Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma. / Nedergaard, Mette Kjoelhede; Michaelsen, Signe Regner; Perryman, Lara; Erler, Janine; Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard; Stockhausen, Marie-Thérése; Lassen, Ulrik; Kjaer, Andreas.

In: Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 03.2016, p. 198-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nedergaard, MK, Michaelsen, SR, Perryman, L, Erler, J, Poulsen, HS, Stockhausen, M-T, Lassen, U & Kjaer, A 2016, 'Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma', Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.12.002

APA

Nedergaard, M. K., Michaelsen, S. R., Perryman, L., Erler, J., Poulsen, H. S., Stockhausen, M-T., Lassen, U., & Kjaer, A. (2016). Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma. Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 43(3), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.12.002

Vancouver

Nedergaard MK, Michaelsen SR, Perryman L, Erler J, Poulsen HS, Stockhausen M-T et al. Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2016 Mar;43(3):198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.12.002

Author

Nedergaard, Mette Kjoelhede ; Michaelsen, Signe Regner ; Perryman, Lara ; Erler, Janine ; Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard ; Stockhausen, Marie-Thérése ; Lassen, Ulrik ; Kjaer, Andreas. / Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma. In: Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 198-205.

Bibtex

@article{ea9705dd996c45c3b180383abd124cc5,
title = "Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and thymidine analogue 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) are widely used for positron emission tomography (PET) brain tumor imaging; however, comparative studies are scarce. The aim of this study therefore was to compare FLT and FET PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF response in glioblastoma xenografts.METHODS: Xenografts with confirmed intracranial glioblastoma were treated with anti-VEGF therapy (B20-4.1) or saline as control. Weekly bioluminescence imaging (BLI), FLT and FET PET/CT were used to follow treatment response. Tracer uptake of FLT and FET was quantified using maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs). Survival, the Ki67 proliferation index and micro-vessel density (MVD) were evaluated.RESULTS: In contrast to FLT TBRs, FET TBRs were significantly lower as early as one week after treatment initiation in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. Following two weeks of treatment, both FLT and FET TBRs were significantly lower in the anti-VEGF group. In contrast, no significant difference between the treatment groups was detected using BLI. Furthermore, we found a significantly lower MVD in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. However, we found no difference in the Ki67 proliferation index or mean survival time.CONCLUSION: FET appears to be a more sensitive tracer than FLT to measure early response to anti-VEGF therapy with PET. Advances in knowledge and implications for patient care FET PET appears to be an early predictor of anti-VEGF efficacy. Confirmation of these results in clinical studies is needed.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Nedergaard, {Mette Kjoelhede} and Michaelsen, {Signe Regner} and Lara Perryman and Janine Erler and Poulsen, {Hans Skovgaard} and Marie-Th{\'e}r{\'e}se Stockhausen and Ulrik Lassen and Andreas Kjaer",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "198--205",
journal = "Nuclear Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0969-8051",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma

AU - Nedergaard, Mette Kjoelhede

AU - Michaelsen, Signe Regner

AU - Perryman, Lara

AU - Erler, Janine

AU - Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard

AU - Stockhausen, Marie-Thérése

AU - Lassen, Ulrik

AU - Kjaer, Andreas

N1 - Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: The radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and thymidine analogue 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) are widely used for positron emission tomography (PET) brain tumor imaging; however, comparative studies are scarce. The aim of this study therefore was to compare FLT and FET PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF response in glioblastoma xenografts.METHODS: Xenografts with confirmed intracranial glioblastoma were treated with anti-VEGF therapy (B20-4.1) or saline as control. Weekly bioluminescence imaging (BLI), FLT and FET PET/CT were used to follow treatment response. Tracer uptake of FLT and FET was quantified using maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs). Survival, the Ki67 proliferation index and micro-vessel density (MVD) were evaluated.RESULTS: In contrast to FLT TBRs, FET TBRs were significantly lower as early as one week after treatment initiation in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. Following two weeks of treatment, both FLT and FET TBRs were significantly lower in the anti-VEGF group. In contrast, no significant difference between the treatment groups was detected using BLI. Furthermore, we found a significantly lower MVD in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. However, we found no difference in the Ki67 proliferation index or mean survival time.CONCLUSION: FET appears to be a more sensitive tracer than FLT to measure early response to anti-VEGF therapy with PET. Advances in knowledge and implications for patient care FET PET appears to be an early predictor of anti-VEGF efficacy. Confirmation of these results in clinical studies is needed.

AB - BACKGROUND: The radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and thymidine analogue 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) are widely used for positron emission tomography (PET) brain tumor imaging; however, comparative studies are scarce. The aim of this study therefore was to compare FLT and FET PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF response in glioblastoma xenografts.METHODS: Xenografts with confirmed intracranial glioblastoma were treated with anti-VEGF therapy (B20-4.1) or saline as control. Weekly bioluminescence imaging (BLI), FLT and FET PET/CT were used to follow treatment response. Tracer uptake of FLT and FET was quantified using maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs). Survival, the Ki67 proliferation index and micro-vessel density (MVD) were evaluated.RESULTS: In contrast to FLT TBRs, FET TBRs were significantly lower as early as one week after treatment initiation in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. Following two weeks of treatment, both FLT and FET TBRs were significantly lower in the anti-VEGF group. In contrast, no significant difference between the treatment groups was detected using BLI. Furthermore, we found a significantly lower MVD in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. However, we found no difference in the Ki67 proliferation index or mean survival time.CONCLUSION: FET appears to be a more sensitive tracer than FLT to measure early response to anti-VEGF therapy with PET. Advances in knowledge and implications for patient care FET PET appears to be an early predictor of anti-VEGF efficacy. Confirmation of these results in clinical studies is needed.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.12.002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26924500

VL - 43

SP - 198

EP - 205

JO - Nuclear Medicine and Biology

JF - Nuclear Medicine and Biology

SN - 0969-8051

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 164971922