Injection Technique and Pen Needle Design Affect Leakage From Skin After Subcutaneous Injections
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Injection Technique and Pen Needle Design Affect Leakage From Skin After Subcutaneous Injections. / Præstmark, Kezia Ann; Stallknecht, Bente; Jensen, Morten Lind; Sparre, Thomas; Madsen, Nils Berg; Kildegaard, Jonas.
In: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 07.2016, p. 914-922.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Injection Technique and Pen Needle Design Affect Leakage From Skin After Subcutaneous Injections
AU - Præstmark, Kezia Ann
AU - Stallknecht, Bente
AU - Jensen, Morten Lind
AU - Sparre, Thomas
AU - Madsen, Nils Berg
AU - Kildegaard, Jonas
N1 - © 2016 Diabetes Technology Society.
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: After a subcutaneous injection fluid might leak out of the skin, commonly referred to as leakage or backflow. The objective was to examine the influence of needle design and injection technique on leakage after injections in the subcutaneous tissue of humans and pigs.METHOD: Leakage data were obtained from a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data and from a pig study. Data from the clinical study were used to determine leakage as a function of injection volume, speed and region. Data from the pig study were used to determine leakage as a function of needle wall thickness, needle taper, injection angle, and wait time from end of injection to withdrawal of needle from skin.RESULTS: Leakage volume was positively related to injection volume. Injections in the abdomen caused less leakage than thigh injections. A 32G needle caused less leakage than a 31G and a 32G tip (tapered) needle, and a "straight in" 90° needle insertion angle caused less leakage than an angled (~45°) insertion. Wait times of minimum 3 seconds caused less leakage than immediate withdrawal of the needle after injection. Needle wall thickness and injection speed did not influence leakage.CONCLUSIONS: Leakage will be minimized using a thin needle, using 90° needle insertion in the abdomen, injecting maximum 800 µL at a time, and waiting at least 3 seconds after the injection until the needle is withdrawn from the skin.
AB - BACKGROUND: After a subcutaneous injection fluid might leak out of the skin, commonly referred to as leakage or backflow. The objective was to examine the influence of needle design and injection technique on leakage after injections in the subcutaneous tissue of humans and pigs.METHOD: Leakage data were obtained from a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data and from a pig study. Data from the clinical study were used to determine leakage as a function of injection volume, speed and region. Data from the pig study were used to determine leakage as a function of needle wall thickness, needle taper, injection angle, and wait time from end of injection to withdrawal of needle from skin.RESULTS: Leakage volume was positively related to injection volume. Injections in the abdomen caused less leakage than thigh injections. A 32G needle caused less leakage than a 31G and a 32G tip (tapered) needle, and a "straight in" 90° needle insertion angle caused less leakage than an angled (~45°) insertion. Wait times of minimum 3 seconds caused less leakage than immediate withdrawal of the needle after injection. Needle wall thickness and injection speed did not influence leakage.CONCLUSIONS: Leakage will be minimized using a thin needle, using 90° needle insertion in the abdomen, injecting maximum 800 µL at a time, and waiting at least 3 seconds after the injection until the needle is withdrawn from the skin.
U2 - 10.1177/1932296815626723
DO - 10.1177/1932296815626723
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26798083
VL - 10
SP - 914
EP - 922
JO - Journal of diabetes science and technology
JF - Journal of diabetes science and technology
SN - 1932-2968
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 167805491