Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties. / Jahangir, Sana; Esrafilian, Amir; Ebrahimi, Mohammadhossein; Stenroth, Lauri; Alkjær, Tine; Henriksen, Marius; Englund, Martin; Mononen, Mika E.; Korhonen, Rami K.; Tanska, Petri.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 160, 111800, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jahangir, S, Esrafilian, A, Ebrahimi, M, Stenroth, L, Alkjær, T, Henriksen, M, Englund, M, Mononen, ME, Korhonen, RK & Tanska, P 2023, 'Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties', Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 160, 111800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111800

APA

Jahangir, S., Esrafilian, A., Ebrahimi, M., Stenroth, L., Alkjær, T., Henriksen, M., Englund, M., Mononen, M. E., Korhonen, R. K., & Tanska, P. (2023). Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties. Journal of Biomechanics, 160, [111800]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111800

Vancouver

Jahangir S, Esrafilian A, Ebrahimi M, Stenroth L, Alkjær T, Henriksen M et al. Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties. Journal of Biomechanics. 2023;160. 111800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111800

Author

Jahangir, Sana ; Esrafilian, Amir ; Ebrahimi, Mohammadhossein ; Stenroth, Lauri ; Alkjær, Tine ; Henriksen, Marius ; Englund, Martin ; Mononen, Mika E. ; Korhonen, Rami K. ; Tanska, Petri. / Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2023 ; Vol. 160.

Bibtex

@article{0f3f360de3b342ff83cb69474f7faccb,
title = "Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties",
abstract = "ibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material models are considered state-of-the-art in modeling articular cartilage biomechanics. Yet, cartilage material parameters are often based on bovine tissue properties in computational knee joint models, although bovine properties are distinctly different from those of humans. Thus, we aimed to investigate how cartilage mechanical responses are affected in the knee joint model during walking when fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic properties of cartilage are based on human data instead of bovine. We constructed a finite element knee joint model in which tibial and femoral cartilages were modeled as fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material using either human or bovine data. Joint loading was based on subject-specific gait data. The resulting mechanical responses of knee cartilage were compared between the knee joint models with human or bovine fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic cartilage properties. Furthermore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine which fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material parameters have the greatest impact on cartilage mechanical responses in the knee joint during walking. In general, bovine cartilage properties yielded greater maximum principal stresses and fluid pressures (both up to 30%) when compared to the human cartilage properties during the loading response in both femoral and tibial cartilage sites. Cartilage mechanical responses were very sensitive to the collagen fibril-related material parameter variations during walking while they were unresponsive to proteoglycan matrix or fluid flow-related material parameter variations. Taken together, human cartilage material properties should be accounted for when the goal is to compare absolute mechanical responses of knee joint cartilage as bovine material parameters lead to substantially different cartilage mechanical responses.",
keywords = "Finite element modeling, articular cartilage, fibril-reinforced poroelastic, material properties, knee joint",
author = "Sana Jahangir and Amir Esrafilian and Mohammadhossein Ebrahimi and Lauri Stenroth and Tine Alkj{\ae}r and Marius Henriksen and Martin Englund and Mononen, {Mika E.} and Korhonen, {Rami K.} and Petri Tanska",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111800",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of the simulated knee joint mechanics to the selected human and bovine fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties

AU - Jahangir, Sana

AU - Esrafilian, Amir

AU - Ebrahimi, Mohammadhossein

AU - Stenroth, Lauri

AU - Alkjær, Tine

AU - Henriksen, Marius

AU - Englund, Martin

AU - Mononen, Mika E.

AU - Korhonen, Rami K.

AU - Tanska, Petri

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - ibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material models are considered state-of-the-art in modeling articular cartilage biomechanics. Yet, cartilage material parameters are often based on bovine tissue properties in computational knee joint models, although bovine properties are distinctly different from those of humans. Thus, we aimed to investigate how cartilage mechanical responses are affected in the knee joint model during walking when fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic properties of cartilage are based on human data instead of bovine. We constructed a finite element knee joint model in which tibial and femoral cartilages were modeled as fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material using either human or bovine data. Joint loading was based on subject-specific gait data. The resulting mechanical responses of knee cartilage were compared between the knee joint models with human or bovine fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic cartilage properties. Furthermore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine which fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material parameters have the greatest impact on cartilage mechanical responses in the knee joint during walking. In general, bovine cartilage properties yielded greater maximum principal stresses and fluid pressures (both up to 30%) when compared to the human cartilage properties during the loading response in both femoral and tibial cartilage sites. Cartilage mechanical responses were very sensitive to the collagen fibril-related material parameter variations during walking while they were unresponsive to proteoglycan matrix or fluid flow-related material parameter variations. Taken together, human cartilage material properties should be accounted for when the goal is to compare absolute mechanical responses of knee joint cartilage as bovine material parameters lead to substantially different cartilage mechanical responses.

AB - ibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material models are considered state-of-the-art in modeling articular cartilage biomechanics. Yet, cartilage material parameters are often based on bovine tissue properties in computational knee joint models, although bovine properties are distinctly different from those of humans. Thus, we aimed to investigate how cartilage mechanical responses are affected in the knee joint model during walking when fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic properties of cartilage are based on human data instead of bovine. We constructed a finite element knee joint model in which tibial and femoral cartilages were modeled as fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material using either human or bovine data. Joint loading was based on subject-specific gait data. The resulting mechanical responses of knee cartilage were compared between the knee joint models with human or bovine fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic cartilage properties. Furthermore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine which fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic material parameters have the greatest impact on cartilage mechanical responses in the knee joint during walking. In general, bovine cartilage properties yielded greater maximum principal stresses and fluid pressures (both up to 30%) when compared to the human cartilage properties during the loading response in both femoral and tibial cartilage sites. Cartilage mechanical responses were very sensitive to the collagen fibril-related material parameter variations during walking while they were unresponsive to proteoglycan matrix or fluid flow-related material parameter variations. Taken together, human cartilage material properties should be accounted for when the goal is to compare absolute mechanical responses of knee joint cartilage as bovine material parameters lead to substantially different cartilage mechanical responses.

KW - Finite element modeling

KW - articular cartilage

KW - fibril-reinforced poroelastic

KW - material properties

KW - knee joint

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111800

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111800

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37797566

VL - 160

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

M1 - 111800

ER -

ID: 367088468