Remote rating of atopic dermatitis severity using photo-based assessments: Proof-of-concept and reliability evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Zarqa Ali
  • Kristina Melbardis Joergensen
  • Anders Daniel Andersen
  • Andrei Chiriac
  • Theis Bjerre-Christensen
  • Ionela Manole
  • Ana Maria Dutei
  • Irina Deaconescu
  • Alina Suru
  • Adina Serban
  • Ari Pall Isberg
  • Priyanka Dahiya
  • Thomsen, Simon Francis
  • John Robert Zibert

Background: Digital imaging of dermatological patients is a novel approach to remote assessment and has recently become more relevant since telehealth and remote decentralized clinical trials are gaining ground. Objective: We aimed to investigate whether photographs taken by a smartphone are of adequate quality to allow severity assessments to be made and to explore the usefulness of an established atopic dermatitis severity assessment instrument on photograph evaluation. Methods: During scheduled visits in a previously published study, the investigating doctor evaluated the severity of atopic dermatitis using the Scoring AD (SCORAD) index and took photographs of the most representative lesions (target lesions) with both a smartphone and a digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR). The photographs were then assessed by 5 dermatologists using the intensity items of the SCORAD (iSCORAD), which consists of erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts, and dryness (scale 0-3, maximum score 18). The mean iSCORAD of the photographs was calculated and compared with in-person assessments using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used for interrater reliability. Results: A total of 942 photographs from 95 patients were assessed. The iSCORAD based on smartphone photographs correlated strongly with the evaluations performed in person (iSCORAD: r=0.78, P<.001; objective SCORAD: r=0.81, P<.001; and total SCORAD: r=0.78, P<.001). For iSCORAD specifically, a Bland-Altman plot showed a difference in mean score of 1.31 for in-person and remote iSCORAD. In addition, the interrater agreement between the 5 rating dermatologists was 0.93 (95% CI 0.911-0.939). A total of 170 lesions were photographed, and the difference in mean scores was 1.32, 1.13, and 1.43 between in-person and remote evaluations based on photographs taken by a DSLR camera, a smartphone without flash, and a smartphone with flash, respectively. Conclusions: In terms of quality, remote atopic dermatitis severity assessments based on photographs are comparable to in-person assessments, and smartphone photos can be used to assess atopic dermatitis severity to a similar degree as photographs from a DSLR camera. Further, the variation in how the dermatologists in this study rated the iSCORAD based on the photographs was very low.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere24766
JournalJMIR Formative Research
Volume5
Issue number5
Number of pages8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©Zarqa Ali, Kristina Melbardis Joergensen, Anders Daniel Andersen, Andrei Chiriac, Theis Bjerre-Christensen, Ionela Manole, Ana-Maria Dutei, Irina Deaconescu, Alina Suru, Adina Serban, Ari Pall Isberg, Priyanka Dahiya, Simon Francis Thomsen, John Robert Zibert.

    Research areas

  • Agreement, Assessment, Atopic dermatitis, EASI, Eczema, Photo, Photographs, Remote assessment, SCORAD, Severity

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 280287154