The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a cross-over, controlled study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes : a cross-over, controlled study. / Karstoft, Kristian; Christensen, Camilla S; Pedersen, Bente K; Solomon, Thomas.

In: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, Vol. 99, No. 9, jc20141837, 06.06.2014, p. 3334-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Karstoft, K, Christensen, CS, Pedersen, BK & Solomon, T 2014, 'The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a cross-over, controlled study', The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, vol. 99, no. 9, jc20141837, pp. 3334-42. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1837

APA

Karstoft, K., Christensen, C. S., Pedersen, B. K., & Solomon, T. (2014). The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a cross-over, controlled study. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 99(9), 3334-42. [jc20141837]. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1837

Vancouver

Karstoft K, Christensen CS, Pedersen BK, Solomon T. The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a cross-over, controlled study. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2014 Jun 6;99(9):3334-42. jc20141837. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1837

Author

Karstoft, Kristian ; Christensen, Camilla S ; Pedersen, Bente K ; Solomon, Thomas. / The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes : a cross-over, controlled study. In: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2014 ; Vol. 99, No. 9. pp. 3334-42.

Bibtex

@article{e15c756468fb483589666863b1685b74,
title = "The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a cross-over, controlled study",
abstract = "Context: Glycemic control improves with physical activity, but the optimal exercise mode is unknown. Objective: To determine whether interval-based exercise improves postprandial glucose tolerance and free-living glycemia more than oxygen-consumption and time-duration matched continuous exercise. Design: Cross-over, controlled with trials performed in randomized order. Setting: Hospitalized and ambulatory care. Patients: Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2DM; n=10, no withdrawels). Interventions: Subjects performed three 1-hour interventions: 1) interval-walking (IW; repeated cycles of 3 minutes of slow and fast walking); 2) continuous-walking (CW); 3) Control (CON). Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured continuously to match mean VO2 between exercise sessions (∼75% VO2peak). Main Outcome Measures: A mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT; 450 kcal, 55% carbohydrate) with stable glucose isotopic tracers was provided after each intervention and glucose kinetics were measured during the following 4 hours. Free-living glycemic control was assessed for ∼32 hours following the MMTT using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Results: VO2 was well-matched between the exercise interventions. IW decreased mean and maximal incremental plasma glucose during the MMTT when compared to CON (Mean: 1.2±0.4 vs. 2.0±0.5 mmol/l, P<0.001. Maximal: 3.7±0.6 vs. 4.6±0.7 mmol/l, P=0.005) and mean when compared to CW (1.7±0.4 mmol/l, P=0.02). No differences in mean or maximal incremental plasma glucose values were seen between CW and CON. Metabolic clearance rate of glucose during the MMTT was increased in IW compared to CW (P=0.049) and CON (P<0.001). CGM mean glucose was reduced in IW compared to CW for the rest of the intervention day (8.2±0.4 vs. 9.3±0.7 mmol/l, P=0.03), whereas no differences were found between IW and CW the following day. Conclusions: One interval-based exercise session improves glycemic control in T2DM subjects when compared to an oxygen-consumption and time-duration matched continuous exercise session.",
author = "Kristian Karstoft and Christensen, {Camilla S} and Pedersen, {Bente K} and Thomas Solomon",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1210/jc.2014-1837",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "3334--42",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism",
issn = "0021-972X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes

T2 - a cross-over, controlled study

AU - Karstoft, Kristian

AU - Christensen, Camilla S

AU - Pedersen, Bente K

AU - Solomon, Thomas

PY - 2014/6/6

Y1 - 2014/6/6

N2 - Context: Glycemic control improves with physical activity, but the optimal exercise mode is unknown. Objective: To determine whether interval-based exercise improves postprandial glucose tolerance and free-living glycemia more than oxygen-consumption and time-duration matched continuous exercise. Design: Cross-over, controlled with trials performed in randomized order. Setting: Hospitalized and ambulatory care. Patients: Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2DM; n=10, no withdrawels). Interventions: Subjects performed three 1-hour interventions: 1) interval-walking (IW; repeated cycles of 3 minutes of slow and fast walking); 2) continuous-walking (CW); 3) Control (CON). Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured continuously to match mean VO2 between exercise sessions (∼75% VO2peak). Main Outcome Measures: A mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT; 450 kcal, 55% carbohydrate) with stable glucose isotopic tracers was provided after each intervention and glucose kinetics were measured during the following 4 hours. Free-living glycemic control was assessed for ∼32 hours following the MMTT using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Results: VO2 was well-matched between the exercise interventions. IW decreased mean and maximal incremental plasma glucose during the MMTT when compared to CON (Mean: 1.2±0.4 vs. 2.0±0.5 mmol/l, P<0.001. Maximal: 3.7±0.6 vs. 4.6±0.7 mmol/l, P=0.005) and mean when compared to CW (1.7±0.4 mmol/l, P=0.02). No differences in mean or maximal incremental plasma glucose values were seen between CW and CON. Metabolic clearance rate of glucose during the MMTT was increased in IW compared to CW (P=0.049) and CON (P<0.001). CGM mean glucose was reduced in IW compared to CW for the rest of the intervention day (8.2±0.4 vs. 9.3±0.7 mmol/l, P=0.03), whereas no differences were found between IW and CW the following day. Conclusions: One interval-based exercise session improves glycemic control in T2DM subjects when compared to an oxygen-consumption and time-duration matched continuous exercise session.

AB - Context: Glycemic control improves with physical activity, but the optimal exercise mode is unknown. Objective: To determine whether interval-based exercise improves postprandial glucose tolerance and free-living glycemia more than oxygen-consumption and time-duration matched continuous exercise. Design: Cross-over, controlled with trials performed in randomized order. Setting: Hospitalized and ambulatory care. Patients: Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2DM; n=10, no withdrawels). Interventions: Subjects performed three 1-hour interventions: 1) interval-walking (IW; repeated cycles of 3 minutes of slow and fast walking); 2) continuous-walking (CW); 3) Control (CON). Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured continuously to match mean VO2 between exercise sessions (∼75% VO2peak). Main Outcome Measures: A mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT; 450 kcal, 55% carbohydrate) with stable glucose isotopic tracers was provided after each intervention and glucose kinetics were measured during the following 4 hours. Free-living glycemic control was assessed for ∼32 hours following the MMTT using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Results: VO2 was well-matched between the exercise interventions. IW decreased mean and maximal incremental plasma glucose during the MMTT when compared to CON (Mean: 1.2±0.4 vs. 2.0±0.5 mmol/l, P<0.001. Maximal: 3.7±0.6 vs. 4.6±0.7 mmol/l, P=0.005) and mean when compared to CW (1.7±0.4 mmol/l, P=0.02). No differences in mean or maximal incremental plasma glucose values were seen between CW and CON. Metabolic clearance rate of glucose during the MMTT was increased in IW compared to CW (P=0.049) and CON (P<0.001). CGM mean glucose was reduced in IW compared to CW for the rest of the intervention day (8.2±0.4 vs. 9.3±0.7 mmol/l, P=0.03), whereas no differences were found between IW and CW the following day. Conclusions: One interval-based exercise session improves glycemic control in T2DM subjects when compared to an oxygen-consumption and time-duration matched continuous exercise session.

U2 - 10.1210/jc.2014-1837

DO - 10.1210/jc.2014-1837

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24905068

VL - 99

SP - 3334

EP - 3342

JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

SN - 0021-972X

IS - 9

M1 - jc20141837

ER -

ID: 113622399