Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation. / van Dijken, Jan WV; Pallesen, Ulla.

2011. Abstract fra CED-IADR 2011, Budapest, Ungarn.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

van Dijken, JWV & Pallesen, U 2011, 'Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation', CED-IADR 2011, Budapest, Ungarn, 31/08/2011 - 03/09/2011.

APA

van Dijken, J. WV., & Pallesen, U. (2011). Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation. Abstract fra CED-IADR 2011, Budapest, Ungarn.

Vancouver

van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation. 2011. Abstract fra CED-IADR 2011, Budapest, Ungarn.

Author

van Dijken, Jan WV ; Pallesen, Ulla. / Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation. Abstract fra CED-IADR 2011, Budapest, Ungarn.1 s.

Bibtex

@conference{321ddaf82ffe4f35a016d1b87ccae08b,
title = "Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate in a prospective evaluation the retention of Class V compomer and hybrid resin composite restorations placed with a 1-step self etch system and cured with continuous, soft-start and pulse-delay curing. Methods: 139 Class V restorations were placed and cured at random in 60 subjects with a compomer (Dyract AP;68) or resin composite (Tetric Ceram:67) and cured for 40s with continuous, soft-start and pulse-delay modes. The restorations were evaluated with slightly modified USPHS criteria yearly during 7 years. Results: Of 135 restorations evaluated at 7 years, 29 were lost, 17 compomer (25%) and 12 Tetric Ceram (18%). The cumulative loss rates for the compomer and resin composite restorations cured with the three curing modes were. continuous cure: 26.1%/18.2%, soft-start: 22.7%/19.0%, pulse delay: 26.1%/16.7%. No statistical difference were seen between the curing modes. Conclusions: The clinical retention of Class V compomer and resin composite erosion/abrasion restorations was notinfluenced by the curing modes used.",
author = "{van Dijken}, {Jan WV} and Ulla Pallesen",
year = "2011",
month = sep,
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 31-08-2011 Through 03-09-2011",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - Effect of curing on clinical retention. A 7-year evaluation

AU - van Dijken, Jan WV

AU - Pallesen, Ulla

N1 - Conference code: 0193 (152070)

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Objective: To evaluate in a prospective evaluation the retention of Class V compomer and hybrid resin composite restorations placed with a 1-step self etch system and cured with continuous, soft-start and pulse-delay curing. Methods: 139 Class V restorations were placed and cured at random in 60 subjects with a compomer (Dyract AP;68) or resin composite (Tetric Ceram:67) and cured for 40s with continuous, soft-start and pulse-delay modes. The restorations were evaluated with slightly modified USPHS criteria yearly during 7 years. Results: Of 135 restorations evaluated at 7 years, 29 were lost, 17 compomer (25%) and 12 Tetric Ceram (18%). The cumulative loss rates for the compomer and resin composite restorations cured with the three curing modes were. continuous cure: 26.1%/18.2%, soft-start: 22.7%/19.0%, pulse delay: 26.1%/16.7%. No statistical difference were seen between the curing modes. Conclusions: The clinical retention of Class V compomer and resin composite erosion/abrasion restorations was notinfluenced by the curing modes used.

AB - Objective: To evaluate in a prospective evaluation the retention of Class V compomer and hybrid resin composite restorations placed with a 1-step self etch system and cured with continuous, soft-start and pulse-delay curing. Methods: 139 Class V restorations were placed and cured at random in 60 subjects with a compomer (Dyract AP;68) or resin composite (Tetric Ceram:67) and cured for 40s with continuous, soft-start and pulse-delay modes. The restorations were evaluated with slightly modified USPHS criteria yearly during 7 years. Results: Of 135 restorations evaluated at 7 years, 29 were lost, 17 compomer (25%) and 12 Tetric Ceram (18%). The cumulative loss rates for the compomer and resin composite restorations cured with the three curing modes were. continuous cure: 26.1%/18.2%, soft-start: 22.7%/19.0%, pulse delay: 26.1%/16.7%. No statistical difference were seen between the curing modes. Conclusions: The clinical retention of Class V compomer and resin composite erosion/abrasion restorations was notinfluenced by the curing modes used.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

Y2 - 31 August 2011 through 3 September 2011

ER -

ID: 40131649