Echo and heart failure: When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Echo and heart failure : When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides? / Modin, Daniel; Andersen, Ditte Madsen; Biering-Sørensen, Tor.

I: Echo Research and Practice, Bind 5, Nr. 2, 2018, s. R65-R79.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Modin, D, Andersen, DM & Biering-Sørensen, T 2018, 'Echo and heart failure: When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides?', Echo Research and Practice, bind 5, nr. 2, s. R65-R79. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0004

APA

Modin, D., Andersen, D. M., & Biering-Sørensen, T. (2018). Echo and heart failure: When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides? Echo Research and Practice, 5(2), R65-R79. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0004

Vancouver

Modin D, Andersen DM, Biering-Sørensen T. Echo and heart failure: When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides? Echo Research and Practice. 2018;5(2):R65-R79. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0004

Author

Modin, Daniel ; Andersen, Ditte Madsen ; Biering-Sørensen, Tor. / Echo and heart failure : When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides?. I: Echo Research and Practice. 2018 ; Bind 5, Nr. 2. s. R65-R79.

Bibtex

@article{9a0552583d854d7da59985d0f778ad17,
title = "Echo and heart failure: When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides?",
abstract = "Heart failure (HF) is a threat to public health. Heterogeneities in aetiology and phenotype complicate the diagnosis and management of HF. This is especially true when considering HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which makes up 50% of HF cases. Natriuretic peptides may aid in establishing a working diagnosis in patients suspected of HF, but echocardiography remains the optimal choice for diagnosing HF. Echocardiography provides important prognostic information in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF. Traditionally, emphasis has been put on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). LVEF is useful for both diagnosis and prognosis in HFrEF. However, echocardiography offers more than this single parameter of systolic function, and for optimal risk assessment in HFrEF, an echocardiogram evaluating systolic, diastolic, left atrial and right ventricular function is beneficial. In this assessment echocardiographic modalities such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) by 2D speckle-tracking may be useful. LVEF offers little value in HFpEF and is neither helpful for diagnosis nor prognosis. Diastolic function quantified by E/e′ and systolic function determined by GLS offer prognostic insight in HFpEF. In HFpEF, other parameters of cardiac performance such as left atrial and right ventricular function evaluated by echocardiography also contribute with prognostic information. Hence, it is important to consider the entire echocardiogram and not focus solely on systolic function. Future research should focus on combining echocardiographic parameters into risk prediction models to adopt a more personalized approach to prognosis instead of identifying yet another echocardiographic biomarker.",
keywords = "2D echocardiography, 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography, Heart failure, Mechanics",
author = "Daniel Modin and Andersen, {Ditte Madsen} and Tor Biering-S{\o}rensen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 The authors Published by Bioscientifica Ltd",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1530/ERP-18-0004",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "R65--R79",
journal = "Echo Research and Practice",
issn = "2055-0464",
publisher = "BioScientifica Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Echo and heart failure

T2 - When do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides?

AU - Modin, Daniel

AU - Andersen, Ditte Madsen

AU - Biering-Sørensen, Tor

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The authors Published by Bioscientifica Ltd

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Heart failure (HF) is a threat to public health. Heterogeneities in aetiology and phenotype complicate the diagnosis and management of HF. This is especially true when considering HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which makes up 50% of HF cases. Natriuretic peptides may aid in establishing a working diagnosis in patients suspected of HF, but echocardiography remains the optimal choice for diagnosing HF. Echocardiography provides important prognostic information in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF. Traditionally, emphasis has been put on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). LVEF is useful for both diagnosis and prognosis in HFrEF. However, echocardiography offers more than this single parameter of systolic function, and for optimal risk assessment in HFrEF, an echocardiogram evaluating systolic, diastolic, left atrial and right ventricular function is beneficial. In this assessment echocardiographic modalities such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) by 2D speckle-tracking may be useful. LVEF offers little value in HFpEF and is neither helpful for diagnosis nor prognosis. Diastolic function quantified by E/e′ and systolic function determined by GLS offer prognostic insight in HFpEF. In HFpEF, other parameters of cardiac performance such as left atrial and right ventricular function evaluated by echocardiography also contribute with prognostic information. Hence, it is important to consider the entire echocardiogram and not focus solely on systolic function. Future research should focus on combining echocardiographic parameters into risk prediction models to adopt a more personalized approach to prognosis instead of identifying yet another echocardiographic biomarker.

AB - Heart failure (HF) is a threat to public health. Heterogeneities in aetiology and phenotype complicate the diagnosis and management of HF. This is especially true when considering HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which makes up 50% of HF cases. Natriuretic peptides may aid in establishing a working diagnosis in patients suspected of HF, but echocardiography remains the optimal choice for diagnosing HF. Echocardiography provides important prognostic information in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF. Traditionally, emphasis has been put on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). LVEF is useful for both diagnosis and prognosis in HFrEF. However, echocardiography offers more than this single parameter of systolic function, and for optimal risk assessment in HFrEF, an echocardiogram evaluating systolic, diastolic, left atrial and right ventricular function is beneficial. In this assessment echocardiographic modalities such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) by 2D speckle-tracking may be useful. LVEF offers little value in HFpEF and is neither helpful for diagnosis nor prognosis. Diastolic function quantified by E/e′ and systolic function determined by GLS offer prognostic insight in HFpEF. In HFpEF, other parameters of cardiac performance such as left atrial and right ventricular function evaluated by echocardiography also contribute with prognostic information. Hence, it is important to consider the entire echocardiogram and not focus solely on systolic function. Future research should focus on combining echocardiographic parameters into risk prediction models to adopt a more personalized approach to prognosis instead of identifying yet another echocardiographic biomarker.

KW - 2D echocardiography

KW - 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography

KW - Heart failure

KW - Mechanics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065112149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1530/ERP-18-0004

DO - 10.1530/ERP-18-0004

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:85065112149

VL - 5

SP - R65-R79

JO - Echo Research and Practice

JF - Echo Research and Practice

SN - 2055-0464

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 322953499