TY - JOUR

T1 - Motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging using sparsely sampled MR navigators

T2 - a clinically feasible tool

AU - Keller, Sune H

AU - Hansen, Casper

AU - Hansen, Christian

AU - Andersen, Flemming L

AU - Ladefoged, Claes

AU - Svarer, Claus

AU - Kjær, Andreas

AU - Højgaard, Liselotte

AU - Law, Ian

AU - Henriksen, Otto M.

AU - Hansen, Adam E

N1 - Erratum: https://ejnmmiphys.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40658-015-0126-z

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: We present a study performing motion correction (MC) of PET using MR navigators sampled between other protocolled MR sequences during simultaneous PET/MR brain scanning with the purpose of evaluating its clinical feasibility and the potential improvement of image quality.FINDINGS: Twenty-nine human subjects had a 30-min [(11)C]-PiB PET scan with simultaneous MR including 3D navigators sampled at six time points, which were used to correct the PET image for rigid head motion. Five subjects with motion greater than 4 mm were reconstructed into six frames (one for each navigator) which were averaged to one image after MC. The average maximum motion magnitude observed was 3.9 ± 2.4 mm (1 to 11 mm). Visual evaluation by a nuclear medicine physician of the five subjects' motion corrected rated three of the five images blurred before motion correction, while no images were rated blurred after. The image quality was scored on a scale of 1-5, 5 being best. The score changed from an average of 3.4 before motion correction to 4.0 after. There was no correlation between maximum motion magnitude and rating. Quantitative SUVr scoring did not change markedly with motion correction.CONCLUSIONS: Sparsely sampled navigators can be used for characterization and correction of head motion. A slight, overall decrease in blurring and an increase in image quality with MC was found, but without impact on clinical interpretation. In future studies with noteworthy motion artifacts, our method is an important and simple-to-use tool to have available for motion correction.

AB - BACKGROUND: We present a study performing motion correction (MC) of PET using MR navigators sampled between other protocolled MR sequences during simultaneous PET/MR brain scanning with the purpose of evaluating its clinical feasibility and the potential improvement of image quality.FINDINGS: Twenty-nine human subjects had a 30-min [(11)C]-PiB PET scan with simultaneous MR including 3D navigators sampled at six time points, which were used to correct the PET image for rigid head motion. Five subjects with motion greater than 4 mm were reconstructed into six frames (one for each navigator) which were averaged to one image after MC. The average maximum motion magnitude observed was 3.9 ± 2.4 mm (1 to 11 mm). Visual evaluation by a nuclear medicine physician of the five subjects' motion corrected rated three of the five images blurred before motion correction, while no images were rated blurred after. The image quality was scored on a scale of 1-5, 5 being best. The score changed from an average of 3.4 before motion correction to 4.0 after. There was no correlation between maximum motion magnitude and rating. Quantitative SUVr scoring did not change markedly with motion correction.CONCLUSIONS: Sparsely sampled navigators can be used for characterization and correction of head motion. A slight, overall decrease in blurring and an increase in image quality with MC was found, but without impact on clinical interpretation. In future studies with noteworthy motion artifacts, our method is an important and simple-to-use tool to have available for motion correction.

U2 - 10.1186/s40658-015-0118-z

DO - 10.1186/s40658-015-0118-z

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26501815

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - E J N M M I Physics

JF - E J N M M I Physics

SN - 2197-7364

M1 - 14

ER -