Effectiveness of structured group psychoeducation for people with bipolar disorder in Rwanda: A randomized open-label superiority trial
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Effectiveness of structured group psychoeducation for people with bipolar disorder in Rwanda : A randomized open-label superiority trial. / Arnbjerg, Caroline J.; Musoni-Rwililiza, Emmanuel; Rurangwa, Nelly Umulisa; Bendtsen, Maja Grønlund; Murekatete, Chantal; Gishoma, Darius; Carlsson, Jessica; Kallestrup, Per.
I: Journal of Affective Disorders, Bind 356, 2024, s. 405-413.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of structured group psychoeducation for people with bipolar disorder in Rwanda
T2 - A randomized open-label superiority trial
AU - Arnbjerg, Caroline J.
AU - Musoni-Rwililiza, Emmanuel
AU - Rurangwa, Nelly Umulisa
AU - Bendtsen, Maja Grønlund
AU - Murekatete, Chantal
AU - Gishoma, Darius
AU - Carlsson, Jessica
AU - Kallestrup, Per
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Psychoeducation is a cornerstone as an add-on to pharmacotherapy in standard care for individuals with bipolar disorder. However, evidence of the effectiveness of psychoeducation in low-resource settings is scarce. Aims: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of structured group psychoeducation versus waiting list on relapse prevention for individuals with bipolar disorder in Rwanda, a low-income country. Methods: This was a randomized open-label superiority trial. Participants aged 18 years or older with bipolar disorder were recruited at the two referral hospitals for mental health in Rwanda and randomly assigned 12 sessions of group psychoeducation or a waiting list. The program was tailored to the setting and co-designed with patients and clinicians. The follow-up period was 12 months, and the primary outcome mean number of psychiatric hospitalizations. Results: In February and March 2021, 154 participants were randomly assigned to receive group psychoeducation (n = 78) or to a waiting list (n = 76). The retention rate was high, with only three discontinuing the psychoeducation once they had received a session. Despite limited use of first-line pharmacotherapy, the psychoeducation reduced the risk of hospitalization by half during the 12-month follow-up (RR: 0.50(95 % CI 0.26–0.95)). Yet, no change in medical adherence was observed. Limitation: Weekly assessment of clinical status was not feasible. Conclusion: Structured group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder in a low-resource setting has a protective effect against readmission despite limited access to first-line pharmacotherapy. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of the program in more decentralized settings with less highly trained staff. Trial registration: NCT04671225
AB - Background: Psychoeducation is a cornerstone as an add-on to pharmacotherapy in standard care for individuals with bipolar disorder. However, evidence of the effectiveness of psychoeducation in low-resource settings is scarce. Aims: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of structured group psychoeducation versus waiting list on relapse prevention for individuals with bipolar disorder in Rwanda, a low-income country. Methods: This was a randomized open-label superiority trial. Participants aged 18 years or older with bipolar disorder were recruited at the two referral hospitals for mental health in Rwanda and randomly assigned 12 sessions of group psychoeducation or a waiting list. The program was tailored to the setting and co-designed with patients and clinicians. The follow-up period was 12 months, and the primary outcome mean number of psychiatric hospitalizations. Results: In February and March 2021, 154 participants were randomly assigned to receive group psychoeducation (n = 78) or to a waiting list (n = 76). The retention rate was high, with only three discontinuing the psychoeducation once they had received a session. Despite limited use of first-line pharmacotherapy, the psychoeducation reduced the risk of hospitalization by half during the 12-month follow-up (RR: 0.50(95 % CI 0.26–0.95)). Yet, no change in medical adherence was observed. Limitation: Weekly assessment of clinical status was not feasible. Conclusion: Structured group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder in a low-resource setting has a protective effect against readmission despite limited access to first-line pharmacotherapy. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of the program in more decentralized settings with less highly trained staff. Trial registration: NCT04671225
KW - Bipolar disorder
KW - Global mental health
KW - Low-income countries
KW - Low-resource setting
KW - Psychoeducation
KW - Psychosocial intervention
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.071
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.071
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38640974
AN - SCOPUS:85190587044
VL - 356
SP - 405
EP - 413
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
SN - 0165-0327
ER -
ID: 389506140