Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies. / Toksvang, Linea Natalie; Berg, Ronan M G.

In: MEFANET Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2014, p. 51-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Toksvang, LN & Berg, RMG 2014, 'Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies', MEFANET Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 51-55.

APA

Toksvang, L. N., & Berg, R. M. G. (2014). Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies. MEFANET Journal, 2(2), 51-55.

Vancouver

Toksvang LN, Berg RMG. Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies. MEFANET Journal. 2014;2(2):51-55.

Author

Toksvang, Linea Natalie ; Berg, Ronan M G. / Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies. In: MEFANET Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 51-55.

Bibtex

@article{bc9b27dd2e4e419d845e3c22f9423104,
title = "Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies",
abstract = "Abstract — We evaluated whether a classic article on haemorheology would\r\nlead to better learning when integrated with a collaborative rather than an individual\r\nteaching strategy in the undergraduate physiology classroom setting. A total\r\nof 88 2nd-year medical students were randomised to solve assignments based on\r\nthe classic article individually (n = 42) or in groups (n = 46) during a 45-minute\r\nlesson on basic haemorheology. At the end of the lesson, students completed a test\r\nand an evaluation form. There were no differences between the two intervention\r\ngroups with regard to the total test score, but students who had worked in groups\r\nrated their own effort during the lesson higher. In the present study, a collaborative\r\nteaching strategy did not lead to higher test scores than an individual teaching\r\nstrategy. However, our findings suggest that students working in groups may\r\nfeel a greater level of involvement during class.",
author = "Toksvang, {Linea Natalie} and Berg, {Ronan M G}",
year = "2014",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "2",
pages = "51--55",
journal = "MEFANET Journal",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching basic haemorheology to medical students by individual and collaborative strategies

AU - Toksvang, Linea Natalie

AU - Berg, Ronan M G

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Abstract — We evaluated whether a classic article on haemorheology would\r\nlead to better learning when integrated with a collaborative rather than an individual\r\nteaching strategy in the undergraduate physiology classroom setting. A total\r\nof 88 2nd-year medical students were randomised to solve assignments based on\r\nthe classic article individually (n = 42) or in groups (n = 46) during a 45-minute\r\nlesson on basic haemorheology. At the end of the lesson, students completed a test\r\nand an evaluation form. There were no differences between the two intervention\r\ngroups with regard to the total test score, but students who had worked in groups\r\nrated their own effort during the lesson higher. In the present study, a collaborative\r\nteaching strategy did not lead to higher test scores than an individual teaching\r\nstrategy. However, our findings suggest that students working in groups may\r\nfeel a greater level of involvement during class.

AB - Abstract — We evaluated whether a classic article on haemorheology would\r\nlead to better learning when integrated with a collaborative rather than an individual\r\nteaching strategy in the undergraduate physiology classroom setting. A total\r\nof 88 2nd-year medical students were randomised to solve assignments based on\r\nthe classic article individually (n = 42) or in groups (n = 46) during a 45-minute\r\nlesson on basic haemorheology. At the end of the lesson, students completed a test\r\nand an evaluation form. There were no differences between the two intervention\r\ngroups with regard to the total test score, but students who had worked in groups\r\nrated their own effort during the lesson higher. In the present study, a collaborative\r\nteaching strategy did not lead to higher test scores than an individual teaching\r\nstrategy. However, our findings suggest that students working in groups may\r\nfeel a greater level of involvement during class.

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/32892d7f-1bb8-39ff-9d77-eb21dea1dec9/

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 2

SP - 51

EP - 55

JO - MEFANET Journal

JF - MEFANET Journal

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 237006662