Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel. / Rehfeld, Anders; Marcus Pedersen, Christian.

In: F1000Research, Vol. 11, 222, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rehfeld, A & Marcus Pedersen, C 2022, 'Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel', F1000Research, vol. 11, 222. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109279.2

APA

Rehfeld, A., & Marcus Pedersen, C. (2022). Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel. F1000Research, 11, [222]. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109279.2

Vancouver

Rehfeld A, Marcus Pedersen C. Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel. F1000Research. 2022;11. 222. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109279.2

Author

Rehfeld, Anders ; Marcus Pedersen, Christian. / Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel. In: F1000Research. 2022 ; Vol. 11.

Bibtex

@article{aa80a410b29d4eef826ef856dcd873fa,
title = "Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel",
abstract = "Opposing findings have been published on the regulation of the sperm-specific Ca 2+ channel CatSper (cation channel of sperm) in human sperm cells by the plant triterpenoids lupeol and pristimerin. While the original study on this topic found these triterpenoids to act as potent inhibitors of human CatSper, subsequent studies have failed to replicate such an inhibitory effect. It has been suggested that these issues could in part be due to purity issues and/or batch variation between the plant-derived extracts of lupeol and pristimerin obtained for the studies. The aim of this study was to elucidate this controversy by investigating the batches of lupeol and pristimerin used in our previous study with state-of-the-art 1H-, 13C- and 2D-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods to reveal potential purity and/or batch variation issues. When comparing the NMR-spectra obtained from 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR with previously published NMR-spectra for lupeol and pristimerin, we could confirm that both the lupeol and pristimerin batch were ≥95 % pure. These results confirm the validity of the findings in our previous study for lupeol and pristimerin, showing that lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of CatSper in human sperm. In conclusion, using 1H-, 13C- and 2D-NMR methods, we confirm that the lupeol and pristimerin batches used in our previous study were ≥95 % pure and thereby fail to identify any purity issues and/or batch variation that could explain the observed inability of lupeol and pristimerin to inhibit activation of CatSper in human sperm.",
keywords = "CatSper, Fertility, Lupeol, Male reproduction, Pristimerin, Sperm function",
author = "Anders Rehfeld and {Marcus Pedersen}, Christian",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Rehfeld A and Marcus Pedersen C.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.12688/f1000research.109279.2",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "F1000Research",
issn = "2046-1402",
publisher = "F1000Research",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of the human sperm CatSper Ca(2+)-channel

AU - Rehfeld, Anders

AU - Marcus Pedersen, Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Rehfeld A and Marcus Pedersen C.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Opposing findings have been published on the regulation of the sperm-specific Ca 2+ channel CatSper (cation channel of sperm) in human sperm cells by the plant triterpenoids lupeol and pristimerin. While the original study on this topic found these triterpenoids to act as potent inhibitors of human CatSper, subsequent studies have failed to replicate such an inhibitory effect. It has been suggested that these issues could in part be due to purity issues and/or batch variation between the plant-derived extracts of lupeol and pristimerin obtained for the studies. The aim of this study was to elucidate this controversy by investigating the batches of lupeol and pristimerin used in our previous study with state-of-the-art 1H-, 13C- and 2D-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods to reveal potential purity and/or batch variation issues. When comparing the NMR-spectra obtained from 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR with previously published NMR-spectra for lupeol and pristimerin, we could confirm that both the lupeol and pristimerin batch were ≥95 % pure. These results confirm the validity of the findings in our previous study for lupeol and pristimerin, showing that lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of CatSper in human sperm. In conclusion, using 1H-, 13C- and 2D-NMR methods, we confirm that the lupeol and pristimerin batches used in our previous study were ≥95 % pure and thereby fail to identify any purity issues and/or batch variation that could explain the observed inability of lupeol and pristimerin to inhibit activation of CatSper in human sperm.

AB - Opposing findings have been published on the regulation of the sperm-specific Ca 2+ channel CatSper (cation channel of sperm) in human sperm cells by the plant triterpenoids lupeol and pristimerin. While the original study on this topic found these triterpenoids to act as potent inhibitors of human CatSper, subsequent studies have failed to replicate such an inhibitory effect. It has been suggested that these issues could in part be due to purity issues and/or batch variation between the plant-derived extracts of lupeol and pristimerin obtained for the studies. The aim of this study was to elucidate this controversy by investigating the batches of lupeol and pristimerin used in our previous study with state-of-the-art 1H-, 13C- and 2D-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods to reveal potential purity and/or batch variation issues. When comparing the NMR-spectra obtained from 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR with previously published NMR-spectra for lupeol and pristimerin, we could confirm that both the lupeol and pristimerin batch were ≥95 % pure. These results confirm the validity of the findings in our previous study for lupeol and pristimerin, showing that lupeol and pristimerin do not inhibit activation of CatSper in human sperm. In conclusion, using 1H-, 13C- and 2D-NMR methods, we confirm that the lupeol and pristimerin batches used in our previous study were ≥95 % pure and thereby fail to identify any purity issues and/or batch variation that could explain the observed inability of lupeol and pristimerin to inhibit activation of CatSper in human sperm.

KW - CatSper

KW - Fertility

KW - Lupeol

KW - Male reproduction

KW - Pristimerin

KW - Sperm function

U2 - 10.12688/f1000research.109279.2

DO - 10.12688/f1000research.109279.2

M3 - Letter

C2 - 36016990

AN - SCOPUS:85136215315

VL - 11

JO - F1000Research

JF - F1000Research

SN - 2046-1402

M1 - 222

ER -

ID: 318448611