Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation : Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial. / Sørensen, Samuel K.; Johannessen, Arne; Worck, René; Hansen, Morten L.; Hansen, Jim.

In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Vol. 14, No. 5, e009573, 2021, p. 523-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sørensen, SK, Johannessen, A, Worck, R, Hansen, ML & Hansen, J 2021, 'Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial', Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 14, no. 5, e009573, pp. 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009573

APA

Sørensen, S. K., Johannessen, A., Worck, R., Hansen, M. L., & Hansen, J. (2021). Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 14(5), 523-532. [e009573]. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009573

Vancouver

Sørensen SK, Johannessen A, Worck R, Hansen ML, Hansen J. Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2021;14(5):523-532. e009573. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009573

Author

Sørensen, Samuel K. ; Johannessen, Arne ; Worck, René ; Hansen, Morten L. ; Hansen, Jim. / Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation : Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2021 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 523-532.

Bibtex

@article{0746e81c4af94e3eab223990568d8460,
title = "Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background: Recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is presumably caused by failure to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The primary methods of PVI are radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF) and cryoballoon catheter ablation (CRYO), but these methods have not been directly compared with respect to PVI durability and the effect thereof on AF burden (% of time in AF). Methods: Accordingly, we performed a randomized trial including 98 patients (68% male, 61 [55-67] years) with paroxysmal AF assigned 1:1 to PVI by contact-force sensing, irrigated radiofrequency catheter, or second-generation cryoballoon catheter. Implantable cardiac monitors were inserted ≥1 month before PVI for assessment of AF burden and recurrence, and all patients, irrespective of AF recurrence, underwent a second procedure 4 to 6 months after PVI to determine PVI durability. Results: In the second procedure, 152 out of 199 (76%) pulmonary veins (PVs) were found durably isolated after RF and 161 out of 200 (81%) after CRYO (P=0.32), corresponding to durable isolation of all veins in 47% of patients in both groups (P=1.0). Median AF burden before PVI was 5.4% (interquartile range, 0.5%-13.0%) versus 4.0% (0.6%-18.1%), RF versus CRYO (P=0.71), and reduced to 0.0% (0.0%-0.1%) and 0.0% (0.0%-0.5%), respectively (P=0.58) - a reduction of 99.9% (92.9%-100.0%) and 99.3% (85.9%-100.0%; P=0.36). AF burden after PVI significantly correlated to the number of durably isolated PVs (P<0.01), but 9 out of 45 (20%) patients with durable isolation of all veins had recurrence of AF within 4 to 6 months after PVI (excluding a 3-month blanking period). Conclusions: PVI by RF and CRYO produce similar moderate to high PVI durability. Both treatments lead to marked reductions in AF burden, which is related to the number of durably isolated PVs. However, for one-fifth of paroxysmal AF patients, complete and durable PVI was not sufficient to prevent even short-term AF recurrence. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03805555.",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, cryosurgery, electrocardiography, ambulatory, pulmonary vein, radiofrequency ablation, recurrence, second-look surgery",
author = "S{\o}rensen, {Samuel K.} and Arne Johannessen and Ren{\'e} Worck and Hansen, {Morten L.} and Jim Hansen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009573",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "523--532",
journal = "Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology",
issn = "1941-3149",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

T2 - Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Sørensen, Samuel K.

AU - Johannessen, Arne

AU - Worck, René

AU - Hansen, Morten L.

AU - Hansen, Jim

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: Recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is presumably caused by failure to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The primary methods of PVI are radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF) and cryoballoon catheter ablation (CRYO), but these methods have not been directly compared with respect to PVI durability and the effect thereof on AF burden (% of time in AF). Methods: Accordingly, we performed a randomized trial including 98 patients (68% male, 61 [55-67] years) with paroxysmal AF assigned 1:1 to PVI by contact-force sensing, irrigated radiofrequency catheter, or second-generation cryoballoon catheter. Implantable cardiac monitors were inserted ≥1 month before PVI for assessment of AF burden and recurrence, and all patients, irrespective of AF recurrence, underwent a second procedure 4 to 6 months after PVI to determine PVI durability. Results: In the second procedure, 152 out of 199 (76%) pulmonary veins (PVs) were found durably isolated after RF and 161 out of 200 (81%) after CRYO (P=0.32), corresponding to durable isolation of all veins in 47% of patients in both groups (P=1.0). Median AF burden before PVI was 5.4% (interquartile range, 0.5%-13.0%) versus 4.0% (0.6%-18.1%), RF versus CRYO (P=0.71), and reduced to 0.0% (0.0%-0.1%) and 0.0% (0.0%-0.5%), respectively (P=0.58) - a reduction of 99.9% (92.9%-100.0%) and 99.3% (85.9%-100.0%; P=0.36). AF burden after PVI significantly correlated to the number of durably isolated PVs (P<0.01), but 9 out of 45 (20%) patients with durable isolation of all veins had recurrence of AF within 4 to 6 months after PVI (excluding a 3-month blanking period). Conclusions: PVI by RF and CRYO produce similar moderate to high PVI durability. Both treatments lead to marked reductions in AF burden, which is related to the number of durably isolated PVs. However, for one-fifth of paroxysmal AF patients, complete and durable PVI was not sufficient to prevent even short-term AF recurrence. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03805555.

AB - Background: Recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is presumably caused by failure to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The primary methods of PVI are radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF) and cryoballoon catheter ablation (CRYO), but these methods have not been directly compared with respect to PVI durability and the effect thereof on AF burden (% of time in AF). Methods: Accordingly, we performed a randomized trial including 98 patients (68% male, 61 [55-67] years) with paroxysmal AF assigned 1:1 to PVI by contact-force sensing, irrigated radiofrequency catheter, or second-generation cryoballoon catheter. Implantable cardiac monitors were inserted ≥1 month before PVI for assessment of AF burden and recurrence, and all patients, irrespective of AF recurrence, underwent a second procedure 4 to 6 months after PVI to determine PVI durability. Results: In the second procedure, 152 out of 199 (76%) pulmonary veins (PVs) were found durably isolated after RF and 161 out of 200 (81%) after CRYO (P=0.32), corresponding to durable isolation of all veins in 47% of patients in both groups (P=1.0). Median AF burden before PVI was 5.4% (interquartile range, 0.5%-13.0%) versus 4.0% (0.6%-18.1%), RF versus CRYO (P=0.71), and reduced to 0.0% (0.0%-0.1%) and 0.0% (0.0%-0.5%), respectively (P=0.58) - a reduction of 99.9% (92.9%-100.0%) and 99.3% (85.9%-100.0%; P=0.36). AF burden after PVI significantly correlated to the number of durably isolated PVs (P<0.01), but 9 out of 45 (20%) patients with durable isolation of all veins had recurrence of AF within 4 to 6 months after PVI (excluding a 3-month blanking period). Conclusions: PVI by RF and CRYO produce similar moderate to high PVI durability. Both treatments lead to marked reductions in AF burden, which is related to the number of durably isolated PVs. However, for one-fifth of paroxysmal AF patients, complete and durable PVI was not sufficient to prevent even short-term AF recurrence. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03805555.

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - catheter ablation

KW - cryosurgery

KW - electrocardiography, ambulatory

KW - pulmonary vein

KW - radiofrequency ablation

KW - recurrence

KW - second-look surgery

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009573

DO - 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009573

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33835823

AN - SCOPUS:85106169990

VL - 14

SP - 523

EP - 532

JO - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

JF - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

SN - 1941-3149

IS - 5

M1 - e009573

ER -

ID: 304055291