables, global well-being (World Health Organization Well-being Index; WHO-5) and social functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale; WSAS). Results: Overall, the patients had a reduced level of emotion regulation (MERSQ_Total = 1.77; SD = 0.59). However, only mildly impaired reflective functioning was found (MRFQ-6 = 3.57; SD = 1.26). ERSQ correlated significantly with RFQ-6 (r = −0.31), that is, more frequent use of emotion regulation strategies was associated with less hypomentalization. ERSQ was a stronger predictor of well-being and social function than RFQ-6. Conclusion: In patients with anxiety and/or depression, hypomentalization as measured by the RFQ-6 is not a major problem, but emotion regulation is. It seems that these two, theoretically related constructs, do not necessarily co-occur. Alternatively, the RFQ-6 scale might not capture the mentalization construct in a valid way. Emotion regulation strategies are highly related to symptomatology; therefore, they are likely to be an important target for psychotherapy.

AB - Objective: Theoretical conceptualizations of emotion and affect regulation have a considerable common ground. However, mentalization theory considers the ability to regulate affects as being contingent on the ability to mentalize. The aim of the present study is to examine the association between emotion regulation and mentalization, operationalized as reflective functioning, in a sample of patients with depression and/or anxiety. Methods: The study used data from the TRAns-diagnostic Cognitive behavioural Therapy versus standard cognitive behavioural therapy (TRACT-RCT) trial. Patients with depression and/or anxiety (N = 291; 64.4% female; Mage = 32.2; SD = 11.0) completed the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire (ERSQ) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-6). Correlation and regression analyses were performed to determine associations of the measures of ERSQ and RFQ-6 in relation to the outcome variables, global well-being (World Health Organization Well-being Index; WHO-5) and social functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale; WSAS). Results: Overall, the patients had a reduced level of emotion regulation (MERSQ_Total = 1.77; SD = 0.59). However, only mildly impaired reflective functioning was found (MRFQ-6 = 3.57; SD = 1.26). ERSQ correlated significantly with RFQ-6 (r = −0.31), that is, more frequent use of emotion regulation strategies was associated with less hypomentalization. ERSQ was a stronger predictor of well-being and social function than RFQ-6. Conclusion: In patients with anxiety and/or depression, hypomentalization as measured by the RFQ-6 is not a major problem, but emotion regulation is. It seems that these two, theoretically related constructs, do not necessarily co-occur. Alternatively, the RFQ-6 scale might not capture the mentalization construct in a valid way. Emotion regulation strategies are highly related to symptomatology; therefore, they are likely to be an important target for psychotherapy.

KW - emotion regulation

KW - ERSQ

KW - mentalization

KW - psychopathology

KW - RFQ

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192738169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cpp.2995

DO - 10.1002/cpp.2995

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38723660

AN - SCOPUS:85192738169

VL - 31

JO - Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

JF - Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

SN - 1063-3995

IS - 3

M1 - e2995

ER -

ID: 395869204