High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a single-centre randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation : a single-centre randomised controlled trial. / Homberg, Marloes C.; Bouman, Esther A.; Linz, Dominik; van Kuijk, Sander M.J.; Joosten, Bert A.; Buhre, Wolfgang F.

In: Trials, Vol. 23, No. 1, 378, 2022, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Homberg, MC, Bouman, EA, Linz, D, van Kuijk, SMJ, Joosten, BA & Buhre, WF 2022, 'High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a single-centre randomised controlled trial', Trials, vol. 23, no. 1, 378, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06362-1

APA

Homberg, M. C., Bouman, E. A., Linz, D., van Kuijk, S. M. J., Joosten, B. A., & Buhre, W. F. (2022). High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Trials, 23(1), 1-12. [378]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06362-1

Vancouver

Homberg MC, Bouman EA, Linz D, van Kuijk SMJ, Joosten BA, Buhre WF. High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):1-12. 378. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06362-1

Author

Homberg, Marloes C. ; Bouman, Esther A. ; Linz, Dominik ; van Kuijk, Sander M.J. ; Joosten, Bert A. ; Buhre, Wolfgang F. / High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation : a single-centre randomised controlled trial. In: Trials. 2022 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 1-12.

Bibtex

@article{da5ef86e837b4be689af9d72060ccdb4,
title = "High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a single-centre randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: To our knowledge, there are few trials studying the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during deep sedation. Our hypothesis is that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) will prevent hypoxemia and desaturation as compared to low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC) during prolonged deep sedation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Methods: A single-centre, randomised controlled trial with HFNC as the intervention and LFNC as the control group. A total of 94 adult patients per group undergoing elective radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation under deep sedation. will be included. The primary outcome is the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2). Secondary outcomes are as follows: the duration of lowest SpO2, cross over from oxygen therapy in both directions, incidence of SpO2 below 90% > 60 seconds, adverse sedation events, adverse effects of HFNC, mean CO2, peak CO2 and patients experience with oxygen therapy. The study will take place during the 2-day admission period for RFCA. Patients can fill out their questionnaires in the first week after treatment. Discussion: HFNC is increasingly used as a technique for oxygen delivery in procedural sedation and analgesia. We hypothesise that HFNC is superior to the standard treatment LFNC in patients under deep sedation with respect to the incidence of desaturation. To our knowledge, there are no adequately powered clinical trial studies on the effects of HFNC in prolonged deep sedation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04842253. Registered on 04 April 2021",
keywords = "Anaesthesiology, Atrial fibrillation, Deep sedation, High-flow nasal cannula, Radiofrequency catheter ablation, Randomised controlled trial, Sedation",
author = "Homberg, {Marloes C.} and Bouman, {Esther A.} and Dominik Linz and {van Kuijk}, {Sander M.J.} and Joosten, {Bert A.} and Buhre, {Wolfgang F.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-022-06362-1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

T2 - a single-centre randomised controlled trial

AU - Homberg, Marloes C.

AU - Bouman, Esther A.

AU - Linz, Dominik

AU - van Kuijk, Sander M.J.

AU - Joosten, Bert A.

AU - Buhre, Wolfgang F.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: To our knowledge, there are few trials studying the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during deep sedation. Our hypothesis is that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) will prevent hypoxemia and desaturation as compared to low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC) during prolonged deep sedation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Methods: A single-centre, randomised controlled trial with HFNC as the intervention and LFNC as the control group. A total of 94 adult patients per group undergoing elective radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation under deep sedation. will be included. The primary outcome is the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2). Secondary outcomes are as follows: the duration of lowest SpO2, cross over from oxygen therapy in both directions, incidence of SpO2 below 90% > 60 seconds, adverse sedation events, adverse effects of HFNC, mean CO2, peak CO2 and patients experience with oxygen therapy. The study will take place during the 2-day admission period for RFCA. Patients can fill out their questionnaires in the first week after treatment. Discussion: HFNC is increasingly used as a technique for oxygen delivery in procedural sedation and analgesia. We hypothesise that HFNC is superior to the standard treatment LFNC in patients under deep sedation with respect to the incidence of desaturation. To our knowledge, there are no adequately powered clinical trial studies on the effects of HFNC in prolonged deep sedation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04842253. Registered on 04 April 2021

AB - Background: To our knowledge, there are few trials studying the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during deep sedation. Our hypothesis is that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) will prevent hypoxemia and desaturation as compared to low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC) during prolonged deep sedation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Methods: A single-centre, randomised controlled trial with HFNC as the intervention and LFNC as the control group. A total of 94 adult patients per group undergoing elective radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation under deep sedation. will be included. The primary outcome is the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2). Secondary outcomes are as follows: the duration of lowest SpO2, cross over from oxygen therapy in both directions, incidence of SpO2 below 90% > 60 seconds, adverse sedation events, adverse effects of HFNC, mean CO2, peak CO2 and patients experience with oxygen therapy. The study will take place during the 2-day admission period for RFCA. Patients can fill out their questionnaires in the first week after treatment. Discussion: HFNC is increasingly used as a technique for oxygen delivery in procedural sedation and analgesia. We hypothesise that HFNC is superior to the standard treatment LFNC in patients under deep sedation with respect to the incidence of desaturation. To our knowledge, there are no adequately powered clinical trial studies on the effects of HFNC in prolonged deep sedation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04842253. Registered on 04 April 2021

KW - Anaesthesiology

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Deep sedation

KW - High-flow nasal cannula

KW - Radiofrequency catheter ablation

KW - Randomised controlled trial

KW - Sedation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129517184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-022-06362-1

DO - 10.1186/s13063-022-06362-1

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35534903

AN - SCOPUS:85129517184

VL - 23

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

IS - 1

M1 - 378

ER -

ID: 310847991