Performance of 8- vs 16 ECG-gated reconstructions in assessing myocardial function using Rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging: Findings in a young, healthy population

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Background: Current imaging guidelines recommend using at least 16 ECG gates when performing MUGA and cardiac SPECT to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, for Rubidium-82 (82Rb) PET, 8 ECG-gated reconstructions have been a mainstay. This study investigated the implications of quantitative assessments when employing 16 gate, instead of 8 gate, reconstructions for 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Methods: The study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat MPI sessions employing 82Rb PET/CT. We report LVEF, its reserve (stress LVEF – rest LVEF), and their repeatability measures (RMS method) obtained for 8- and 16 ECG-gated reconstructions. Results: Similar LVEF and LVEF reserve estimates were found for the 8- and 16-gated reconstructions ([%] LVEF (8/16 gates): rest = 61 ± 6/64 ± 6, stress = 68 ± 7/71 ± 6, LVEF reserve (8/16 gates): 8 ± 3/6 ± 4, and all P ≥ 0.13). Similar test–retest repeatability measures were observed for rest and stress LVEF and their reserves [LVEF (8/16 gates); Rest = 4.5/4.6 (P = 0.81), Stress = 3.5/3.2 (P = 0.33), LVEF reserve = 46.7/49.3 (P = 0.13)]. Conclusion: In healthy subjects, 8 and 16 ECG gates can be used interchangeably if only volumetric assessments are desired. However, if filling and emptying rates are of interest, a minimum of 16 ECG gates should be employed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
Vol/bind30
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1406-1413
ISSN1071-3581
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreements no. 670261 (ERC Advanced Grant) and 668532 (Click-It), the Lundbeck Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Innovation Fund Denmark, the Danish Cancer Society, Arvid Nilsson Foundation, the Neye Foundation, the Research Foundation of Rigshospitalet, the Danish National Research Foundation (grant 126), the Research Council of the Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Health Authority, the Hørslev Foundation, and the John and Birthe Meyer Foundation and Research Council for Independent Research. Andreas Kjaer is a Lundbeck Foundation Professor.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

ID: 387826415