Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation. / Hermans, Astrid N.L.; Gawalko, Monika; Pluymaekers, Nikki A.H.A.; Dinh, Trang; Weijs, Bob; van Mourik, Manouk J.W.; Vorstermans, Bianca; den Uijl, Dennis W.; Opsteyn, Ludo; Snippe, Hilco; Vernooy, Kevin; Crijns, Harry J.G.M.; Linz, Dominik; Luermans, Justin G.L.M.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 329, 2021, p. 105-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hermans, ANL, Gawalko, M, Pluymaekers, NAHA, Dinh, T, Weijs, B, van Mourik, MJW, Vorstermans, B, den Uijl, DW, Opsteyn, L, Snippe, H, Vernooy, K, Crijns, HJGM, Linz, D & Luermans, JGLM 2021, 'Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation', International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 329, pp. 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.077

APA

Hermans, A. N. L., Gawalko, M., Pluymaekers, N. A. H. A., Dinh, T., Weijs, B., van Mourik, M. J. W., Vorstermans, B., den Uijl, D. W., Opsteyn, L., Snippe, H., Vernooy, K., Crijns, H. J. G. M., Linz, D., & Luermans, J. G. L. M. (2021). Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation. International Journal of Cardiology, 329, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.077

Vancouver

Hermans ANL, Gawalko M, Pluymaekers NAHA, Dinh T, Weijs B, van Mourik MJW et al. Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation. International Journal of Cardiology. 2021;329:105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.077

Author

Hermans, Astrid N.L. ; Gawalko, Monika ; Pluymaekers, Nikki A.H.A. ; Dinh, Trang ; Weijs, Bob ; van Mourik, Manouk J.W. ; Vorstermans, Bianca ; den Uijl, Dennis W. ; Opsteyn, Ludo ; Snippe, Hilco ; Vernooy, Kevin ; Crijns, Harry J.G.M. ; Linz, Dominik ; Luermans, Justin G.L.M. / Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation. In: International Journal of Cardiology. 2021 ; Vol. 329. pp. 105-112.

Bibtex

@article{b701b06fcc7d40e7b949193e2adffff2,
title = "Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation",
abstract = "Background: The utility of long-term intermittent heart rhythm monitoring after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and usability of long-term intermittent (AliveCor Kardia{\textregistered} (ACK)) versus short continuous (Holter) heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of AF recurrences after AF ablation and evaluated ACK accuracy to detect AF. Methods: Patients were provided with Holter (for ≥24 h) simultaneously with an ACK (4 weeks) used three times a day and in case of symptoms. The primary endpoint was the difference in proportion of patients diagnosed with recurrent AF by ACK as compared to Holter monitoring. Secondary endpoints were the usability (System Usability Scale and a four-item questionnaire) of ACK and Holter monitoring; and the accuracy of the ACK algorithm for AF detection. Results: Out of 126 post-ablation patients, 115 (91.3%; 35 females, median age 64.0 [58.0–68.0] years) transmitted overall 7838 ACK ECG recordings. ACK and Holter monitoring detected 29 (25.2%) and 17 (14.8%) patients with AF recurrences, respectively (p < 0.001). More than 2 weeks of ACK monitoring did not have additional diagnostic yield for detection of AF recurrences. Patients graded ACK higher than Holter monitoring and found ACK more convenient in daily usage than Holter (p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of ACK for AF detection were 95.3% and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Long-term intermittent monitoring by ACK more effectively detects AF recurrences after AF ablation and has a higher patients' usability than short continuous Holter monitoring. ACK showed a high accuracy to detect AF.",
keywords = "AliveCor, Atrial fibrillation, e-health, Holter, m-health, Telemonitoring",
author = "Hermans, {Astrid N.L.} and Monika Gawalko and Pluymaekers, {Nikki A.H.A.} and Trang Dinh and Bob Weijs and {van Mourik}, {Manouk J.W.} and Bianca Vorstermans and {den Uijl}, {Dennis W.} and Ludo Opsteyn and Hilco Snippe and Kevin Vernooy and Crijns, {Harry J.G.M.} and Dominik Linz and Luermans, {Justin G.L.M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.077",
language = "English",
volume = "329",
pages = "105--112",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation

AU - Hermans, Astrid N.L.

AU - Gawalko, Monika

AU - Pluymaekers, Nikki A.H.A.

AU - Dinh, Trang

AU - Weijs, Bob

AU - van Mourik, Manouk J.W.

AU - Vorstermans, Bianca

AU - den Uijl, Dennis W.

AU - Opsteyn, Ludo

AU - Snippe, Hilco

AU - Vernooy, Kevin

AU - Crijns, Harry J.G.M.

AU - Linz, Dominik

AU - Luermans, Justin G.L.M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: The utility of long-term intermittent heart rhythm monitoring after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and usability of long-term intermittent (AliveCor Kardia® (ACK)) versus short continuous (Holter) heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of AF recurrences after AF ablation and evaluated ACK accuracy to detect AF. Methods: Patients were provided with Holter (for ≥24 h) simultaneously with an ACK (4 weeks) used three times a day and in case of symptoms. The primary endpoint was the difference in proportion of patients diagnosed with recurrent AF by ACK as compared to Holter monitoring. Secondary endpoints were the usability (System Usability Scale and a four-item questionnaire) of ACK and Holter monitoring; and the accuracy of the ACK algorithm for AF detection. Results: Out of 126 post-ablation patients, 115 (91.3%; 35 females, median age 64.0 [58.0–68.0] years) transmitted overall 7838 ACK ECG recordings. ACK and Holter monitoring detected 29 (25.2%) and 17 (14.8%) patients with AF recurrences, respectively (p < 0.001). More than 2 weeks of ACK monitoring did not have additional diagnostic yield for detection of AF recurrences. Patients graded ACK higher than Holter monitoring and found ACK more convenient in daily usage than Holter (p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of ACK for AF detection were 95.3% and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Long-term intermittent monitoring by ACK more effectively detects AF recurrences after AF ablation and has a higher patients' usability than short continuous Holter monitoring. ACK showed a high accuracy to detect AF.

AB - Background: The utility of long-term intermittent heart rhythm monitoring after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and usability of long-term intermittent (AliveCor Kardia® (ACK)) versus short continuous (Holter) heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of AF recurrences after AF ablation and evaluated ACK accuracy to detect AF. Methods: Patients were provided with Holter (for ≥24 h) simultaneously with an ACK (4 weeks) used three times a day and in case of symptoms. The primary endpoint was the difference in proportion of patients diagnosed with recurrent AF by ACK as compared to Holter monitoring. Secondary endpoints were the usability (System Usability Scale and a four-item questionnaire) of ACK and Holter monitoring; and the accuracy of the ACK algorithm for AF detection. Results: Out of 126 post-ablation patients, 115 (91.3%; 35 females, median age 64.0 [58.0–68.0] years) transmitted overall 7838 ACK ECG recordings. ACK and Holter monitoring detected 29 (25.2%) and 17 (14.8%) patients with AF recurrences, respectively (p < 0.001). More than 2 weeks of ACK monitoring did not have additional diagnostic yield for detection of AF recurrences. Patients graded ACK higher than Holter monitoring and found ACK more convenient in daily usage than Holter (p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of ACK for AF detection were 95.3% and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Long-term intermittent monitoring by ACK more effectively detects AF recurrences after AF ablation and has a higher patients' usability than short continuous Holter monitoring. ACK showed a high accuracy to detect AF.

KW - AliveCor

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - e-health

KW - Holter

KW - m-health

KW - Telemonitoring

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.077

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.077

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33412184

AN - SCOPUS:85099373104

VL - 329

SP - 105

EP - 112

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

ER -

ID: 280283806