Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own?

Publikation: Working paperForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own? / Byrne, William Hamilton; Olsen, Henrik Palmer.

Mobile Working Paper Series, 2024. s. 1-25.

Publikation: Working paperForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Byrne, WH & Olsen, HP 2024 'Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own?' Mobile Working Paper Series, s. 1-25.

APA

Byrne, W. H., & Olsen, H. P. (2024). Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own? (s. 1-25). Mobile Working Paper Series.

Vancouver

Byrne WH, Olsen HP. Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own? Mobile Working Paper Series. 2024 mar. 1, s. 1-25.

Author

Byrne, William Hamilton ; Olsen, Henrik Palmer. / Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own?. Mobile Working Paper Series, 2024. s. 1-25

Bibtex

@techreport{202106bab91f4b0a9436266a48f8ee67,
title = "Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own?",
abstract = "Doctrinal legal scholarship faces persistent challenges from empirical approaches, but such criticism rarely seeks to encounter doctrine on its own terms. In this article, we seek to excavate the theoretical and methodological basis of doctrinal legal scholarship by situating the discipline in a hermeneutic continuum between theory and practice, or law{\textquoteright}s engagement with the social world. We firstly unfold this dynamic as an exercise in methodological interpretivisim and ontological hermeneutics and then turn to explicate our analysis with examples drawn from tort law and international criminal law. We ultimately argue that law can never be strictly circumscribed as an empirical object because law cannot be disassociated from an agent{\textquoteright}s reasons, which are continuously bound up in a hermeneutic circle, and which the scholar must enter into to achieve legal understanding. Unavoidably, therefore, doctrinal legal scholarship becomes part of the very object it is investigating.",
author = "Byrne, {William Hamilton} and Olsen, {Henrik Palmer}",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "1--25",
publisher = "Mobile Working Paper Series",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Mobile Working Paper Series",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own?

AU - Byrne, William Hamilton

AU - Olsen, Henrik Palmer

PY - 2024/3/1

Y1 - 2024/3/1

N2 - Doctrinal legal scholarship faces persistent challenges from empirical approaches, but such criticism rarely seeks to encounter doctrine on its own terms. In this article, we seek to excavate the theoretical and methodological basis of doctrinal legal scholarship by situating the discipline in a hermeneutic continuum between theory and practice, or law’s engagement with the social world. We firstly unfold this dynamic as an exercise in methodological interpretivisim and ontological hermeneutics and then turn to explicate our analysis with examples drawn from tort law and international criminal law. We ultimately argue that law can never be strictly circumscribed as an empirical object because law cannot be disassociated from an agent’s reasons, which are continuously bound up in a hermeneutic circle, and which the scholar must enter into to achieve legal understanding. Unavoidably, therefore, doctrinal legal scholarship becomes part of the very object it is investigating.

AB - Doctrinal legal scholarship faces persistent challenges from empirical approaches, but such criticism rarely seeks to encounter doctrine on its own terms. In this article, we seek to excavate the theoretical and methodological basis of doctrinal legal scholarship by situating the discipline in a hermeneutic continuum between theory and practice, or law’s engagement with the social world. We firstly unfold this dynamic as an exercise in methodological interpretivisim and ontological hermeneutics and then turn to explicate our analysis with examples drawn from tort law and international criminal law. We ultimately argue that law can never be strictly circumscribed as an empirical object because law cannot be disassociated from an agent’s reasons, which are continuously bound up in a hermeneutic circle, and which the scholar must enter into to achieve legal understanding. Unavoidably, therefore, doctrinal legal scholarship becomes part of the very object it is investigating.

M3 - Working paper

SP - 1

EP - 25

BT - Doctrinal Legal Science: A Science of its Own?

PB - Mobile Working Paper Series

ER -

ID: 392718356