Skin electroporation: effects on transgene expression, DNA persistence and local tissue environment
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Skin electroporation: effects on transgene expression, DNA persistence and local tissue environment. / Roos, Anna-Karin; Eriksson, Fredrik; Timmons, James A; Gerhardt, Josefine; Nyman, Ulrika; Gudmundsdotter, Lindvi; Bråve, Andreas; Wahren, Britta; Pisa, Pavel.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 4, No. 9, 2009, p. e7226.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Skin electroporation: effects on transgene expression, DNA persistence and local tissue environment
AU - Roos, Anna-Karin
AU - Eriksson, Fredrik
AU - Timmons, James A
AU - Gerhardt, Josefine
AU - Nyman, Ulrika
AU - Gudmundsdotter, Lindvi
AU - Bråve, Andreas
AU - Wahren, Britta
AU - Pisa, Pavel
N1 - Keywords: Animals; DNA; Electrophysiology; Electroporation; Female; Gene Therapy; Gene Transfer Techniques; Injections, Intradermal; Kinetics; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Plasmids; Skin; Transgenes
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - BACKGROUND: Electrical pulses have been used to enhance uptake of molecules into living cells for decades. This technique, often referred to as electroporation, has become an increasingly popular method to enhance in vivo DNA delivery for both gene therapy applications as well as for delivery of vaccines against both infectious diseases and cancer. In vivo electrovaccination (gene delivery followed by electroporation) is currently being investigated in several clinical trials, including DNA delivery to healthy volunteers. However, the mode of action at molecular level is not yet fully understood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This study investigates intradermal DNA electrovaccination in detail and describes the effects on expression of the vaccine antigen, plasmid persistence and the local tissue environment. Gene profiling of the vaccination site showed that the combination of DNA and electroporation induced a significant up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes. In vivo imaging of luciferase activity after electrovaccination demonstrated a rapid onset (minutes) and a long duration (months) of transgene expression. However, when the more immunogenic prostate specific antigen (PSA) was co-administered, PSA-specific T cells were induced and concurrently the luciferase expression became undetectable. Electroporation did not affect the long-term persistence of the PSA-expressing plasmid. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides important insights to how DNA delivery by intradermal electrovaccination affects the local immunological responses of the skin, transgene expression and clearance of the plasmid. As the described vaccination approach is currently being evaluated in clinical trials, the data provided will be of high significance.
AB - BACKGROUND: Electrical pulses have been used to enhance uptake of molecules into living cells for decades. This technique, often referred to as electroporation, has become an increasingly popular method to enhance in vivo DNA delivery for both gene therapy applications as well as for delivery of vaccines against both infectious diseases and cancer. In vivo electrovaccination (gene delivery followed by electroporation) is currently being investigated in several clinical trials, including DNA delivery to healthy volunteers. However, the mode of action at molecular level is not yet fully understood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This study investigates intradermal DNA electrovaccination in detail and describes the effects on expression of the vaccine antigen, plasmid persistence and the local tissue environment. Gene profiling of the vaccination site showed that the combination of DNA and electroporation induced a significant up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes. In vivo imaging of luciferase activity after electrovaccination demonstrated a rapid onset (minutes) and a long duration (months) of transgene expression. However, when the more immunogenic prostate specific antigen (PSA) was co-administered, PSA-specific T cells were induced and concurrently the luciferase expression became undetectable. Electroporation did not affect the long-term persistence of the PSA-expressing plasmid. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides important insights to how DNA delivery by intradermal electrovaccination affects the local immunological responses of the skin, transgene expression and clearance of the plasmid. As the described vaccination approach is currently being evaluated in clinical trials, the data provided will be of high significance.
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0007226
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0007226
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19789652
VL - 4
SP - e7226
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 9
ER -
ID: 18789546