Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Documents

As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1346026
JournalISRN Biodiversity
Volume2016
Number of pages7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 167591083